its a false equivalency in the sense that giving kotick hundreds of millions of dollars is much, much, much worse. yes.
This is very, very silly
1) Kotick was going to come out of this a richer man, either way
2) Punishing Kotick would be nice, but creating a better work environment for AB's many, many employees is arguably much more important
3) Apparently Kotick might end up not being all that better off as a result of the deal? Seems to be somewhat in the air
4) Different companies, different relationships, different situations, and "you were willing to buy this company" and "you weren't willing to act as publisher for this company" just isn't going to make for the most compelling comparison a lot of the time