World of light, a couple of reaaaaaally problematic spirit fights.
World of light, a couple of reaaaaaally problematic spirit fights.
A number of black characters in adventure mode are represented by donkey Kong or diddy Kong. I think it was Sandman from Punchout represented by Donkey Kong and Dee Jay from street fighter as Diddy Kong
Because its resetera? This shit pops up every day with a different topicWhy did the first few pages in this thread immediately jump to conclusions and try to throw Nintendo under a bus and claim they are full conservative without doing a lick of research or reading? Why are we like this? Aren't we supposed to be the rational think-first forum? Or were we always doomed to go down this road of read the headline and shoot-at-the-hip style of posting?
This, fucking this.As many other have stated, this was clearly not the company stance on the issue and it was a mistake... that said, the fact that there has not been rectification of the issue is the real issue here. It, at the very least, sends a muddled messy message on LGBTQ+. Nintendo should unban them, release a statement and apology and make clear their stance.
The fact that there is any room to question Nintendo's motives even a tiny bit is actually a problem that I don't think some people realize. There should be no wiggle room, there should be no room to misinterpret. Yeah sometimes outside moderation fucks up, but then they should immediately jump in when this is recognized and make it right.
As many other have stated, this was clearly not the company stance on the issue and it was a mistake... that said, the fact that there has been rectification of the issue is the real issue here. It, at the very least, sends a muddled messy message on LGBTQ+. Nintendo should unban them, release a statement and apology and make clear their stance.
The fact that there is any room to question Nintendo's motives even a tiny bit is actually a problem that I don't think some people realize. There should be no wiggle room, there should be no room to misinterpret. Yeah sometimes outside moderation fucks up, but then they should immediately jump in when this is recognized and made it right.
Has 24 hrs even passed/ is anybody covering this? I don't think any big company works that fast if this all happened today.As many other have stated, this was clearly not the company stance on the issue and it was a mistake... that said, the fact that there has not been rectification of the issue is the real issue here. It, at the very least, sends a muddled messy message on LGBTQ+. Nintendo should unban them, release a statement and apology and make clear their stance.
The fact that there is any room to question Nintendo's motives even a tiny bit is actually a problem that I don't think some people realize. There should be no wiggle room, there should be no room to misinterpret. Yeah sometimes outside moderation fucks up, but then they should immediately jump in when this is recognized and make it right.
Sadly, no they haven't. I just played Adventure Mode (NG+) recently & still saw the Mr. Sandman spirit battle with DK.Reminds me, did they remove the racist garbage from the game?
They keep digging deeper and deeper with this bullshit.
This only became public a few hours ago (judging by the timestamps in the OP) when Nintendo of Japan/still asleep was waking up and when Nintendo of America was leaving work/at home, and so far the post explaining the situation (which isn't directed at any of Nintendo's official social media accounts) seems to be sitting at a relatively low amount of retweets (the OP didn't link to the tweets so I don't know what the number is). Nintendo may be a massive corporation but no corporation can both notice and then handle something like this that fast.
As for why they didn't immediately jump in: that's almost definitely because very few companies ever have a completely centralised 'customer service' system, especially one where higher-ups can make judgement calls on a case-by-case basis. Nintendo, like most (if not all) companies their size, has customer service divisions wholly seperate to their main offices, that is if they even 'own' those divisions themselves instead of them just being simply contractors.
Has 24 hrs even passed/ is anybody covering this? I don't think any big company works that fast if this all happened today.
I really shouldn't be surprised by Nintendo at this point, but man this makes me feel bad. Trans rights should not be viewed as a political statement, and to claim they deleted it because it is political is bullshit. Automated delete or not, Nintendo allowing this is making a political statement, and shows how little they actually care about the LGBTQ+ community.
I'm not saying they don't have time to make this right, only that it looks awful right now and the fact that the original customer service person couldn't make it right is also an issue.
Again, companies can NOT leave space for any interpretation for hate. If you leave wiggle room for hateful assholes, they will swarm in. It's how the alt-right operates right now. They KNOW they can't be openly racist and they know their idols and people of power can't say what they really mean, so they look for the cracks and holes. They look for the code signs that say they are welcome, even when what's being said doesn't quite match. The current US president knows this better than anyone and makes nods to the people he can't just outright admit to wanting the support of.
If you leave any sort of ambiguity to these assholes not being welcome, they will take it as a sign that they are. That's why it's important to get a statement out as quickly as possible making their stance as clear as possible.
I really shouldn't be surprised by Nintendo at this point, but man this makes me feel bad. Trans rights should not be viewed as a political statement, and to claim they deleted it because it is political is bullshit. Automated delete or not, Nintendo allowing this is making a political statement, and shows how little they actually care about the LGBTQ+ community.
Sorry I didn't mean it that way. I just mean that it shouldn't have been political in the first place, it should have been a thing people accept. But I understand your point and will remember it in the future.It is political. The celebration of trans people is definitely political, it exists as counter to heavily systematized discrimination in society, thus it unavoidably concerns the social coexistence with and fundamental rights of transgender folk. This notion that transgender issues aren't political because the fact can be just simply thought of as that, a fact, really undermines the truth of the context we live in, and the history of transgender activism. The solution to the problem of Nintendo banning this stage because it's political isn't to explain that transgender positive messages aren't political. They are, and should be. The lives, rights, health and safety of transgender people should be a social concern and priority. The solution is that Nintendo should align itself with progressive politics that add positive reinforcement to a counter culture that saves and allows the lives of transgender folk, rather than deny their presence and unavoidably grant a real measure of currency to transphobic fuckheads in doing so.
I think every transgender person knows their lives can be done and undone by the law and the government. Can't get more political than that.
Did they atleast comment on this?Sadly, no they haven't. I just played Adventure Mode (NG+) recently & still saw the Mr. Sandman spirit battle with DK.
Trans fights are absolutely a political statement...that's the whole point. Being pro-trans is a political stance. LGBT people are well aware the majority of the world doesn't like us.
Customer service representatives rarely (if ever) have the power to do things such as rescind the decisions of 'higher ups' (i.e. almost everyone else in the company') unless those decisions were an objective mistake. The rep's inability to change this shouldn't be a knock on Nintendo, especially since the rep itself voiced their displeasure at the decision.
As for the rest, I disagree in that this will 'leave the door open' for the alt-right to invade Nintendo's spaces. It's an incredibly minor incident in the grand scheme of things and there are many signs that Nintendo does allow trans-positive content in their games. However I doubt you're going to change your mind on that stance so I'm gonna leave this here.
Nintendo themselves didn't allow this, a moderator with an all-too-prevalent shitty opinion used the policy of 'No Political Posts' to allow themselves to take down this particular content. This ain't like THQ where you have board members actively pulling awful moves so, unless this escalates (whether that be with mass-removals of trans content or a statement from Nintendo supporting the decision) it's a bit of a misjudgement imo to paint Nintendo in that bad of a light.
The problem is that Nintendo never owns up and makes this stance clear, and they have had troublesome issues in the not-so-distant past on these things (see the Fire Emblem conversion conversation mentioned earlier). It shouldn't be passive "Nintendo allows it." it should be declarative and affirmative. "Nintendo welcomes it" and "Nintendo will not tolerate any negative stances against people of any nation, creed, sexual orientation, etc".As for the rest, I disagree in that this will 'leave the door open' for the alt-right to invade Nintendo's spaces. It's an incredibly minor incident in the grand scheme of things and there are many signs that Nintendo does allow trans-positive content in their games. However I doubt you're going to change your mind on that stance so I'm gonna leave this here.
No lies detected. It's a shame but I'm afraid it is a political statement.Trans rights are absolutely a political statement...that's the whole point. Being pro-trans is a political stance. LGBT people are well aware the majority of the world doesn't like us.
Unfortunately, neither Nintendo nor Sakurai have yet to comment on the racist spirits.Did they atleast comment on this?
I don't understand what the hell they were thinking to do this. If they don't want to represent these characters the right way then don't do it.
I am not sure who the hell approves these things but if it is Sakurai then he needs to understand what he has done and aknowledge it. Same goes to others on the team and Nintendo itself if they keep fucking up. It is truly a disgusting thing.
Nothing to add, you're right on.The problem is that Nintendo never owns up and makes this stance clear, and they have had troublesome issues in the not-so-distant past on these things (see the Fire Emblem conversion conversation mentioned earlier). It shouldn't be passive "Nintendo allows it." it should be declarative and affirmative. "Nintendo welcomes it" and "Nintendo will not tolerate any negative stances against people of any nation, creed, sexual orientation, etc".
Honestly, I'm not sure what you think my mind needs changing on... Passive IS harmful, especially when mistakes like these happen. They may seem small, but to a trans or any LGBTQ+ person it feels big and when a company makes a mistake and doesn't own to it, it feels dismissive. And as I said, they aren't the only ones watching, if it's not corrected and denounced, the alt-right will see it as support. This is how they function as a whole. They know they aren't welcome in 'polite' society so to speak, this is not a controversial statement. This is well known, it's why the alt-right have a ton of little tells like the OK hand gesture, and coded phrases.
You don't leave room for misinterpretation.
Sorry I didn't mean it that way. I just mean that it shouldn't have been political in the first place, it should have been a thing people accept. But I understand your point and will remember it in the future.
I appologize for offending you and others.
Nope.
Consider for a second that someone in the moderation team just made a bad call after a stage has been reported, potentially.
The problem is that Nintendo never owns up and makes this stance clear
Thanks for the info.Sadly, neither Nintendo nor Sakurai have yet to comment on the racist spirits.
No worries. I try to be as progressive as possible so these kinds of posts are welcome.Oh no need to apologize, we're cool. It's just that i've see that point come up again and again and i let it all out in a single go.
Not that I know of. I wouldn't say it's a cultural thing but PlayStation is a California based company and thus very socially conscious. Nintendo's a Japanese based company but you would think their American division is somewhat autonomous.Fucking hell Nintendo. I follow PlayStation on Facebook and they've quite a few times shown support for the LGBT community. Has Nintendo ever publicly supported the movement?
Everything is politics if you think about it. This was a celebration of their identity and their right to exist.Trans rights are absolutely a political statement...that's the whole point. Being pro-trans is a political stance. LGBT people are well aware the majority of the world doesn't like us.
Not that I know of. I wouldn't say it's a cultural thing but PlayStation is a California based company and thus very socially conscious. Nintendo's a Japanese based company but you would think their American division is somewhat autonomous.
http://mynintendonews.com/2018/06/25/nintendo-niantic-took-part-in-seattles-pride-parade/amp/Fucking hell Nintendo. I follow PlayStation on Facebook and they've quite a few times shown support for the LGBT community. Has Nintendo ever publicly supported the movement?
By all means, point to an official statement made by Nintendo on their stance about LGBTQ+. Bonus points if it was already posted in this thread and I missed it.If you look through this thread you will find evidence that proves otherwise.
Sony Interactive Entertainment is a US division of Sony Corporation, a Japanese company. SIE operates from their main HQ which is located in San Mateo, CA.Huh?
Sony is a Japanese company just like Nintendo with a US-based division.
Nintendo tends to be very conservative on social issues and tends to shy away from these subjects.Fucking hell Nintendo. I follow PlayStation on Facebook and they've quite a few times shown support for the LGBT community. Has Nintendo ever publicly supported the movement?
Fucking hell Nintendo. I follow PlayStation on Facebook and they've quite a few times shown support for the LGBT community. Has Nintendo ever publicly supported the movement?
Not that I know of. I wouldn't say it's a cultural thing but PlayStation is a California based company and thus very socially conscious. Nintendo's a Japanese based company but you would think their American division is somewhat autonomous.
Nope.
Consider for a second that someone in the moderation team just made a bad call after a stage has been reported, potentially.
It's good, but not specifically for trans people. I don't want to make this a purity test, but Nintendo has done something concerning the LGBT community. They just aren't terribly upfront about it.
This was one case and I doubt the person who banned this was even from NCL.Seems to me it really is a problem with NCL and how conservative/behind the times they are.
There is nothing any more inherently sexual about a trans person than there is about a cis person.I think what he means is that anything sexual at all ( boy, girl, bi, trans, gender fluid, ect) should be just left out of game service where can kids play. It doesn't mean anything is wrong with it at all, of course its a good cause, its just kids have an innocence that they deserve to have. I'd also argue against any toys having a gender label for the same reason.
It's also possible i'm wrong and would love to hear a respectful rebuttal without being attacked