Exactly. Even Peacock, with its dumb name, makes significantly more sense to me as a brand than Apple+ does.
It sounds to me, like Tim Cook is still trying to apply his past experience with manufacturing and supply stuff with television which like...lmao that's not at all how creatives work at all. They're completely different fields and require different levels of management.
Well, they all have a huge back catalogue of tv-series and movies. Apple only has originals, if they are shit, you are left with nothing and the content are barren from the start. $5 a month is cheap, but you also get very, very few content. I guess it's harder and harder to buy existing tv-series, since everyone are launching their own streaming services.
I'm just saying, you have name brands with marvel or Star Wars or looney tunes, you get nothing when you start from nothing
I love how the biggest show they are promoting is so far the biggest negatively reviewed one.
This shit won't last 5 years.
I love how the biggest show they are promoting is so far the biggest negatively reviewed one.
This shit won't last 5 years.
They did try. They actually offered JJ more money than Warners, but he went with Warners anyways because of all the baggage Apple has.
When the bar is so low for Apple superfans, you know Apple has a problem.Rated higher than Game of Thrones Last Season
They're not licensing anything and don't seem to plan to. Plus, I don't think there's going to be much available as companies start holding on to their content for their own usage. It's going to be a lot more difficult to license content moving forward for the time being as companies want existing contracts to expire and not create new ones. So Apple is in a position where they don't have much to offer, the stuff they are offering isn't looking good, and they can't rely on old content even licensed from elsewhere. It's probably a good thing they're giving it away for free otherwise this launch would be abysmal.
