Oh boy, Metacritic.
You can go read your post that started this: You did not say "in my opinion" you blatantly laughed and dismissed everyone who has issues with the game, while admitting you'd barely played it, and finished with a hot take "AT LEAST ITS BETTE RTHAN THE DIVISION" - Like, your post is there, you can go read it before you claim you said things differently, I did.
And yes, it's a realistic shooter. It is set in a realistic setting, and it uses real guns. HENCE. It is a realistic shooter. Destiny is a fantasy shooter, it uses fantastical weapons in a fantasy sci fi setting. Hence, it is NOT realistic. Pretending you didn't understand that when you read it doesn't help your stance here, it just makes you seem pedantic.
All metacritic with a game like these games means is that Destiny has a flashier campaign, no shit. Everyone says the campaign is fine. I said the campaign was fine, in this very thread. But it's a loot shooter, the campaign is not really a major component of the game, and everything else has MAJOR problems. I'm glad you think people that assigned an arbitrary number to the game a day after it came out are relevant to the discussion though, of either game. The Division now is not The Division as it was 2 years ago, and Destiny 2 now is not Destiny 2 as it was a year ago. The difference? They were VERY similar at launch, and one of them has gotten better while the other has not significantly changed.