Is this one of thkse post where no matter you are gonna complain the games are not AAA and sk they dont count??
How many new AAA IPs have you seen on Switch. That's what I want.That's fine. Nothing wrong with that. I was more so talking about your logic of those games not being exciting unless you're a fan of them to begin with. I mean, doesn't that apply to just about every game?
At least they closed a ridiculous thread about Sea of Thieves today. But yeah, Xbox threads are a disaster too. lolNah, that's not true. If this was about the XB1, it would still be up ;)
If he hasn't played them before, so what?
Seriously. I only finished that game last month and I feel like I missed out on most of the side content. Still haven't 100%ed BotW or Odyssey, let alone finished Rabbids. Have barely touched Splatoon 2 SP, and have a load of indie games and third party titles sitting in my backlog.I started the year with Xenoblade and it took me a long damn time. I know it's a december game but i mean, it's not a game you can beat in a week with a normal life.
Just curious, how many of you that finds this period « dry » did not play XC2?
In general? None and I don't really expect that change all that much throughout the years. The Switch will mainly receive Nintendo's own games, indie titles, Japanese titles, and a few Western titles. If you were primarily looking for AAA games, you were better off not bothering with portable systems.How many new AAA IPs have you seen on Switch. That's what I want.
Oh that they are and I'm saying this as someone who isn't even that big of a Microsoft fan. As someone who prefers Nintendo and Sony, seeing Microsoft threads always go south kind of sucks because I wanna get more involved with my XB1At least they closed a ridiculous thread about Sea of Thieves today. But yeah, Xbox threads are a disaster too. lol
I game over 20 hours a week and have still have a backlog on Switch.
If Switch is only a Mario, Zelda, Metroid Box then honestly you were always going to have long dry spells on Switch, or any Nintendo system.
Edit: To be clear, it's fine if thats all you play Nintendo systems for. I just think it's worth mentioning that you have limited Nintendo systems going in and I assume that's the expectation.
That doesn't matters when now those games can be played in a portable. In the case of some games like Hyrule Warriors they no longer have to play it with a terrible performance.
It's like people miss the fact as to why the Switch it's "underpowered", are they acting deliberately ignorant?
Well if I hadn't played many of these games already, the lineup would be quite amazing. You seem to have the time to play them now while I play nothing, so we both seem to have time for games. I'd also assume you play more games than me, so I have less to choose from but that's just an assumption.I bring up how quickly people go through games because I feel like nobody is actually talking about the game library on the system, but rather just new games. A drought to me is when there are so few games available on the system that I can't find a single one that I want to play (or play more/again as the case may be) for a period of at least a month. This was the Wii U in early 2013. It had almost nothing to play outside of the launch games. For me this was the Switch between May and August of last year. It had very few first or third party games that appealed to me outside of the ones I bought at launch.
However that's not something anyone should be able to say now, when there are >600 games on the system in a huge number of genres. I don't care that, say, 500 of them released in 2017, they're still available to play if I'm looking for something to play. Maybe most people have played many of these elsewhere, but I have a really hard time believing so many people have enough game time to have played all of the games on the system that might interest them.
After I finished Celeste I was looking for a new game to play, and I saw Resident Evil Revelations 1+2 on sale, so I got those even though they released last November. I was interested then but I was too busy with DOOM and Skyrim to have time for them then. Now in 2018 they've given me ~120 hours of play time (raid mode is awesome). This is what I mean when I say this system doesn't have a drought.
As I said above I got a lot of play time out of RE Rev. And Bayonetta 1+2 got me about ~80 hours combined. I know those are all ports but RE were ports that I've never played before and I never had much time to play the Bayo games on Wii U. Obviously YMMV in these situations, but I really do think the 600+ games have enough variety and quality in them that everyone should be able to find something they enjoy, unless they've played all of those games before (which goes back to my question of how much time they have to play games).
So? You could say the same about most of the PS4's first couple of years.
I personally love these ports as they give me a chance to play games I didn't have time for otherwise.
To be serious for a second, I actually do think one mistake Nintendo made this year was releasing LABO when they did. That product would have made more sense a year or two from now, when the Switch has seen a price drop or two. LABO releasing in 2019 or 2020 next to a $249 or $199 Switch console would have been a smarter move, in my opinion. Positioning LABO as a key title for the first half of 2018 always felt a bit weird to me, even if I think the idea is really cool (though something I'm personally not interested in at all). I think a more "core" oriented piece of software in April would have made more sense at this point in the lifecycle.
That being said y'all still confound me.
I think they wanted to get Labo out as early as possible without upsetting the "core" fanbase, in order to spread the WoM and maybe even start a few viral videos (like the one with the guy controlling his wheelchair). It was never positioned to be a big seller out of the gate, so I'm not sure if they even think of it as a key title for H1 of 2018. I think they want its legs to continue for a very long time.
Nothing. But other people might have played them/had the opportunity to play them before and were not interested, and want new games to play on the switch.
I guess that's the difference. I don't think of Switch as portable system so I'm expecting more.In general? None and I don't really expect that change all that much throughout the years. The Switch will mainly receive Nintendo's own games, indie titles, Japanese titles, and a few Western titles. If you were primarily looking for AAA games, you were better off not bothering with portable systems.
Well it's also still a Nintendo system at the end of the day. It has way better support than most previous Nintendo systems but it was never going to be on par with the PS4 or XB1 in that regardI guess that's the difference. I don't think of Switch as portable system so I'm expecting more.
Posts like this are such a waste of time. So defensive and so derailing to threads. If your feelings are hurt by a subject, maybe spend your time posting in others that don't.
shh no talking, we're at a funeral
It looks like you are trying to pick a fight. LOL! I just don't care about Metroid or Pikmin because I preferred other types of games that are more traditional. I tried them. Found them boring. I don't know what else to tell you.
I bring up how quickly people go through games because I feel like nobody is actually talking about the game library on the system, but rather just new games. A drought to me is when there are so few games available on the system that I can't find a single one that I want to play (or play more/again as the case may be) for a period of at least a month. This was the Wii U in early 2013. It had almost nothing to play outside of the launch games. For me this was the Switch between May and August of last year. It had very few first or third party games that appealed to me outside of the ones I bought at launch.
However that's not something anyone should be able to say now, when there are >600 games on the system in a huge number of genres. I don't care that, say, 500 of them released in 2017, they're still available to play if I'm looking for something to play. Maybe most people have played many of these elsewhere, but I have a really hard time believing so many people have enough game time to have played all of the games on the system that might interest them.
After I finished Celeste I was looking for a new game to play, and I saw Resident Evil Revelations 1+2 on sale, so I got those even though they released last November. I was interested then but I was too busy with DOOM and Skyrim to have time for them then. Now in 2018 they've given me ~120 hours of play time (raid mode is awesome). This is what I mean when I say this system doesn't have a drought.
As I said above I got a lot of play time out of RE Rev. And Bayonetta 1+2 got me about ~80 hours combined. I know those are all ports but RE were ports that I've never played before and I never had much time to play the Bayo games on Wii U. Obviously YMMV in these situations, but I really do think the 600+ games have enough variety and quality in them that everyone should be able to find something they enjoy, unless they've played all of those games before (which goes back to my question of how much time they have to play games).
So? You could say the same about most of the PS4's first couple of years.
I personally love these ports as they give me a chance to play games I didn't have time for otherwise.
Well if I hadn't played many of these games already, the lineup would be quite amazing. You seem to have the time to play them now while I play nothing, so we both seem to have time for games. I'd also assume you play more games than me, so I have less to choose from but that's just an assumption.
Nintendo is my primary console, so I've played every big U game aside 101. If you're one of those people balancing 3 consoles then you're likely to have missed some of the U games.
The Wii U wasn't that long ago, so I'm not sure how so many people have forgotten what a "drought" from Nintendo actually looks like.
Wii U first half of 2013:
Lego City Undercover
Game & Wario
Pokemon Rumble U (Japan only)
Switch first half of 2018:
Bayonetta and Bayonetta 2
Kirby Star Allies
Nintendo Labo
Donkey Kong Country: Tropical Freeze
Hyrule Warriors: Definitive Edition
Sushi Striker: The Way of Sushido
Mario Tennis Aces
These situations are not even remotely comparable. If you're not personally interested in these titles, fair enough, but implying that this the "same old Nintendo" or that they "didn't learn their lesson" is disingenuous.
Yes, everyone who disagrees with you or the OP is a Nintendo fanboy. How dare anyone share a different opinion
I bought Labo just because I was desperate for something to do with my Switch. Now everything is built, and that was fun, but I don't give a damn about those games.
Is this one of thkse post where no matter you are gonna complain the games are not AAA and sk they dont count??
I guess that's the difference. I don't think of Switch as portable system so I'm expecting more.
This thread again... lol. Nop OP, the Switch still selling really good.
Why is complaining about Kirby something that seems to be popular lately, what's wrong with people
I'm not saying that, I don't even have an opinion on the switch because the portability doens't appeal to me hence is a non-starter.
But there are tons of posts in this thread a that are dismissive of the OP, equating what he is saying (the honeymoon period is over) to "Switch is Dead!!, Nintendo is finished!!!" .Which is not what the OP is saying, at all.
I could quote all of them, which are much more dismissive and drive-by posting than my own, which was just a funny remark at those dozens of posts, but I would get yet another warning because that's how moderation works here in regards to Nintendo. I guess those users must be spamming the report button :P
You can be pretty sure if you make a thread about this for the PS4, it will get (rightfully) closed. This is just calling for hot takes and console warriors that don't even care about the system being discussed.I'm not saying that, I don't even have an opinion on the switch because the portability doens't appeal to me hence is a non-starter.
But there are tons of posts in this thread a that are dismissive of the OP, equating what he is saying (the honeymoon period is over) to "Switch is Dead!!, Nintendo is finished!!!" .Which is not what the OP is saying, at all.
I could quote all of them, which are much more dismissive and drive-by posting than my own, which was just a funny remark at those dozens of posts, but I would get yet another warning because that's how moderation works here in regards to Nintendo. I guess those users must be spamming the report button :P
So was the Wii, but it still was dead last in terms of games, with constant draughts and few high quality titles.This thread again... lol. Nop OP, the Switch still selling really good.
Oh there are definitely people who are doing that and I don't necessarily approve of it. It's just that that's basically typical behavior from gamers across the board online and, in all honesty, it could have been avoided had the OP titled the thread better to more accurately reflect his point. People were naturally gonna look at the title, sigh, and go "One of THESE again?". This is hardly exclusive to Nintendo fans. Just look at how quickly "negative" God of War threads got closedI'm not saying that, I don't even have an opinion on the switch because the portability doens't appeal to me hence is a non-starter.
But there are tons of posts in this thread a that are dismissive of the OP, equating what he is saying (the honeymoon period is over) to "Switch is Dead!!, Nintendo is finished!!!" .Which is not what the OP is saying, at all.
I could quote all of them, which are much more dismissive and drive-by posting than my own, which was just a funny remark at those dozens of posts, but I would get yet another warning because that's how moderation works here in regards to Nintendo. I guess those users must be spamming the report button :P
Have you played Metroid on Wii or on DS? Those controls drove me nuts.
Check the post right after mine for an example of what I was saying :P
Yes, that is one of the worst takes. lol But I just read all this as "this game doesn't have insane GFX". Sure, you don't need to be interested in all games, but let's not pretend these boxes check for everyone. If they did, the Switch wouldn't be selling 300K in a March with Kirby as its biggest release.One of the things I just don't get is why there is this permanent narrative that there is a drought of games for Switch in 2018, I get it you have incredibly high standards for what games you buy or not for the console but this "drought" really only applies if:
- You don't care about Indies
- You don't care about third party games
- You don't care about Wii U ports
- You don't care about casual games
- You don't care about games rated less than 90+ MC
That's a lot of filters, makes me wonder how many PS4/XB1/PC games even fit your criteria.
It boggles my mind that there are actually people in this forum than haven't bought anything since Mario Odyssey.