Lukemia SL

Member
Jan 30, 2018
9,410
Doesn't surprise in the least given the head of studio.

Would console war and trash talk about PS4 Pro on the old place

Talked trash about Sean Murray and Hideo Kojima here.

Then trashed Microsoft for not putting exclusives on other systems all upon a sudden near to the AB purchase.

This isn't something I would want to know or ever meet.
 

HellofaMouse

Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,505
you DID just buy a company that made an employee commit suicide and made people responsible, richer, you know..
 

riotous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,454
Seattle
Better questions are: (1) when did microsoft become aware of workplace issues (was it pre blind forest launch, was it before they greenlit will of the wisps), (2) to what degree were they made aware of the issues

Those are certainly better questions.

I just don't find Activision particularly relevant, it's a purchase of a massive publicly traded publisher w/ subsidiaries, not a contract to publish a game with a small company. MS can actually change Activision, and many of the problematic employees aren't any more/less owners than some random investors off the street.

If they don't change Activision, then the problematic behavior is now on Microsoft. MS had no power to change Moon Studios other than not continuing their relationship.
 

UraMallas

Member
Nov 1, 2017
20,021
United States
Those are certainly better questions.

I just don't find Activision particularly relevant, it's a purchase of a massive publicly traded publisher w/ subsidiaries, not a contract to publish a game with a small company. MS can actually change Activision, and many of the problematic employees aren't any more/less owners than some random investors off the street.

If they don't change Activision, then the problematic behavior is now on Microsoft. MS had no power to change Moon Studios other than not continuing their relationship.
They definitely took on the responsibility of the toxic work environment that permeates Actiblizz with the purchase and they need to clean it up or it WILL be their fault.

The idea that they are somehow culpable in past transgression at Actiblizz and comparing that to this situation is truly galaxy brain stuff tho. (Which you are not doing btw.)
 

riotous

Member
Oct 25, 2017
11,454
Seattle
They definitely took on the responsibility of the toxic work environment that permeates Actiblizz with the purchase and they need to clean it up or it WILL be their fault.

Yeah for sure, not sure if I was clear but my post was meant to imply the same.

MS will be judged on the Activision purchase later.

Having said that, many of the bigger problems are gone, and while they can't say it now since he's under contract all signs point to Kotick being out as both CEO and board member.

Looooots to do of course. Especially if MS is going to keep them separate (separate HR for instance, whereas MS's HR is decent by most accounts)
 

Sagroth

Member
Oct 28, 2017
7,034


This somehow lowers my opinion of them even further. Not because there's any real ethical difference between the two (abuse is abuse regardless of what team it is levied at), but the unmitigated gall of those two to attack MS's teams as well takes the stupidity and sheer commitment to being @$$holes to a whole other level. What did they think was gonna happen?
 
Last edited:

Frieza

Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,893
Doesn't surprise in the least given the head of studio.

Would console war and trash talk about PS4 Pro on the old place

Talked trash about Sean Murray and Hideo Kojima here.

Then trashed Microsoft for not putting exclusives on other systems all upon a sudden near to the AB purchase.

This isn't something I would want to know or ever meet.
I remember that he used to trash Sony and the PS4 Pro on the other site and seemingly when MS cuts ties with him he wants to become multiplat lol.
 

Doc Kelso

Member
Oct 25, 2017
5,217
NYC
you DID just buy a company that made an employee commit suicide and made people responsible, richer, you know..
There's a difference between giving someone a sack of money to create something and giving someone a sack of money to purchase something for yourself.

In one example, you don't really have a ton of say in how that money is spent. In the other, you have total control over it.
 

medyej

Member
Oct 26, 2017
6,632
Didn't a senior developer at Moon talk a lot of smack in the general direction of Team Cherry (Hollow Knight) in the run-up to Ori 2's release, or am I imagining that?

It's likely. Dude was always super salty that HK got so much attention and was really hostile when people pointed out that Ori 2 lifted tons of mechanics straight from HK, instead of just admitting the inspiration and showing respect to other developers.
 

GrrImAFridge

ONE THOUSAND DOLLARYDOOS
Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,731
Western Australia
Outside of being a PoS, he is also an idiot. Talk about biting the hand that feeds.

The extent to which the Moon execs lashed out makes me wonder whether we're looking at a case of signer's regret. The studio had an appealing indie game, MS came knocking, but it wasn't until MS refused to port Ori 2 to Switch that Moon realised Ori was entirely MS' property. Moon gets frustrated, MS says, "If you can find a publisher willing to fund the port and agree to our revenue terms, fine, but otherwise we're done", iam8bit enters the situation, and Spencer later says that Switch ports "[don't] feel sustainable".

Edit: To clarify, I don't mean to imply that Spencer's comment was spurred by MS' difficulties with Moon, just that it may have been a contributing factor.
 
Last edited:

OldDirtyGamer

Member
Apr 14, 2019
2,505
Why is MS doing something good have to ve turned into something bad ? Literally all the bulkshit going on in the gaming industry and people still fixate on AB. Lots of people not even willing to give MS the chance to fix it.

Yet when other things are going on at other companies , it's forgotten in a week.
 

kruczynski

Member
Sep 21, 2020
1,337
I keep reading people asking why, then, MS purchased Activision, but I think that many ignore the fact that Moon Studios is a very small studio, with the developers literally scattered around the world, working from home since the inception of the studio.
Maybe my take is over-simplistic, but while MS can cut the rotten branches of ABK an reform the culture of the studios to a more welcoming and less toxic environment, same can't be said about Moon Studios: in that case MS should cut the roots, not just the branches, and at that point, not much will remain of Moon (unfortunately).
In any case, nobody spends 70 billion dollars to "save" the abused developers, but if change can be a consequence of the acquisition, so be it, it's more than welcome.

ETA: and before anybody says "Eh, but Kotick". Kotick was going to land on his feet in any case. Only thing that can prevent him from leaving the company with a huge bag of money is if somehow he's found legally responsible of wrongdoing (not even sure about that, tho).
There's time to judge MS' work once the acquisition is done, and even after that, it would take years for them to change the toxic culture in ABK; it's not something one can solve in a couple of years.
 
Last edited:

Nairume

SaGa Sage
Member
Oct 25, 2017
7,159
Nintendo to the rescue.
/s
He was honestly more aggressive with platform warring against them :V

Remember when he made a huge public spectacle about trying to find the maker of AM2R in a way that was blatantly him trying to cash in on the attention it would get him after nintendo hit am2r with a c&d more than it was about doing a cool thing for an indie dev.
 

tokkun

Member
Oct 27, 2017
5,502
The idea that they are somehow culpable in past transgression at Actiblizz and comparing that to this situation is truly galaxy brain stuff tho. (Which you are not doing btw.)

Of course Microsoft are not culpable for the past transgressions occurring.

However, they did choose to take advantage of a drop in stock price resulting from those transgressions in order to buy the company at a steep discount. Which certainly feels like they exploited the situation for a profit.
 

UraMallas

Member
Nov 1, 2017
20,021
United States
Of course Microsoft are not culpable for the past transgressions occurring.

However, they did choose to take advantage of a drop in stock price resulting from those transgressions in order to buy the company at a steep discount. Which certainly feels like they exploited the situation for a profit.
Definitely. That is probably why they are a trillion dollar company. Rich get richer.
 

Sota4077

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account.
Banned
Oct 28, 2017
742
Good on Microsoft for doing that. So, about that Activision acquisition...

What about it? If they own Activision they can enact change. With Moon they had no leverage besides take their money elsewhere and they did. Not sure what your point is here.
 

cyrribrae

Chicken Chaser
Member
Jan 21, 2019
12,723
I don't see how Moon survives any of this, unless this next game is a total departure from what they've made before (it seems so) and is the hugest hit imaginable. What we're seeing here is that Moon is just Thomas and Gennadiy and everyone else is expendable fodder. So what is there to salvage, if the studio can't even play well with external partners? I mean, good to hear from the devs who report things have been better recently, but even the response from Thomas during the internal meeting after VentureBeat asked them questions didn't really inspire confidence.. iono man..

Of course Microsoft are not culpable for the past transgressions occurring.

However, they did choose to take advantage of a drop in stock price resulting from those transgressions in order to buy the company at a steep discount. Which certainly feels like they exploited the situation for a profit.
Undoubtedly. Though, I'd suggest that this moment was significant not just because MS swooped in and took advantage of a low price. But rather that they swooped in to take advantage of a board that was willing to sell the company. Ballmer said just the other day that they had been talking about buying Acti for years (and he stopped being CEO in early 2014). Why would Acti sell when they knew they'd just keep making more money? When that became less guaranteed in the midst of a huge scandal. Correlation, not necessarily causation.

(Even more off topic, I still can't shake the idea that Bobby Kotick may end up walking away with LESS money after the MS acquisition than he would have if he had just quit before the scandal, and maybe even if he had quit after the scandal. That's probably not actually true, but the document that Acti filed with the SEC seems to suggest his severance package with MS dropped from like 260m or whatever to 14.5m, not the 290m that his prior Activision contract said. I mean, iono... but.. just saying. IF Bobby ends up with less money at the end of this, will people support the acquisition then? lol)
 

Iron Eddie

Banned
Nov 25, 2019
9,812
Good on Microsoft for doing that. So, about that Activision acquisition...
What about it? They will now be under Microsoft's watch once the deal passes. You can't do a cleanup before the deal closes but of course you knew that already.

Phil is not going to have this stuff be handled the same way Bobby did. Bobby's main goal was profits and pleasing the board. That is not what Satya Nadella is asking of Phil.
 

Sacul64

One Winged Slayer
Member
Oct 27, 2017
6,877
I don't see how Moon survives any of this, unless this next game is a total departure from what they've made before (it seems so) and is the hugest hit imaginable. What we're seeing here is that Moon is just Thomas and Gennadiy and everyone else is expendable fodder. So what is there to salvage, if the studio can't even play well with external partners? I mean, good to hear from the devs who report things have been better recently, but even the response from Thomas during the internal meeting after VentureBeat asked them questions didn't really inspire confidence.. iono man..

Undoubtedly. Though, I'd suggest that this moment was significant not just because MS swooped in and took advantage of a low price. But rather that they swooped in to take advantage of a board that was willing to sell the company. Ballmer said just the other day that they had been talking about buying Acti for years (and he stopped being CEO in early 2014). Why would Acti sell when they knew they'd just keep making more money? When that became less guaranteed in the midst of a huge scandal. Correlation, not necessarily causation.

(Even more off topic, I still can't shake the idea that Bobby Kotick may end up walking away with LESS money after the MS acquisition than he would have if he had just quit before the scandal, and maybe even if he had quit after the scandal. That's probably not actually true, but the document that Acti filed with the SEC seems to suggest his severance package with MS dropped from like 260m or whatever to 14.5m, not the 290m that his prior Activision contract said. I mean, iono... but.. just saying. IF Bobby ends up with less money at the end of this, will people support the acquisition then? lol)

Of course they wont, some will stop using the excuse about kotics money while others will just keep up the old claims and just not respond to any evidence of it not being true.
 

Lukar

Unshakable Resolve - Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 27, 2017
24,052
its a false equivalency in the sense that giving kotick hundreds of millions of dollars is much, much, much worse. yes.
Please let me know which of these two scenarios you find to be better:
  1. Microsoft purchases Activision Blizzard, pays Kotick to fuck off once the acquisition is complete, and commits to bringing about meaningful and better change in AB's studios.
  2. Microsoft does not purchase Activision Blizzard, Kotick and his kind remain at the company (because they are not going to face justice or be forced out without still making a lot of money, that much is clear), and AB remains a shitty place to work at, with only the bare minimum of effort put in to making things better.
 

Ambient80

The Fallen
Oct 25, 2017
4,748
I love how MS doing a good thing in telling a toxic studio they used to partner with to fuck off is somehow turned into MS being shitty because they *bought* a shitty publisher. Two completely different situations, but a couple of posters managed to steer the thread in that direction.
 

Lausebub

Member
Nov 4, 2017
3,172
Eidos Montreal would be an example. Its a good place to work at from what we know. 4 day weeks, trying to avoid crunch (phrasing it that way because I dont work there). Outside of SE screwing MD up we dont hear anything bad from em to my memory.

I don't think any us can say if they are a good place to work at, if you haven't worked there or heared directly from people working there. All we know is what the company wants us to know and they are not going to tell us about the bad stuff that is or isn't going on there.
 

Yuntu

Prophet of Regret Corrupted by Vengeance
Member
Nov 7, 2019
11,045
Germany
I don't think any us can say if they are a good place to work at, if you haven't worked there or heared directly from people working there. All we know is what the company wants us to know and they are not going to tell us about the bad stuff that is or isn't going on there.

Of course. We can only assume. I don't want to pretend I know how it is for real, don't get me wrong in that regard. I just want to remain hopeful there are good big studios out there to work for.
 

Wordstar

Member
Oct 27, 2017
305
Germany
i knew something was not right with this guy after getting into it with him after the launch of will of the wisps. Although one of my favorite games, his true charakter shines through whenever it can. I could always see though the bullshit.
 

Soj

Member
Oct 27, 2017
10,866
Imagine being so toxic that people no longer want to do business with you even though your games are almost universally acclaimed. Fucking pathetic.
 

ToadPacShakur

Prophet of Truth
Member
Oct 25, 2017
3,497
I love how MS doing a good thing in telling a toxic studio they used to partner with to fuck off is somehow turned into MS being shitty because they *bought* a shitty publisher. Two completely different situations, but a couple of posters managed to steer the thread in that direction.

And if anything, how they handled the Moon situation SHOULD say something good about how they'll handle ActiBlizz.

I mean shit, I'm fairly certain any of the devs/publishers that have had stories come out about them the past few months would LOVE if their biggest reported issue was about how they were too lenient with a studio and had to soft reboot a project…
 
Mar 6, 2021
3,938
Saint Louis
Then I guess MS shouldn't purchase Activision? I mean, sure stand up to Moon. But too much money not to turn away a AAA company. A bit two faced no?

its a false equivalency in the sense that giving kotick hundreds of millions of dollars is much, much, much worse. yes.

I mean, MS has immensly more to gain from the AB acquisition and fix then they would with moon. This isnt a 1 to 1 as a result.

Also, when you look at all of their work, they only have like 8 consistent employees. Much of their team is essentially contract work and any "permanent" position has a near 100% turnover rate. Idk why Xbox would even consider purchasing a studio like that. So again, bringing up AB in this conversation is in bad faith and only aimed at putting Xbox in the wrong
 

Scottoest

Member
Feb 4, 2020
11,571
its a false equivalency in the sense that giving kotick hundreds of millions of dollars is much, much, much worse. yes.

I keep seeing a few people say this but no one is actually elaborating on what the remotely realistic alternative is supposed to be, based on the facts of the situation.

Aside from the empty victory of MS's name not technically being on the check (which it may well not be anyway, depending on when precisely Kotick makes his exit), Bobby is either getting hundreds of millions of dollars to leave - or he's staying, and also getting hundreds of millions of dollars. His contract is terrible, but no amount of justified moral outrage changes what the actual words say on it.

Short of an unexpected criminal indictment (which would be welcomed by any corporation inheriting Kotick's contract, since they could probably fire him for cause at that point), the only "justice" you're likely to see here is the cessation of further harm by Kotick via his golden parachute off the plane. It's a fucking awful situation that shines a light on the sick disparity in "justice" in the United States for white-collar business criminal assholes, but it's the situation.

If people are against the acquisition that's fine, and I harbour some trepidation of my own. But just... say that. Microsoft could walk away from the entire thing tomorrow (figuratively, I don't know if legally they actually could now) and Bobby is still going to get his money.