Right them being blatant about their "insider knowledge" is what I was referring to in my post.
They then clearly lied about it.
But isn't this evidence that: they had nothing to do with the hack itself.. they had no direct involvement with Russia in this hack? They after the fact seemed to have found out about it with the rest of the world and then shadily contacted wikileaks about it and got into contact with them.
Other than lying like idiots about all of it to investigators when caught, what have Stone and Corsi done?
The twitter thread from Renato Mariotti (previously posted in the Manafort thread here has some of the breakdown of what legal exposure they could have, depending on when they knew, what they knew, and how they contributed to the conspiracy. Remember, this is only the information being released by Corsi, and only relates to the later email dumps, not the initial announcement of the hack or the first dumps.
Much more if you follow the tweets.
At the very least, Corsi and Stone tried to mislead federal investigators and congressional committees by fabricating the story that Randy Credico was their source for Wiki-related information. That in and of itself is a crime.
The email string raises further questions - how did Roger Stone know who to contact, in July 2016, to get directly in touch with Julian Assange? There is obviously more that the FBI knows, and more than Corsi/Stone aren't telling us. Their relationship with Assange did not stop and start in this 10 day window.