I dont know maybe some expect Nintendo would let em transfer their old VC purchAses for free?? And will riot if they dont?I really don't get the fixation with VC. Why are people so eager to pay for the same games every 5 years? There are literally hundreds of ways to play that old stuff, and most of them are better than Nintendo's offerings.
If only there were some nifty home console / portable hybrid made by Nintendo that would be very convenient to officially play your favorite old games both at home and on the go.I really don't get the fixation with VC. Why are people so eager to pay for the same games every 5 years? There are literally hundreds of ways to play that old stuff, and most of them are better than Nintendo's offerings.
I'm imagining Netflix-style VC as a service with classic games from across their entire history. At the very least, the full complement of Wii U VC games, and hopefully many more (GameCube etc). Now we have 20 NES games as a throw-in for the 20 dollar per year online service, with a promise of "more to come". There is a pretty big gulf there.Outside of them explicitly saying they will be adding new games regularly?
Agreed that they don't really like to get into nitty-gritty details, but I don't feel it'd be out of character for them to say something like 'enhance the online match experience'. I don't think they have (though I'm not certain of this).I dunno, Nintendo doesn't seem to typically share details like that. It could be possible that Splatoon 2 is updated to dedicated servers quietly along with the new expansion, who knows.
But seeing that MS and Sony don't have dedicated servers for all their games makes me doubtful now. Like, I thought that was the entire purpose of paid online. What the hell are people paying for if not server costs?
Having to pay $20 for a bunch of games I don't want, which might include 1 or 2 I do want
I promise you that the Switch can do more with 800mb of RAM than the PS3 could do with 50mb. For God's sake, the Vita could do voice chat during games with less memory for both games and its OS than the Switch has for its OS alone. They just don't want to do it, please stop spreading misinformation.
I want portable SNES games, that's it.I really don't get the fixation with VC. Why are people so eager to pay for the same games every 5 years? There are literally hundreds of ways to play that old stuff, and most of them are better than Nintendo's offerings.
In this case the Portable factor is very very intriguing to me.I really don't get the fixation with VC. Why are people so eager to pay for the same games every 5 years? There are literally hundreds of ways to play that old stuff, and most of them are better than Nintendo's offerings.
I really don't get the fixation with VC. Why are people so eager to pay for the same games every 5 years? There are literally hundreds of ways to play that old stuff, and most of them are better than Nintendo's offerings.
Stop. It literally does this in Splatoon 2 LAN play. There is no RAM limitation here. (Was the Muzi quote an old leftover?)
This is what no one is talking about. What was the point of the delay? Nothing new was added. NES games known was coming. They needed time to add online? I guess they wanted to time it to launch with Smash. That's the only thing I can think of.Why did they delay this info if we already knew this whole part since the beginning?
I really don't get the fixation with VC. Why are people so eager to pay for the same games every 5 years? There are literally hundreds of ways to play that old stuff, and most of them are better than Nintendo's offerings.
Wow, I think he might be right about this.
Only more information about the cloud saves and the NES games is expected. What we know today is pretty much it for the service launch.20 dollars a year for cloud saves and roms. Sweet... there is more to come right?
No he wasn't right. It was confirmed fake days ago.
Only if you're sharing, only if you play multiplayer games. If they want me to consider a solution to a problem they created a "free perk" they shouldn't be trying to sell it to me.Its 20$ a year, 4.5 family plan, a plan that you are already likely buying to play online. So Cloud Saves becomes a free perk
Nick Robinson. You can tell by where it says Nick Robinson.
lol
Wow, I think he might be right about this.
Edit: Nevermind. I'm seeing people on here saying it's not accurate.
This is something soo obvious at sight that ill be baffled if it turns out they didnt do it on purposeThat family plan is going to get abused to hell lol. That's $5 per person a year if you share. So many sharing circles going to appear.
oh a piece of shit. he should keep his goddamn mouth shut then.https://www./threads/nick-robinson-...ual-harassment-allegations-suspended.1415751/
Do you honestly think a system that has more RAM dedicated to its OS than the 360 had total can't handle party chat?Must have been, sorry.
I don't think LAN mode chat is close to what we all want here.