Oh, of course. I'm not saying "Lolita" and this work are the same in terms of authorial intent, I'm just saying that in places of art, you're bound to find something that feels like it crosses your personal boundaries. But, from there, your action shouldn't be asking for its removal. The complainer's other course of action, asking for a plaque or something to explain its significance in this time, also doesn't feel right, because it betrays the painter's intent. Balthus didn't paint this as a reaction to the events unfolding now nor was he likely aware of i happening in his timet. It's just an unfortunate recontextualization of a piece, but that doesn't mean the piece gets to have its entire meaning changed.
At the end of the day, it comes down to intent for me. Balthus says he didn't paint these works with pedophilic intent, rather choosing to explore an uncomfortable topic in modern society. A work that was created without this intent shouldn't be redefined as a work with it.