Yes, I did. I suppose I just have trouble when people refer to things in any medium of entertainment as "overrated". It not resonating with you or appealing to what you're seeking is understandable, but I don't think that just because Black Panther received universal critical acclaim, awards nominations and was spoken of in somewhat hyperbolic terms and lavished with laudatory proclamations means that the film was overrated. It's a somewhat semantic argument but I feel people who claimed it was Citizen Kane were a vocal minority on the extreme end in those who were positive towards it.Why do you think I don't feel that way about Infinity War and Endgame? You read the second part of my post right?
Black Panther was a lot better than Infinity War. That's not saying much though, since Infinity War was overlong, boring and ADD on film. Thanos was awful in it too.
I haven't seen Endgame or Captain Marvel.
Most MCU movies aren't that great and are highly overrated. Only some stand out. I prefer Iron Man, the Guardians movies and maybe Ant-Man because I love Paul Rudd. Civil War is the only good Avengers movie.
Why do I say that BP is highly overrated? Because people treat it like it's the new Citizen Kane when it's not even close to that level or Best Picture level. It was good sure, and better than most MCU movies, but that's not a high bar. It's no masterpiece
Don't agree at all. The only thing I would see an argument for is production design. In my opinion the score of Black Panther and certainly the acting is a far cry above GOTG.
Yes, I did. I suppose I just have trouble when people refer to things in any medium of entertainment as "overrated". It not resonating with you or appealing to what you're seeking is understandable, but I don't think that just because Black Panther received universal critical acclaim, awards nominations and was spoken of in somewhat hyperbolic terms and lavished with laudatory proclamations means that the film was overrated. It's a somewhat semantic argument but I feel people who claimed it was Citizen Kane were a vocal minority on the extreme end in those who were positive towards it.
Personally speaking that judgement can be made but opinion isn't fact. The fact is Black Panther was graded highly across the cinematic community... so were they judging the film on merit alone, against other offerings in the genre or grading on a scale? Citizen Kane or a masterpiece it is not, that is hyperbole and only a handful of films throughout history can lay claim to that designation. I'd argue based on the offerings last year and the films that were selected for best picture, Black Panther wasn't out of place however.
The Ant Man films do nothing for me but I would put the original Iron Man, Guardians 1, Civil War (as well as Winter Soldier) at the top of the MCU along with Black Panther.
I agree with you that the majority of the MCU don't qualify as great speaking strictly from a cinematic perspective. They simply lack the well written narratives, structure and ambition to do so. For me, when it comes to the genre of comicbook movies, Black Panther offers something (and maybe it was only a glimpse to some) that pushes the envelop forward when it comes to these types of films and the types of stories they can put forth on the big screen from a thematic perspective. I hope that, from the perspective of being a great film first and foremost, Black Panther 2 can further push that envelop forward and distance itself from typical MCU and CBM tropes.
I mean, he's not wrong. Thanos is a one-note villain whose entire motive is devoid of any depth. And not exactly well thought through, honestly.
It frustrates and irritates me to no end that the aspirational progressive ideal nation in the MCU is governed by a dynastic monarchy, with the sole potential exception of challenge by single combat. That shit is absurdly regressive and just plain fucking awful, and I can't get past it enough to enjoy the story.
He's my favorite character in a superhero universe that includes fucking Spider-Man.
I'm still mad too.
Yea it's my favorite of the MCU. It has its issues, but it gets beyond the typical superhero fantasy stuff and offers some challenging themes, like the African American ancestral void (Killmonger's ancestral plane scene is the best scene in entire MCU), abandonment of children (for political reasons, woo boy is that relevant), violent and toxic masculinity, colonialism, and so on. And the superhero power stuff that is there is re-contextualized with an all black cast, allowing us to see them as the strongest and smartest and most capable people in a massive blockbuster film. It's good shit.
Does the movie pretend that Wakanda is an "ideal" society? The entire narrative is about how a core component of their national policy is a complete and total moral failure, a failure that has created a grave existential threat.
What other villains does Black Panther have, anyway? Killmonger and Klaue are dead, and Mbaku is an ally. So who can they have in the sequel?
I'm pretty sure that the narrative shows how shitty this system is by quickly showing how Erik ended up being a king and how Mbaku and it's people we're outcasts in their own country because of it.It frustrates and irritates me to no end that the aspirational idealized progressive nation in the MCU is governed by a dynastic monarchy, with the sole potential exception of challenge by single combat. That shit is absurdly regressive and just plain fucking awful, and I can't get past it enough to enjoy the story.
I'm pretty sure that the narrative shows how shitty this system is by quickly showing how Erik ended up being a king and how Mbaku and it's people we're outcasts in their own country because of it.
I hope they steal this aspect from Coates's run.
It frustrates and irritates me to no end that the aspirational idealized progressive nation in the MCU is governed by a dynastic monarchy, with the sole potential exception of challenge by single combat. That shit is absurdly regressive and just plain fucking awful, and I can't get past it enough to enjoy the story.
Like How Cap goes toe to toe with the Red Skull? Or any of the Thor movies?
I'm sorry, was Cap fighting for the presidency of the United States?
He was fighting to end nazi's trying to blow up the world. You tell me what was more important.
Same thing in Ironman 1 and 3. Battle for dominance.
I am specifically critiquing the asinine notions of hereditary governance and of ordinary people being governed by whichever asshole can punch hardest. This has nothing to do with the moral case for just war.
how so?Black panther cheated on the succession fight against Killmonger and he didn't have the right for a rematch.
how so?
I don't think it was ever thought of a "rematch" anyway. Technically, the fight never ended.
The movie only came out a year ago as you mentioned. Why wouldn't it hold up?The movie still holds up and is still as powerful as it was a year ago.
Now, brace yourself for the usual ERA suspects to tell you why it's not.
I thought you meant during the fight itself, my b.Dude, what kind of a fair fight is it if one of the participants who by all means should be dead already is allowed to be nursed back to full health by others mid-fight? Not to mention even before the referee intervened directly onto the match.
But they had to fight in an underground railroadThey should've just fought at the same waterfall ritual place instead
It frustrates and irritates me to no end that the aspirational idealized progressive nation in the MCU is governed by a dynastic monarchy, with the sole potential exception of challenge by single combat. That shit is absurdly regressive and just plain fucking awful, and I can't get past it enough to enjoy the story.
I am specifically critiquing the asinine notions of hereditary governance and of ordinary people being governed by whichever asshole can punch hardest. This has nothing to do with the moral case for just war.
Isn't the entire thing about Wakanda that they have never had a war or even a conflict since its founding? Why would they value a forgeign warrior king over someone who actually knows diplomacy, Wakandan technology, etc? They hardly even need warriors.Isn't the ruler of Wakanda also its protector? I guess in that sense it can make sense why they want a powerful warrior.
Isn't the entire thing about Wakanda that they have never had a war or even a conflict since its founding? Why would they value a forgeign warrior king over someone who actually knows diplomacy, Wakandan technology, etc? They hardly even need warriors.