yeah… I get it…I've got my issues with some mod choices but, like, c'mon, this is silly. What do you think is more likely, that he was involved behind the scenes and talked with the staff even if he wasn't active on the forums, or that he somehow coerced multiple former and current staffers into lying about his involvement?
Like, come on, the mods aren't this monolith, they're a bunch of people that make mistakes or decisions I might not agree with.
So you literally have no idea about my interests.
I do think is extremely hilarious that they managed to sell a graveyard at such a premium price
I do think is extremely hilarious that they managed to sell a graveyard at such a premium price
Nope.
Staff are replaceable, typical of any thing owned by an organization. If new owners want to enforce a new set of rules/policies they will get their way.I'm positive you'd see heavy pushback from staff if they were going to try to change policy.
Off topic but I've always being curious. Are you the same Kamek from Vandal foros?
I literally cannot think of a single instance where we sat down and said "ok, and how does this make us more profitable?" Like, maybe at the beginning where we talked about ads for keeping the lights on, but nothing since then.
I sure are hell am not planning on including that bit of concern in any decision going forward.
Staff are replaceable, typical of any thing owned by an organization. If new owners want to enforce a new set of rules/policies they will get their way.
There's another gaming forum I'm a part of (dayonepatch) that split off from IGN around 2010 (first called badcartridge, then dayonepatch), causing them to lose much of their forum base. The owner is someone who also posts here (in this thread, even), and owns the site 100%. However, he also sinks his own money into it, and I wouldn't begrudge him for ever selling, since he does the work and pays for it (and I'm sure he's losing money for a community he loves).
But I thought the user base hate the mods. Surely they'd throw a party instead?
There's quite literally no feasible way to pay all of the moderators of this site. The "Active Staff Roster" thread says there are 32 moderators. If you were to pay all the moderators something like a minimum wage of $10 an hour at 20 hours a week that'd be over 300k. That also ignores the fact that there is surely a lot of legal work that would be required in administrating these services and also depending on where people are located they'd need to be paid more.I've always been of the mind that if a company is profit-generating (for a private purpose, such as this) then all positions that put in any work should be paid (according to the local laws where the site is hosted). We wouldn't expect people to distribute Pepsi to stores for free simply because they love the company, nor should we expect people to moderate things online for free, simply because they like the community. If someone is making money off something, then anyone contributing labour to that profit needs to be paid.
Where's Zlatan and Abba?Top 3 Best Things About Sweden:
1. The Northern Lights
2. Roxette
3. Ikera
Yes. And also there was no need to essentially con people with Era Clear passes to "keep the site going".
You have 45 posts. You are acting like you've been a big cornerstone of the community unless you are using an alt to talk smack behind?This is cracking me up. Didn't even know it existed.
"As an Era Clear subscriber you can retain the cleanest possible browsing experience while taking pride in giving something back."
This site was clearly making plenty of money from ad revenue alone to cover server costs and then some. So why did Era Clear need to exist other than to line the owner's pockets? Why not just say so instead of floating across some platitude laden bullshit? I'm fine with being a member of a site that's owned by some dude, I've been an SomethingAwful member forever, but at least they are fairly transparent about it. This vague community-centric wording is shady as fuck and exploitative considering the circumstances in which this forum was created.
If you think there's a glut of people who are willing to mod Era, much less to the quality that Hecht does, good on you for being optimistic.
And the site was generating 700k/year, it seems. So, if you payed the mods, you still got 400k to spend, by your calculationsThere's quite literally no feasible way to pay all of the moderators of this site. The "Active Staff Roster" thread says there are 32 moderators. If you were to pay all the moderators something like a minimum wage of $10 an hour at 20 hours a week that'd be over 300k. That also ignores the fact that there is surely a lot of legal work that would be required in administrating these services and also depending on where people are located they'd need to be paid more.
There's quite literally no feasible way to pay all of the moderators of this site. The "Active Staff Roster" thread says there are 32 moderators. If you were to pay all the moderators something like a minimum wage of $10 an hour at 20 hours a week that'd be over 300k. That also ignores the fact that there is surely a lot of legal work that would be required in administrating these services and also depending on where people are located they'd need to be paid more.
Doesn't he have a point though? Why did era clear even have to be a thing.You have 45 posts. You are acting like you've been a big cornerstone of the community unless you are using an alt to talk smack behind?
I also read a lot of the GDPR as I had to deal with implementation for a number of clients across their services and, from memory, I'm pretty sure that anonymising data grants exemption for the most part. Deleted users have their usernames scrubbed so I'm sure that would provide them a lot of scope too.
He's talking about me, by the way! :oP
And OF COURSE I'm losing money - we have absolutely no revenue stream on dayonepatch.com (the #1 site on the internet) whatsoever! It's the only purely Marxist-Leninist-Maoist gaming site on the internet!
You have 45 posts. You are acting like you've been a big cornerstone of the community unless you are using an alt to talk smack behind?
There is zero way anyone can guarantee that, unless it was officially stated in the contract.
And the site was generating 700k/year, it seems. So, if you payed the mods, you still got 400k to spend, by your calculations
This whole thing keeps getting grosser by the minute as more stuff gets pointed out.This is cracking me up. Didn't even know it existed.
"As an Era Clear subscriber you can retain the cleanest possible browsing experience while taking pride in giving something back."
This site was clearly making plenty of money from ad revenue alone to cover server costs and then some. So why did Era Clear need to exist other than to line the owner's pockets? Why not just say so instead of floating across some platitude laden bullshit? I'm fine with being a member of a site that's owned by some dude, I've been an SomethingAwful member forever, but at least they are fairly transparent about it. This vague community-centric wording is shady as fuck and exploitative considering the circumstances in which this forum was created.
For the accusations of sidestepping you sure do a lot of it yourself lmao. Are you really so dense you don't understand that ringing the bell of mods being paid rings hollow based on the communities past actions? Because you sure are sidestepping that behavior and are trying to frame it as some kind of valid and constructive criticism. Then trying to put on a holier than thou mantle of "all labor should be paid"Again, a lot of dancing around without saying a lot. You seem to agree that people should be paid for labor and that it would be a benefit the site as a well for modship to be paid and trained. So, what is your argument? Is it solely about calling out fraud? Or is it that you can't be critical and believe that at the same time. Like what is your counterpoint here? If it's just that you feel you're better than people who were critical to mods in the past, you know, good for you, I guess. But like I said before, and like you sidestepped, it's irrelevant to the overall point. You can be better than "ya'll." I honestly don't think anyone cares
And I don't know what this weird attempt is at trying to throw my work back at me is. The fact that I am work in retail makes me understand why work should be rewarded and people should be paid more (or, in this case, at all). What that has to do with anything is beyond me. I believe you can still be critical of retail workers and still believe, in general, retail workers should be paid more. So what difference does this make to anything being said.
That's kind of sad that each community is splintering off like this. They're going to be weaker being separate, fewer new users coming in, etc.I will delete if its against TOS.
installbaseforum for Japan Sales/Sales
Xboxera for Xbox
famiboards for Nintendo
Not sure about others but i will only join a few and lurks in the others lol.
Sony is still on ERA lol
MOBA, helpI never thought I'd see the day when Sony sells their online community.
You have 45 posts. You are acting like you've been a big cornerstone of the community unless you are using an alt to talk smack behind?
This is cracking me up. Didn't even know it existed.
"As an Era Clear subscriber you can retain the cleanest possible browsing experience while taking pride in giving something back."
This site was clearly making plenty of money from ad revenue alone to cover server costs and then some. So why did Era Clear need to exist other than to line the owner's pockets? Why not just say so instead of floating across some platitude laden bullshit? I'm fine with being a member of a site that's owned by some dude, I've been an SomethingAwful member forever, but at least they are fairly transparent about it. This vague community-centric wording is shady as fuck and exploitative considering the circumstances in which this forum was created.
lol I don't think they care about being "weaker"That's kind of sad that each community is splintering off like this. They're going to be weaker being separate, fewer new users coming in, etc.
you saying they aren't prominent enough?You have 45 posts. You are acting like you've been a big cornerstone of the community unless you are using an alt to talk smack behind?
You have 1,137 and yet they added more thought to their post. You'd think you'd learn after a while and not be elitist about post counts
yep it's pretty grossThis is cracking me up. Didn't even know it existed.
"As an Era Clear subscriber you can retain the cleanest possible browsing experience while taking pride in giving something back."
This site was clearly making plenty of money from ad revenue alone to cover server costs and then some. So why did Era Clear need to exist other than to line the owner's pockets? Why not just say so instead of floating across some platitude laden bullshit? I'm fine with being a member of a site that's owned by some dude, I've been an SomethingAwful member forever, but at least they are fairly transparent about it. This vague community-centric wording is shady as fuck and exploitative considering the circumstances in which this forum was created.
Well that is assuming that the site always makes 700k/year and not that it is the top end for all we know. Additionally, it ignores any operating costs and also the fact that admins would have to be paid if mods were and then again you'd have to pay lawyers and accountants to handle payroll.And the site was generating 700k/year, it seems. So, if you payed the mods, you still got 400k to spend, by your calculations
I mean, he's right but plenty of other forums have the exact same "Pay to remove ads" structure. It was a fools errand for anyone to believe this site was some small website struggling to pull in cash, especially when this topic has come up in the past.Doesn't he have a point though? Why did era clear even have to be a thing.
Again, people were fooling themselves if they didn't think the site was making money. I haven't read anything to ever suggest Era was struggling and there was good precedent from GAF to support the idea that forums make good money with an active userbase (Of which Era has a significant userbase).What part of what they're saying is incorrect, though?
Era Clear -- and the prevailing outward notion that these things were "keeping the lights on" -- is, in retrospect, incredibly deceptive.
Not least which because we've had some staff in here saying they were fully aware of the site's financial situation, despite others claiming otherwise.
I'd genuinely be interested in one of them expounding on Era Clear in particular. It is abundantly evident that it was and is unnecessary for its stated purpose, and instead simply functioned to lull people into monetarily supporting an entity that was already making profit hand-over-fist, taking advantage of their good will.
How many posts makes someone a community cornerstone anyway
is it 150
There's quite literally no feasible way to pay all of the moderators of this site. The "Active Staff Roster" thread says there are 32 moderators. If you were to pay all the moderators something like a minimum wage of $10 an hour at 20 hours a week that'd be over 300k. That also ignores the fact that there is surely a lot of legal work that would be required in administrating these services and also depending on where people are located they'd need to be paid more.
It is literally less than 50 posts. If they're a main account then they barely ever used this site and are coming in here to join the angry crowd and stirr shit. If they are an alt account same purpose but they couldn't be assed to speak their thoughts on their main account.You have 1,137 and yet they added more thought to their post. You'd think you'd learn after a while and not be elitist about post counts.