That's a very harrowing read. Thank you for sharing this.
It really showcases how fighting against invaders isn't just "fighting for a piece of land/flag", too. It's about survival, and protecting your community and loved ones.
You could just as easily say that it's very easy to dismiss conscription as wrong or disgusting when it's not your own country being threatened by an invader.
I don't blame anyone fleeing their country rather than staying and fight. I can't say what I would do if I were in the position where my country were invaded, and I had the means to flee, but could choose to stay and fight. It's a difficult choice with no right answer here. I'd like to think I would stay and fight, as I like Canada and I like living in it and I would not fight for a piece of land but for my friends and family and community. If I lived in the US, or another country that treated me like shit, though? Heh, who knows what I'd do, honestly.
But if Canada were invaded by a foreign power and decided the only way to survive as a nation and a people, was to use conscription? I can't say that I wouldn't get it or that I'd find it inherently "wrong".
Regarding the refugees though: they are refugees and as such, protected from being deported by international law, as I understand it, so Poland is in the wrong here. That's separate from the topic of conscription in general, though.
Exactly. Like this nonsense:
This is the kind of self-righteous, binary thinking that completely ignores the reality of war, particularly from the perspective of the people suffering from hostile invaders. Go tell Finns who still have a Finland today thanks to conscription, or survivors of the nazis, how disgusting they are. That is, if they can even hear you all the way down from your moral high horse.