I mean can't you tell they literally traced over that light field?A light passing over a field is a rip off now?
You might wanna change the thread title.
Yep! A lot of fud being spread.
I'm more than aware of that, Im just saying I can't direct do it myself lol
Well even if it's just certain snippets, this is not only copying the basic concept.
The composition of these shots are near identical.
You shouldn't really be defending stealing other people's work and certainly not by these billion dollar companies.
Yeah, that's the biggest red flag for me. It's one thing to copy the theme, but framing/compositing too?
Big Reach IMO. Wasn't arguing for or against by posting, just sharing the previous "controversy" that was being asked about.I don't get this one... isn't the Xbox ad using an existing speech? And the visuals aren't similar whatsoever.... is he trying to claim an intriguing old speech narration is the idea he came up with???
So the people saying it was a clear ripoff, did you watch both videos entirely or just the edited video in the tweet?
The video in the tweet in the OP is edited to show the shots happening in the same order.Those shots are damn near 1:1. How is that a reach???
EDIT: Folks are editing videos to draw this conclusion? That's pretty suspect.
Here's the link to the entire video OP is mentioning. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXSKhohnmosSo the people saying it was a clear ripoff, did you watch both videos entirely or just the edited video in the tweet?
It doesn't really matter much to me but those segments in the OP are clearly ripping the original artist, I don't know why some people in here are downplaying the differences.
The video in the tweet in the OP is edited to show the shots happening in the same order.
Yep. Fucking disgusting.The video in the tweet in the OP is edited to show the shots happening in the same order.