You are right it is an OP-ED.
I guess the OP-ED made up the facts about her railroading or the fact that she was against body cameras for police? I guess in your world made up facts are facts that do no agree with your point.
As a senator, she cosponsored a bill for the adoption of more body camera for police and ICE.
Reviewing her record as AG is important. But it should not be separated from her positions as a senator. People evolve.
As AG
https://www.sacbee.com/news/politics-government/capitol-alert/article22451643.html
"I as a general matter believe that we should invest in the ability of law enforcement leaders in specific regions and with their departments to use ... discretion to figure out what technology they are going to adopt based on needs that they have and resources that they have," Harris told reporters in Sacramento.
"So, I don't think we can have a one-size-fits-all approach to this," she added.
As Senator
https://www.harris.senate.gov/news/...tablish-body-worn-camera-programs-at-cbp-ice-
"Our government functions best when it is transparent and accountable to its citizens," said Senator Harris. "This is something I prioritized as Attorney General of California and continue to fight for in the United States Senate. Body-worn cameras can not only lower use-of-force incidents, but can also help reduce grievances against officers and ultimately improve trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve."