Hear me out. Why not just have a different adult Spider-Man in the Venomverse? Surely we are at a point where the general audience wont be confused by 2 live action spider-men with Spider-Verse being more mainstream.
They can just get Andrew Garfield for the Venom-verseHear me out. Why not just have a different adult Spider-Man in the Venomverse? Surely we are at a point where the general audience wont be confused by 2 live action spider-men with Spider-Verse being more mainstream.
On Era? It's a comic book super hero movie that isn't part of the MCU.
Think bigger. Think Spidey and Venom up against Carnage. It'd be glorious.Venom was bad-dumb, except for Hardy's glorious performance, but...
GIVE ME CLASSIC BLACK SUIT SPIDEY ALREADY YOU FUCKS
With how they treated Venom and Brock in the latest movie the only way I see this working is as a co-op against Carnage.
Or they'd need a really good writer to create a convincing heel turn after that heroic Venom movie.
I mean, he still eats human beings. Spider-Man is probably opposed to cannibalism.
It's up to Sony because the contract with Marvel is up in the air now.
The original deal was for them to share Spidey with Marvel for 5 movies, you had Civil War, Avengers, Homecoming, Endgame, and now Far From Home, so they have to either decide to renew the contract or what they want to do (hence why they say it's up to Sony).
Sony can choose not to renew the contract and they are free to use Spiderman however they see fit, with Venom, whatever. However WITH the contract (at least the one they had) Marvel were the ones who had the creative control, they got to pick the cast, director, basically shape the story they wanted told with Spiderman.
This was a win win for both sides, Sony got good Spiderman movies out of it, they even got to keep 100% of the profits from the stand alone Spiderman movies. Marvel on the other hand got to use arguably one of the most famous superheros in the MCU and they got all the money from the merchandise (even if Sony doesn't renew the contract Marvel has these rights, Sony doesn't 'see a dime from any of the toys/shirts or anything).
We don't know yet if Sony is renewing it or what, but they'd be stupid to just wall him back off into Sony's movies and keep him out of the MCU and things.
we should be glad we'll get 1 MCU spidey trilogy, because after that it's straight to the trash heap
I don't know why people thought it was so necessary to change the subject line. If it's up to Sony, then it's going to happen. Sony wanted to make a Morbius movie and a Sinister Six cinematic universe......of course they are going to do Venom v. Spidey.
Okay, there was one header before the current one that just included the "Seems likely" bit, that seemed tame enough.The original subject line had a FAKE QUOTE Feige never said. It said something like "Tom Holland's Spider-Man WILL Meet Tom Hardy's Venom". In quotes. Feige never said that at all.
I don't know why people thought it was so necessary to change the subject line. If it's up to Sony, then it's going to happen. Sony wanted to make a Morbius movie and a Sinister Six cinematic universe......of course they are going to do Venom v. Spidey.
I would love thatDefinitely can't see Brock teaming up with five other bad guys to take Spidey out, either. He's more likely to side with Spidey against the Sinister Six.
Yeah, Venom was fine. It wasn't spectacular, but it wasn't awful either like some of the hyperbole here would lead some to believe. It was a solid 6/10 for me. Maybe originally I liked it a bit less, but I rewatched it recently and came around to it a little more. If it was in the MCU, I'd still rank it in the lower third or so, but it was fine.I am not as skeptical as some people. If it does happen, I will watch and judge then. I thought Venom was decent so there is that.
This is amazing news because it means we have a new front runner in the argument or worst mcu film, venom!
Hardy is great in it and I love his take on the personality divide but the movie was worse than Thor 2 for me.
Lot of mixed messages around the contract so I wouldn't be sure about that. Sony is financing the solo Spider-Man movies so I would be shocked if he is somehow signed with marvel for those movies as well. He could be signed with marvel for the shared stuff like civil war and avengers stuff.This is not true.
The 5 movies thing was started by CosmicBookNews (who has since deleted their video because Pascal and Holland debunked it).
Holland's contract is with Marvel for 6 movies. Not 5. He has a third solo Spider-Man movie (and people will be wildly speculating about its plot in a couple of weeks).
Lot of mixed messages around the contract so I wouldn't be sure about that. Sony is financing the solo Spider-Man movies so I would be shocked if he is somehow signed with marvel for those movies as well. He could be signed with marvel for the shared stuff like civil war and avengers stuff.
Couple of articles mentioning far from home is the last of the contract as well so we do not know if it was extended(most likely) or not.
"The current, complicated deal that was struck between Marvel, Sony, and Disney (which owns Marvel) is at present only for Spider-Man: Homecoming, its sequel, Civil War, and the two Avengers movies. If all goes well, they'll come back to the table and renegotiate to keep this going. Or it's possible that Sony says "we'll take it from here" and Peter Parker disappears from the MCU altogether."
Plus we have the guy working on kraven script saying he is writing with Spider-Man in mind.
So Amy pascal saying the partnership may not continue after the sequel doesn't count lol. Like I said it most likely has been extended because that would be the smart thing to do and Tom Holland is probably just avoiding complications by saying he is signed for six films. He is not going to spell out the contract saying he is signed for three films with marvel and three with Sony and he can't act in Sony stand-alone spin-off during a certain period etc... the fact is we don't know. I am sure the sequel sets up things nicely for a third movie and continues the partnership.I believe the guy who signed the contract more than speculation from websites.
Holland says he signed for six movies. No reason to doubt him since he's the guy who signed it.
Also, people might want to watch the second Spider-Man movie before making declarations about what is or is not happening with the third.
So Amy pascal saying the partnership may not continue after the sequel doesn't count lol. Like I said it most likely has been extended because that would be the smart thing to do and Tom Holland is probably just avoiding complications by saying he is signed for six films. He is not going to spell out the contract saying he is signed for three films with marvel and three with Sony and he can't act in Sony stand-alone spin-off during a certain period etc... the fact is we don't know. I am sure the sequel sets up things nicely for a third movie and continues the partnership.
It wouldn't be too far off base to say that most things Amy Pascal has said doesn't count or was potentially inaccurate, since she thought the Venom movie was in the MCU originally.So Amy pascal saying the partnership may not continue after the sequel doesn't count lol. Like I said it most likely has been extended because that would be the smart thing to do and Tom Holland is probably just avoiding complications by saying he is signed for six films. He is not going to spell out the contract saying he is signed for three films with marvel and three with Sony and he can't act in Sony stand-alone spin-off during a certain period etc... the fact is we don't know. I am sure the sequel sets up things nicely for a third movie and continues the partnership.