Could be worse like paying €80 in the EU for this.
Could be worse like paying €80 in the EU for this.
People always say epic bad
Won't someone think of the feelings of the big corp!
I initially assumed all of the DRM and related API calls to EOS were in the game. But that clearly doesn't make much sense.
Gonna shove Tim Epic in a locker and give him a swirly
Won't somebody please think of Tim Epic!?
Not for metrics, but as a form of DRM.is S-E using epic services just for metrics and refuses to launch the executable without being able to connect to them?
so this is likely more an issue of S-E incompetence than something inherent about epic services?
Not really incompetence. They wanted some form of DRM. Adding in online-only DRM via EOS is free. Adding Denuvo or any form of DRM that actually delays crackers by more than a few hours costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. They're cheap fucks.so this is likely more an issue of S-E incompetence than something inherent about epic services?
So we're back to the days of pirates having a better experience than paying customers. Sigh.
Oh snap why aren't we bullying corporations more
This is SE cheaping out on Denuvo and instead opting for online DRM, but Epic must be the devil in all cases according to Era.
Epic has an offline mode and many games work just fine even with the launcher off. Take your issue up with Square adding the always online req rather than continuing the hurr epic bad circlejerk.
As I understand, someone can correct me if I'm wrong, the "crack" is an EOS emulator, all the calls are there, but they are calling the wrong number that it's pretending to be the real one.Won't someone think of the feelings of the big corp!
I initially assumed all of the DRM and related API calls to EOS were in the game. But that clearly doesn't make much sense.
I definitely don't have a grasp between the differences between retail and cracked games lmfao.
Yeah, Epic's DRM.This is SE cheaping out on Denuvo and instead opting for online DRM, but Epic must be the devil in all cases according to Era.
factsI'm convinced people use the term 'to be fair' just to add their own opinion. It's usually never fair nor about balancing the topic.
Framing this post
Which is optional and SE chooses to implement in a way that does not allow offline access.
Whose DRM are they using then?This is SE cheaping out on Denuvo and instead opting for online DRM, but Epic must be the devil in all cases according to Era.
i don't think anybody here is happy with SE.
Or y'know, blame both parties at fault.So childish.
The issue is you're barking up the wrong tree. It's SE you should be pissed at.
Actually I can be pissed at Epic too for having a shitty service.So childish.
The issue is you're barking up the wrong tree. It's SE you should be pissed at.
Right?
No, you're completely right. I've been defending square to the hilt.But, y'know, that's not what that poster was doing and it's not what you've been saying either.
Imagine that the first thing that came to your mind is defending Epic/SE for not implementing offline mode for a single player only game.