For cosmic marvel??I don't know if Gunn would be right for Silver Surfer. I'd prefer someone with a more restrained style. Like Villeneuve ^^
For cosmic marvel??I don't know if Gunn would be right for Silver Surfer. I'd prefer someone with a more restrained style. Like Villeneuve ^^
Thread titles would need to be easily editable.
exactly. either editable thread titles or just abide by the new news, new thread policy.Thread titles would need to be easily editable.
I can understand how some topics taking over can be annoying. But, I mean . . . how else are we supposed to stay on top of things?
Putting your account at the mercy of Bob Iger's whims seems dangerous. Lol.I'd be willing to bet my account that he comes back. Mods can hold me to it, if they'd like.
The OP should be updating the first post with new news, and they are the ones that usually request the thread update.If there's only going to be one thread for an ongoing topic, there really have to be constant mod updates to the title to let people know about new developments, and that seems less ideal than just making new threads.
that should make it all the more reason for other level headed people to step in and right this wrongHorn is retiring this year anyway. Let him own the shit he created.
Head of Disney Stuido,Alan Horn thought he would get the same praise like when Channing Dungey president of ABC Entertainment fired Roseanne, he is wrong. Kevin Feige wants Gunn back too.
https://deadline.com/2018/08/james-...disney-eleventh-hour-save-attempt-1202443199/
They just need to reinstate James Gunn & get it over with. It's clear that Disney jumped the gun, & I totally understand making sure that they don't fuck up any further. But all this will-they-won't-they stuff is getting tiring. Just give Gunn his job back & move on so things can get back to normal (somewhat).Head of Disney Stuido,Alan Horn thought he would get the same praise like when Channing Dungey president of ABC Entertainment fired Roseanne, he is wrong. Kevin Feige wants Gunn back too.
https://deadline.com/2018/08/james-...disney-eleventh-hour-save-attempt-1202443199/
Someone on Reddit (won't post a link, nope) is posting Iger and Horn's email addresses in Gunn threads.
Those poor assistants who have to filter their email...
Head of Disney Stuido,Alan Horn thought he would get the same praise like when Channing Dungey president of ABC Entertainment fired Roseanne, he is wrong. Kevin Feige wants Gunn back too.
https://deadline.com/2018/08/james-...disney-eleventh-hour-save-attempt-1202443199/
Head of Disney Stuido,Alan Horn thought he would get the same praise like when Channing Dungey president of ABC Entertainment fired Roseanne, he is wrong. Kevin Feige wants Gunn back too.
https://deadline.com/2018/08/james-...disney-eleventh-hour-save-attempt-1202443199/
oh shit, I really hope the Nameless thing is still in the pipes because I was all over that before he got under fire
So why the symbol from nameless?It never was Nameless.
It's this movie:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7752126/?ref_=nm_flmg_prd_2
A low budget horror movie produced by him, written by his two bothers (not Sean), and directed by his friend and with some of his friends in the cast to keep the budget down.
It comes out at the end of November.
Huh. Seems like far too big of coincidence, but I guess we'll see.Not going to derail the thread, because this was already discussed in the thread back at SDCC.
It's not the symbol for Nameless. It's two Bs (one backwards) as it looks like the title of the movie is "Benjamin Breyer"
https://www.resetera.com/threads/james-gunn-teases-sdcc-reveal-on-twitter.55939/#post-10490165
If the rumors are true, that'd be Fiege (and he carries a LOT of weight), the whole cast of Guardians, several hundred thousand fans, and quite a few others.I figured this was a Horn thing from the start. I'm glad that Feige is stepping up to bat for Gunn, assuming that the rumors are true.
If this is true it would make a lot of sense, lol. A clownish effort to reap goodwill by ineptly copying a justified public sacking. A dunderheaded exec drifting into the fraught rapids of social media controversy with all the grace of a deflated blimp.Head of Disney Stuido,Alan Horn thought he would get the same praise like when Channing Dungey president of ABC Entertainment fired Roseanne, he is wrong. Kevin Feige wants Gunn back too.
https://deadline.com/2018/08/james-...disney-eleventh-hour-save-attempt-1202443199/
well fuckIt never was Nameless.
It's this movie:
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt7752126/?ref_=nm_flmg_prd_2
A low budget horror movie produced by him, written by his two bothers (not Sean), and directed by his friend and with some of his friends in the cast to keep the budget down.
It comes out at the end of November.
Consistently since this thing has started, there's been flocks of users jumping in and comparing the two. And when explained why they're different, they either run off or switch to something else.The fact that he thought the two scenarios was similar is kinda scary.
Maybe the thread needs a new title so people stop making new threads.
(But that's just one poster's idea.)
I made that post after seeing the mods shut down another thread on the subject of this thread so there's nothing for me to report.
Well use the report function to have mod update title. Or are you not supposed to use that function
news to me i asked one to update a thread i made for 3ds/ds for me.Well use the report function to have mod update title. Or are you not supposed to use that function
Why are people going to bat so hard for this guy? The tweets I saw were fucking horrible and this whole "oh well, he's just a target of the alt-right" is a complete non-starter for me. It doesn't matter who raised the red flag. What matters is his personal history and if Disney hired him not knowing about his sexist/rapist/paedo social media past, then I feel they're entirely justified to sack him. To do otherwise is to invite tarnishing their company image. Like, it's cool that he's sorry and moved on from those views and so on but he still needs to own his mistakes, however many times they come up.
What a mystery this is.
Why are people going to bat so hard for this guy? The tweets I saw were fucking horrible and this whole "oh well, he's just a target of the alt-right" is a complete non-starter for me. It doesn't matter who raised the red flag. What matters is his personal history and if Disney hired him not knowing about his sexist/rapist/paedo social media past, then I feel they're entirely justified to sack him. To do otherwise is to invite tarnishing their company image. Like, it's cool that he's sorry and moved on from those views and so on but he still needs to own his mistakes, however many times they come up.
Why are people going to bat so hard for this guy? The tweets I saw were fucking horrible and this whole "oh well, he's just a target of the alt-right" is a complete non-starter for me. It doesn't matter who raised the red flag. What matters is his personal history and if Disney hired him not knowing about his sexist/rapist/paedo social media past, then I feel they're entirely justified to sack him. To do otherwise is to invite tarnishing their company image. Like, it's cool that he's sorry and moved on from those views and so on but he still needs to own his mistakes, however many times they come up.
But he's apologised and been open about those mistakes for years, he's already done the growing and the learning.
Do you believe in personal growth? Do you believe a person can change? Because this sends a horrible message that we can't change from the person we were. (And I see a lot of detractors bring up Gunn's age. Does that mean there's a specific age we stop growing at?)
Not to mention the "target of the alt-right" absolutely should not be a non-starter. These people will continue to destroy people's careers using these tactics and worse tactics if they see that they work. What happens when that someone isn't a rich white director? What happens when they're an up-and-coming black woman?
Why are people going to bat so hard for this guy? The tweets I saw were fucking horrible and this whole "oh well, he's just a target of the alt-right" is a complete non-starter for me. It doesn't matter who raised the red flag. What matters is his personal history and if Disney hired him not knowing about his sexist/rapist/paedo social media past, then I feel they're entirely justified to sack him. To do otherwise is to invite tarnishing their company image. Like, it's cool that he's sorry and moved on from those views and so on but he still needs to own his mistakes, however many times they come up.
Forgiveness is a two-way street. He has to move on, and so do other people. He doesn't get to make a public apology (or two or whatever number) and then declare this issue is over. It's clearly not over and apparently some folks, including his bosses at Disney, haven't yet reached a point where they're willing to look past this shit. There isn't like a magic number of times he has to say he's sorry before the world forgets.
EDIT:
I've already addressed this. See above.
The messenger is not the message.
The world did forget, then the alt right came along and said "remember this?".Forgiveness is a two-way street. He has to move on, and so do other people. He doesn't get to make a public apology (or two or whatever number) and then declare this issue is over. It's clearly not over and apparently some folks, including his bosses at Disney, haven't yet reached a point where they're willing to look past this shit. There isn't like a magic number of times he has to say he's sorry before the world forgets.
EDIT:
I've already addressed this. See above.
The messenger is not the message.
Misreprestation of old tweets with the precise desire to take down a prominent Trump critic makes the messenger the message.Forgiveness is a two-way street. He has to move on, and so do other people. He doesn't get to make a public apology (or two or whatever number) and then declare this issue is over. It's clearly not over and apparently some folks, including his bosses at Disney, haven't yet reached a point where they're willing to look past this shit. There isn't like a magic number of times he has to say he's sorry before the world forgets.
EDIT:
I've already addressed this. See above.
The messenger is not the message.
Forgiveness is a two-way street. He has to move on, and so do other people. He doesn't get to make a public apology (or two or whatever number) and then declare this issue is over. It's clearly not over and apparently some folks, including his bosses at Disney, haven't yet reached a point where they're willing to look past this shit. There isn't like a magic number of times he has to say he's sorry before the world forgets.
Why are people going to bat so hard for this guy? The tweets I saw were fucking horrible and this whole "oh well, he's just a target of the alt-right" is a complete non-starter for me. It doesn't matter who raised the red flag. What matters is his personal history and if Disney hired him not knowing about his sexist/rapist/paedo social media past, then I feel they're entirely justified to sack him. To do otherwise is to invite tarnishing their company image. Like, it's cool that he's sorry and moved on from those views and so on but he still needs to own his mistakes, however many times they come up.
Yes, forgiveness can be a two-way street, and nobody is entitled to accept another's apology. But in this case it's obvious you didn't read up on what he has said on the subject (given how you dismiss it so decisively). Maybe actually read up on what he has said.
And if that doesn't matter at all to you, just say so.
Yes, forgiveness can be a two-way street, and nobody is entitled to accept another's apology. But in this case it's obvious you didn't read up on what he has said on the subject (given how you dismiss it so decisively). Maybe actually read up on what he has said.
In this case it absolutely is.
https://twitter.com/DaveBautista/status/1021125112974618624
I'm glad Bautista understands what is going on and has spoken out against it.
Taking your political cues from a former pro wrestler is probably not the best idea. The issue is crystal clear and it's not about Trump or fighting the Nazis. It's about creepy tweets from a once beloved film director.