My point is that it is tranphobic to exclude in the broader categories. Like I said, if a person don't want to see black women in the default category we say "fuck you" because black women are women and to exclude them is racist.
It is just they don't click in the women who does not seem attractive to them
Showing videos featuring trans performers in search results to people who don't want to see them is just making search functionality worse.My point is that it is tranphobic to exclude in the broader categories. Like I said, if a person don't want to see black women in the default category we say "fuck you" because black women are women and to exclude them is racist.
It is just they don't click in the women who does not seem attractive to them
Like I said you don't need to get rid of the trans category. But not including us in the other categories, at least for me, is yet another thing that makes me feel that I don't count as a "real" woman. If somebody doesn't want to encounter trans people in their porn, that's fine, but on the other side of the coin these things can be very important to trans people. So who's needs should take priority? The people who can easily click back and find a video that does suit their needs, or the people who would be dehumanized by the status quo.
Another solution would be making specific "cis" categories, and I think I would be okay with that too. But when it's just men and women and then trans men and trans women, it feels like the latter groups are being singled out as not real men and women. That's total bullshit.
And for people discussing ease of navigation of porn sites, I acknowledge that this is a concern for both the sites themselves and users. But this matter is also very important for trans people specifically. Please don't automatically discount the opinions of that latter group.
Trying to equate black people with trans people misses the point entirely. We're talking about pornography, where gender and orientation is of a lot more importance to viewers than race.My point is that it is tranphobic to exclude in the broader categories. Like I said, if a person don't want to see black women in the default category we say "fuck you" because black women are women and to exclude them is racist.
I don't think it's correct to equate skin color and genitalia.
If someone was going to a strip club and had no prior knowledge of the club, do you think they would have the same reaction seeing a woman with a different skin tone dancing as seeing a trans person who identifies as woman but still has a penis dancing?
At some point we have to realize you can have a sexual preference and not be some sort of phobic.
Showing videos featuring trans performers in search results to people who don't want to see them is just making search functionality worse.
I think giving more granular control over search would be a good thing, but any sites deliberately showing videos featuring trans performers to users that don't want to see them would likely just find their users going to other sites with more robust search functionality.
Trying to equate black people with trans people misses the point entirely. We're talking about pornography, where gender and orientation is of a lot more importance to viewers than race.
Categories are already segregated to cater to a mostly hetero audience, and anything beyond that is an opt-in. "Blowjobs" largely yields only hetero blowjobs. "Redheads" does not yield male redheads (gay or straight). "Threesomes" returns MMF, MFF, or FFF.
At the end of the day we're nothing more than a fetish category to some people. Mature, incest, anal... -> transgenderLike I said you don't need to get rid of the trans category. But not including us in the other categories, at least for me, is yet another thing that makes me feel that I don't count as a "real" woman. If somebody doesn't want to encounter trans people in their porn, that's fine, but on the other side of the coin these things can be very important to trans people. So who's needs should take priority? The people who can easily click back and find a video that does suit their needs, or the people who would be dehumanized by the status quo.
Another solution would be making specific "cis" categories, and I think I would be okay with that too. But when it's just men and women and then trans men and trans women, it feels like the latter groups are being singled out as not real men and women. That's total bullshit.
And for people discussing ease of navigation of porn sites, I acknowledge that this is a concern for both the sites themselves and users. But this matter is also very important for trans people specifically. Please don't automatically discount the opinions of that latter group.
Not exactly sure which "you people" you are referring to there. Feel free to quote my prior posts that you're referring to.But it is just the person's preference !
In the dating trans people threads you people said it is just like not being attracted to redheads or someone who has joe dirty on dvd.... So if you are showing every hair color and every joe dirty preference on the category, why not show all woman ?
We can't control our preferences so you are going to exclude EVERY preference ?
I frequent a private porn torrent site. The whole search and indexing system is based on tags. So an upload with for instance trans actress Natalie Mars getting fucked by her cis uncle gets the tags: Natalie.Mars Incest Trans Random.Dude Brunette Small.Tits Facial Gape and a few more. So when I search for facial, my results will consist of gay, straight, trans facials. Only if I decide I don't want to see a scene ending in a straight facial, I can specify this. Or I just skip the stuff I don't want. In the end, this system doesn't exclude any content.Like I said you don't need to get rid of the trans category. But not including us in the other categories, at least for me, is yet another thing that makes me feel that I don't count as a "real" woman. If somebody doesn't want to encounter trans people in their porn, that's fine, but on the other side of the coin these things can be very important to trans people. So who's needs should take priority? The people who can easily click back and find a video that does suit their needs, or the people who would be dehumanized by the status quo.
Another solution would be making specific "cis" categories, and I think I would be okay with that too. But when it's just men and women and then trans men and trans women, it feels like the latter groups are being singled out as not real men and women. That's total bullshit.
And for people discussing ease of navigation of porn sites, I acknowledge that this is a concern for both the sites themselves and users. But this matter is also very important for trans people specifically. Please don't automatically discount the opinions of that latter group.
At the end of the day we're nothing more than a fetish category to some people. Mature, incest, anal, lesbian... -> transgender
All while a split like straight/gay/trans implies trans is a sexual orientation and a cis man with a trans woman is not a straight couple.
Not exactly sure which "you people" you are referring to there. Feel free to quote my prior posts that you're referring to.
I don't think there's anything contradictory with an individual wanting trans-people to have rights, legal protections, be accepted by wider society, free to present gender on their own terms, live free from persecution etc, whilst also not being attracted to them. I also think no one, trans or cis, has any right to be found attractive by any individuals or groups. People can't control their sexual orientations or preferences, but they can control how they treat people inside or outside of their orientations/preferences.
What I have a problem is that by taking trans people away you should also take EVERY other preference away.
Your argument is for the "lesbians" (and by that substitute to any X broad cateogory) to go away. "Cis blond white skinned lesbians" should be the category.
People say this all the time but I just don't see it. I mean, I get the argument, but I feel if there's any humiliation involved,the order isCuckolding porn is dehumanizing to black men due to the nature of it but at the end of the day it's their fantasy. You can't control what other people want to sexually fantasize about as long as it's legal.
It's not OK to pirate porn. Natalie Mars has to eat food too. She's not fucking on camera just to get you off for free.I frequent a private porn torrent site called Empornium. The whole search and indexing system is based on tags. So an upload with for instance trans actress Natalie Mars getting fucked by her cis uncle gets the tags: Natalie.Mars Incest Trans Random.Dude Brunette Small.Tits Facial Gape and a few more. So when I search for facial, my results will consist of gay, straight, trans facials. Only if I decide I don't want to see a scene ending in a straight facial, I can specify this. Or I just skip the stuff I don't want. In the end, this system doesn't exclude any content.
It is however dependent on uploaders that tag their files well. The advantage is that other users can add and vote up individual tags, resulting in better search results. More sites should use this system imo.
Making categories that are overly broad just defeats the purpose of categories for users. Should the "Black / Ebony" category include any video where any participant is black (gay, hetero, cis or trans)? Maybe if you want to be hardline about it, but then that kinda ruins the whole category because it's so unfocused and nonspecific.IF the category is lesbians than it should have every sex act with just 2 women. PERIOD.
Think about it this way. Why is it so humiliating that the white mans white wife is having sex with a black man specifically?People say this all the time but I just don't see it. I mean, I get the argument, but I feel if there's any humiliation involved,the order is
1. White man
2. White woman
3. Black man.
I think you're misunderstanding the power dynamics at play here. The fantasy literally depends on white men viewing black men specifically as stealing away their wives.People say this all the time but I just don't see it. I mean, I get the argument, but I feel if there's any humiliation involved,the order is
1. White man
2. White woman
3. Black man.
Right now you're literally posting on a site where a significant portion of members are complaining about design inefficiencies. Filters not filtering would be a larger cause for outrage. Porn searches should be more granular, not less.The idea that people will stop using porn sites because they might see trans content is hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Right now you're literally posting on a site where a significant portion of members are complaining about design inefficiencies. Filters not filtering would be a larger cause for outrage.
People say this all the time but I just don't see it. I mean, I get the argument, but I feel if there's any humiliation involved,the order is
1. White man
2. White woman
3. Black man.
Eh, to me it's a completely different category, not simply a part of the variety for the vast majority of people.
I'm not even sure what you mean by "you should also take EVERY other preference away"... and you'd be left with what exactly?
I frequent a private porn torrent site called Empornium. The whole search and indexing system is based on tags. So an upload with for instance trans actress Natalie Mars getting fucked by her cis uncle gets the tags: Natalie.Mars Incest Trans Random.Dude Brunette Small.Tits Facial Gape and a few more. So when I search for facial, my results will consist of gay, straight, trans facials. Only if I decide I don't want to see a scene ending in a straight facial, I can specify this. Or I just skip the stuff I don't want. In the end, this system doesn't exclude any content.
It is however dependent on uploaders that tag their files well. The advantage is that other users can add and vote up individual tags, resulting in better search results. More sites should use this system imo.
I mean that it is a preference and should be kept with other preferences like skin color, hair color and bust size. If you take one preference away you should take it all.
If you are not going to categorize "cis black brunnete titjob" than you should have trans women appear on the titjob category
The content in question is made to specifically highlight the physical characteristics of trans people. Thus, the category is legitimate.
I don't think you're going to find anyone that isn't specifically looking for trans women agreeing with you.
Do you care to explain why this preference should not be treated as any other preference?
I will say, in the porn sense, I believe the trans(which is sadly often called shemale) category is pretty much exclusively applied to trans females with male genitalia. That is the primary physical characteristic of this category.Uh, not all trans people are alike physically
You should be ashamed of your ignorance
Cuckolding exist because of the sexual view that black men are violent sexual beast to be used to violate white women/wives. Otherwise they would just get white guys to do it but I never see that type of porn. That's also why interracial porn is so popular among white men.
You can already. Especially with paid sites like Evil Angel. When you make your account you can choose to have Trans show up in your feed of new releases or not. Same with Reality Kings. I think free sites like Xvideos and Pornhub lets you do it as well.Feels like better search/browsing would be the solution.
Let people decide between "want to browse/search for exclusively trans models", "want to browse/search for exclusively cis models" and "want to browse/search both trans/cis models". Seems to me that would work for everyone.
We gotta be careful here. That particular brand of cuckolding has a ton of racist baggage, yeah. Let's not stigmatize cuckolding in general, though.
Not sure why you deigned to explain it to me after I specifically said I understand the connotations involved.Cuckolding exist because of the sexual view that black men are violent sexual beast to be used to violate white women/wives. Otherwise they would just get white guys to do it but I never see that type of porn. That's also why interracial porn is so popular among white men.
Aside from the fact that they're married and the Black man is considered a superior lover?Think about it this way. Why is it so humiliating that the white mans white wife is having sex with a black man specifically?
I'm not misunderstanding a thing. What I'm saying is that the racism inherent in that particular type of porn is much less overtly humiliating to the black male as it is to the white male. In fact, I feel the most damaging stereotype to black makes in that type of fetish porn is the assumption that all black males are endlessly virile sex machines, and even that is ultimately more demeaning to the white male.I think you're misunderstanding the power dynamics at play here. The fantasy literally depends on white men viewing black men specifically as stealing away their wives.
this belief that it is okay to pirate music and porn is so bizarreIt's not OK to pirate porn. Natalie Mars has to eat food too. She's not fucking on camera just to get you off for free.
It's not OK to pirate porn. Natalie Mars has to eat food too. She's not fucking on camera just to get you off for free.