Because he's a Parseltongue and Slytherin and has a connection with snakes?And why would Voldemort put a piece of his soul in a random snake?
Chosen one and the hottest of the original cast.
Admittedly, if it was his pet snake from when he was kid and only friend or something like that?And why would Voldemort put a piece of his soul in a random snake?
Cuz he speaks snake, and that girl could spill some tea!And why would Voldemort put a piece of his soul in a random snake?
Who says both can't be true?I just don't like how it makes it seem like Nagini is cursed and has a horrible fate considering that Rowling made it seem that Nagini and Voldemort actually had a loving pet relationship.
True.
This seems uncessary but it's more like something that is part of the Bible of Harry Potter that was never shown because there never was any reason to show it rather than anything else.
the Nagini~~Naga connection works and I don't think Rowling is a bad enough writer to not have made the connection originally when she wrote it at first.
The issue is more about how shoddy Rowling's research is to confuse India, Korea, China and Indonesia.
Also true. I said this in the last thread about it, but if this counts as a retcon, it's only the mildest of retcon. The only change is that the assumption Dumbledore made about Nagini was wrong.
So he finds all of this special magic stuff to use as a horcrux and then just a snake that he found?Because he's a Parseltongue and Slytherin and has a connection with snakes?
Should've just left Nagini the fuck alone. The original story was fine just as it was before we found out Vold showed Belatrix his wand.
Maybe they had a loving relationship!I just don't like how it makes it seem like Nagini is cursed and has a horrible fate considering that Rowling made it seem that Nagini and Voldemort actually had a loving pet relationship.
$50 she does some kung fu magic shit. Or is part of a circus.How many lines will she be have? or is her role just the subservient Asian deadly female archetype?
Next we're gonna find out Hedwig was actually Dumbledores wife and Dumbledore told her to remain an owl to watch over Harry
More like ew.Mmm yes we haven't even started discussing the fact that she gave Voldemort a daughter. Whew.
Again
The whole let's take an actress from the area that Nagas are from to play up the connection for a character named after Nagas works.The issue is more about how shoddy Rowling's research is to confuse India, Korea, China and Indonesia.
I mean. Belatrix wanting to fuck Voldemort was pretty explicit in the books. J.K revealing that didn't really change anything.Should've just left Nagini the fuck alone. The original story was fine just as it was before we found out Vold showed Belatrix his wand.
JK Rowling is literally the modern.... but worse... George Lucas my god.
Yes? Every horcrux has a meaning to Voldemort, and I assumed Nagini simply represented his connection and ability to talk to snakes.So he finds all of this special magic stuff to use as a horcrux and then just a snake that he found?
For me that will always be Yoshio Sakamoto and no I'm never going to shut up about Metroid Other M.JK Rowling is literally the modern.... but worse... George Lucas my god.
I still lol at the idea that Voldemort has a daughter.Mmm yes we haven't even started discussing the fact that she gave Voldemort a daughter. Whew.
Not really. Prequels are largely about fleshing out everything we've seen in the existing films, both including things we actively want to know more about, and things we never really gave much thought to.
Her Maledictus status was only confirmed recently, after the trailer dropped. Rowling hinted in the past that there was more to Nagini than we knew.
Hopefully there's deeper connection between Voldemort and Nagini or yeah it's a George Lucas move.Yes? Every horcrux has a meaning to Voldemort, and I assumed Nagini simply represented his connection and ability to talk to snakes.
Not that he chose her because she was once a human who was cursed omg what a tragique past
That's not really a retcon, though. "Dumbledore made an assumption, and it was incorrect" is just expanding on the story.And then Dumbledore revealed the snake was a Horcrux. Citing her abnormal as the reason for his suspicion
And now it turns out Dumbledore was just wrong and didn't know or consider the possibility that she was a Maledictus before sending Harry and Co. On a death quest to kill.
It's a bad retcon. It's not super terrible but it is bad
I'll be waiting for the "20 years in the making" tweet tbhRowling nails another "I was being diverse all along" reveal.
Can't wait for Rowena Ravenclaw to be revealed as trans.
What if she pulled a Wong?
I wouldn't hold my breath for the last one there...Rowling nails another "I was being diverse all along" reveal.
Can't wait for Rowena Ravenclaw to be revealed as trans.
Next we're gonna find out Hedwig was actually Dumbledores wife and Dumbledore told her to remain an owl to watch over Harry
Nagini was clearly not a normal snake in the books. I don't know why people act like this is out of nowhere. We don't even know anything about the character yet an people just get mad at a bunch of assumptions.
How many lines will she be have? or is her role just the subservient Asian deadly female archetype?
We don't know anything. How the hell do you know how Nagini is written as a character.Given that JK has made a big song and dance about Dumbledore being Gay without actually showing it, I hope that she does that shit.
Now that will rile up the LBGT community, with JK making some nonsensical excuse to justify it.
You're missing the point, people aren't mad about the damn snake having a backstory. They're mad about the fact in a series about Wizards and racism, with Voldemort being a Hitler stand in, but the heroes are all white with PoC given background character roles or written unfavorably.
JK doesn't care about creating a diverse world and will only mention it off hand but not show it while picking and matching other people culture because it will be a good fit for her world.
She was already called out for how she showcased Native Americans in her world, causally mentioning Dumbledore being gay or South Asian Wizards riding flying carpets.
Given that JK has made a big song and dance about Dumbledore being Gay without actually showing it, I hope that she does that shit.
Now that will rile up the LBGT community, with JK making some nonsensical excuse to justify it.
You're missing the point, people aren't mad about the damn snake having a backstory. They're mad about the fact in a series about Wizards and racism, with Voldemort being a Hitler stand in, but the heroes are all white with PoC given background character roles or written unfavorably.
JK doesn't care about creating a diverse world and will only mention it off hand but not show it while picking and matching other people culture because it will be a good fit for her world.
She was already called out for how she showcased Native Americans in her world, causally mentioning Dumbledore being gay or South Asian Wizards riding flying carpets.
If she's a secret magical ninja I legit give up on this series.The articles I linked address these. She is indeed part of a circus, and one of the article addresses the fact that we have yet another "deadly dragon lady" Asian woman.
But it contradicts nothing. Thus, it's not a retcon by the most commonly used definition.It's a retcon because Rowling clearly never thought of the character as originally human when writing the books. Hence why every passage explaining why Nagini was special made zero mention of a human past.
Um, ackshually, Grindewald is the Hitler stand in, right down to him being causing havoc across Europe during the forties until Dumbeldore defeated him in 1945,
JK Rowling is literally the modern.... but worse... George Lucas my god.