Timmins was on TSN 690:
- jizzed over Kotkaniemi
- had some pre-cum for Tkachuk
- was flaccid on Hughes; said he doesn't think he'll be able to defend in the NHL
What budget?
That looks like puck physics being programmed
Either way Dorion must feel pretty fucking jilted right now.I really wonder how that Hoffman deal went down, since Dorion was instructed not to talk to teams in his own division. Did Tallon put out a signal for help, and Wilson scooped it up? Or did Wilson let divisional GMs know he would work the trade as a go-between?
7th Dman or AHL bound
easy to trade with that salary if we dont need him though
Damn, that's a bit of a paycut for him. But being the 4th string goalie in the organization this past season will do that to him.
Damn, that's a bit of a paycut for him. But being the 4th string goalie in the organization this past season will do that to him.
My god I wish we had our 29th pick if only to roll the dice on Merkley, even though he really does seem like the guy who will make the news in 5 years after he gets cut from his Swiss team for arguing with the coach during a game.
Apparently Wilson was calling people.I really wonder how that Hoffman deal went down, since Dorion was instructed not to talk to teams in his own division. Did Tallon put out a signal for help, and Wilson scooped it up? Or did Wilson let divisional GMs know he would work the trade as a go-between?
Still don't know what Dubas is going to do with the goalie logjam. Backup goalies don't have a ton of value and there isn't a big market for them, tho if I had to guess he'll sell high-ish on McBackup for like a 4th or 5th round pick and let Sparks and Pickard fight for the backup spot in camp.I'm mostly expecting to lose him to waivers at the beginning of the year.
For every reason one might have to dislike Merkley, there's an equally valid reason to like him. Despite coming with the "risky pick" label, Merkley carries an expected likelihood of success of 66% via the prospect Graduation Probabilities System (pGPS), which would actually make him one of the safest picks of the draft from a statistical standpoint.
Who's a comparable to Merkley?
I can't recall a guy who was talked about as being a Top 3-5 pick, but sank this low because of 'intangibles'.
Who's a comparable to Merkley?
I can't recall a guy who was talked about as being a Top 3-5 pick, but sank this low because of 'intangibles'.
Just checked the rankings and I didn't realize Merkley had fallen so far. Maybe he's a possibility at 25.
I dunno if having a "bad attitude" at 17 years old is really a death sentence for a players career. He's a kid with some growing up to do. He wouldn't be in a pro league for another 2 or 3 years and people change a lot from 17-19 or 20. I have a feeling whoever gives him a chance will be glad they did.
CanucksArmy:Timmins was on TSN 690:
- jizzed over Kotkaniemi
- had some pre-cum for Tkachuk
- was flaccid on Hughes; said he doesn't think he'll be able to defend in the NHL
He seems to be pretty divisive. A fancy stats darling, but some NHL scouts have the traditional concerns about defending while small.Some people might look at Hughes' small stature and reputation as a dynamic offensive player and assume he has deficiencies on the defensive side of the game. They would be wrong. While his occasional turnovers make him riskier in the neutral zone than his peers and his small frame can result in struggles to win puck battles at times, Hughes' defending is excellent. His speed makes him a tenacious and dedicated backchecker, and he has an active stick which he uses to break up passing plays. As you might expect, his speed and puck skills also mean that once he regains possession, the puck doesn't stay in his own zone for long.
Can someone expand on Merkleys "attitude " (copyright Marc Bergevin)?
No one seems to go into detail. I saw the stick swinging incident but that's all.
Can someone expand on Merkleys "attitude " (copyright Marc Bergevin)?
No one seems to go into detail. I saw the stick swinging incident but that's all.
The most "detailed" I have seen is that sometimes he ignores coach directions to do his own thing, he doesn't pay much attention to the defensive zone, and he can get overly emotional (mad) on the ice at times.
Just checked the rankings and I didn't realize Merkley had fallen so far. Maybe he's a possibility at 25.
I dunno if having a "bad attitude" at 17 years old is really a death sentence for a players career. He's a kid with some growing up to do. He wouldn't be in a pro league for another 2 or 3 years and people change a lot from 17-19 or 20. I have a feeling whoever gives him a chance will be glad they did.
Merkley is going to absolutely wreck the Italian league 5 years from now along with DeAngelo and Ho-Sang
That.....doesn't sound that bad? All things that will come with maturity/pro coaching?
I did not say any such thing. I said he was one of the most talented players in the draft... first overall potential.
Nah, teams will draft character over skill... shit happened with grigorenko... look at how far he fell!
I'd take him because he's as talented as McDavid. Skill can't be taught, but you CAN make a person humble.
He's the only player in the draft likely to be a franchise player, imo.