Money should never be an factor when it comes to education.They are sunk costs, but it would have been a complete waste of years of my life and thousands of dollars if debt is forgiven. If I took loans out instead, for example, I would have had a college education that was effectively free (if forgiven) and I would OWN a house. Instead, having paid for it myself, I'd just have a degree which is being devalued by the fact more people are getting it, and I'd just be out a ton of money and years of my life. It makes it all meaningless as it takes me from having paid and worked to get ahead to now someone that's behind as others are getting it for nothing and will not have to incur those same costs.
Well, they are? Even if we assume a slightly natty MMT theory of economics where you deficit spend to your heart's content and only concern yourself with inflation, this would be eating into that inflationary allowance that could be spent elsewhere. There's always an opportunity cost.It was discouraging to see so many debt-free posters express that they feel like they're losing something by others having their debt cancelled. I'm very lucky in that this wouldn't personally affect me, but it would be wonderful to see.
I don't know about private student loans, but for federal ones there is a whole online thing you're required to complete (before you can get the loan) that gives you estimated monthly payment amounts and all that stuff.What I don't get is why there isn't legislation or whatever to force the companies giving out loans to at least approximate the amount someone is going to have to payout based on the amount they're taking out. Or at least some mandatory education in high school on interest rates, payments, college loans, credit cards, taxes etc., if not to the students then the parents. Like we know this is a huge decision for a 17/18 year old to make and you'd think one of the first steps would be education/transparency, but someone earlier in the thread said that when they got the loan they wouldn't even tell him the approximate payments until right before he had to start paying.
They are sunk costs, but it would have been a complete waste of years of my life and thousands of dollars if debt is forgiven. If I took loans out instead, for example, I would have had a college education that was effectively free (if forgiven) and I would OWN a house. Instead, having paid for it myself, I'd just have a degree which is being devalued by the fact more people are getting it, and I'd just be out a ton of money and years of my life. It makes it all meaningless as it takes me from having paid and worked to get ahead to now someone that's behind as others are getting it for nothing and will not have to incur those same costs.
How is this for a compromise, which may require a change in the way the US tax system works but is not beyond the wit of man because it's basically how it works in the UK: the government take over all the debt. Rather than cancelling it, they charge a de facto tax (let's say 10%) to those with an outstanding debt payable on their earnings above the median. So if the median salary is $30,000, and you earn $40,000, you'll pay $1,000 a year or ~$85 a month. If you drop below this threshold (IE lose your job, take a less well paid job, take time off to raise children etc) you don't pay until you go back to earning over it. An interest rate equal to the rate of inflation is applied to the debt and nothing more. Those who earn a lot will pay all theirs back, those who do not will pay what they can and the rest of the cost will be socialised. No one will pay it when they can't afford it and no one would be barred from going in the first place because the payments are now more affordable.
Well, they are? Even if we assume a slightly natty MMT theory of economics where you deficit spend to your heart's content and only concern yourself with inflation, this would be eating into that inflationary allowance that could be spent elsewhere. There's always an opportunity cost.
Nice straw man. I bet you thought that was a good post hoping I'd actually argue against it, lol.So?
"I got ripped off and demand you get bent over a barrel as well" is one of the least compelling arguments I've ever heard.
Nice straw man. I bet you thought that was a good post hoping I'd actually argue against it, lol.
Ctrl + f... Quote only found in your post. Weird."Straw man". That's literally what you said. "I wasted years of my life so why shouldn't you?"
You're not going to argue against it because you can't .
So reading more on this, this plan only covers federal loan debt, not private loan debt.
College is almost a requirement if you want jobs that just 15 years ago never required a college degree. It's a de facto requirement for the current job market. All while states have gutted support of colleges, in part leading to skyrocketing tuition costs, etc.Ctrl + f... Quote only found in your post. Weird.
No, that's not literally what I said. That's a heavy twisting of what I said. College is an investment, not a right, and if you're not willing to invest, then that should be your problem and not one passed on to others to foot your bill via taxes so you can get ahead without any skin in the game. It's called personal responsibility. If we're going to give out free college, then why not free homes, cars, alleviate credit card debts. Free is never the answer.
The other thing I mentioned is devaluation, several times in fact, but I'm assuming you're going to run to Google to find out what educational creep is right after reading this. Everyone getting a college education means higher requirements for jobs, not everyone getting good jobs. It literally devalues what others worked for. Maybe you want to work in a world where a BS in finance is required to be a minimum wage cashier, but not me.
Edit: I also didn't say that I wasted years of my life so others should. The idea was that it would become a waste and I would be screwed over if what I worked for was just given away. Currently it is not and I'd like it to remain that way.
College is almost a requirement if you want jobs that just 15 years ago never required a college degree. It's a de facto requirement for the current job market. All while states have gutted support of colleges, in part leading to skyrocketing tuition costs, etc.
It is quite well known that many employers are making a college degree a de facto requirement. Hell even entry level jobs with a degree requirement are demanding experience to go along with it. All well known stuff.I've seen this repeated by a few people in this thread. It's literally untrue, but I'm guessing you're implying something else — like, as a singular example, you're referring to 'good' jobs as opposed to all available jobs. Care to elaborate?
Ctrl + f... Quote only found in your post. Weird.
No, that's not literally what I said. That's a heavy twisting of what I said. College is an investment, not a right, and if you're not willing to invest, then that should be your problem and not one passed on to others to foot your bill via taxes so you can get ahead without any skin in the game. It's called personal responsibility. If we're going to give out free college, then why not free homes, cars, alleviate credit card debts. Free is never the answer.
The other thing I mentioned is devaluation, several times in fact, but I'm assuming you're going to run to Google to find out what educational creep is right after reading this. Everyone getting a college education means higher requirements for jobs, not everyone getting good jobs. It literally devalues what others worked for. Maybe you want to work in a world where a BS in finance is required to be a minimum wage cashier, but not me.
Edit: I also didn't say that I wasted years of my life so others should. The idea was that it would become a waste and I would be screwed over if what I worked for was just given away. Currently it is not and I'd like it to remain that way.
One, you're a selfish asshole.Ctrl + f... Quote only found in your post. Weird.
No, that's not literally what I said. That's a heavy twisting of what I said. College is an investment, not a right, and if you're not willing to invest, then that should be your problem and not one passed on to others to foot your bill via taxes so you can get ahead without any skin in the game. It's called personal responsibility. If we're going to give out free college, then why not free homes, cars, alleviate credit card debts. Free is never the answer.
The other thing I mentioned is devaluation, several times in fact, but I'm assuming you're going to run to Google to find out what educational creep is right after reading this. Everyone getting a college education means higher requirements for jobs, not everyone getting good jobs. It literally devalues what others worked for. Maybe you want to work in a world where a BS in finance is required to be a minimum wage cashier, but not me.
Edit: I also didn't say that I wasted years of my life so others should. The idea was that it would become a waste and I would be screwed over if what I worked for was just given away. Currently it is not and I'd like it to remain that way.