My bad. It was a long night. Had 2 papers due and well my brain wasn't at all focused when I was typing.There's a reason that the word "or" exists and why I used it in that particular sentence.
My bad. It was a long night. Had 2 papers due and well my brain wasn't at all focused when I was typing.There's a reason that the word "or" exists and why I used it in that particular sentence.
I keep checking-in on this thread, but with no fix at this point, my hope for one is waning.
....how long are you suggesting? It honestly doesn't take that long. And a bundle doesn't have to be finished to be a response. You could sign a deal and present an announcement mock-up in days... hell it all could be done in a day.It takes months for a SKU to come to the market, so that wasn't a response. Just weird timing.
....how long are you suggesting? It honestly doesn't take that long. And a bundle doesn't have to be finished to be a response. You could sign a deal and present an announcement mock-up in days... hell it all could be done in a day.
That was my guess as to what was happening, the bundle being somewhat of a defense(?, don't know if that is the right word) to what's going on. If I'm not mistaken the bundle has a super rare skin doesn't it? That has to be an effect of what's going on.
Edit: the timing of the announcement was no fluke.
This won't hurt anything at all.
Unless someone can show otherwise my belief has always been that majority of sales for consoles come from parents buying for their kids. No parent is going to sell a PS4 and buy a XBox because they also have a Switch lying around and their kid wants to jump between 2 or even 3 different consoles for one game.
Who knows, maybe i'm wrong, but i'm also still waiting for all that hurt PS4 was going to feel when they didn't get Minecraft: Better Together.
I don't know if a parent would make that choice but a kid would definitely tell his parents if he knew that by getting the ps4 version would not be able to play with his friends on a different version. That might not move the needle much but it still matters.
It will be felt at the start of next gen.This won't hurt anything at all.
Unless someone can show otherwise my belief has always been that majority of sales for consoles come from parents buying for their kids. No parent is going to sell a PS4 and buy a XBox because they also have a Switch lying around and their kid wants to jump between 2 or even 3 different consoles for one game.
Who knows, maybe i'm wrong, but i'm also still waiting for all that hurt PS4 was going to feel when they didn't get Minecraft: Better Together.
Sony holding friends hostage too? When will the madness stop.Also works the other way though. If they leave the PS4 then they'll be locked out from their friends who play on PS4.
Sony holding friends hostage too? When will the madness stop.
Reality is, Xbox and switch is affordable, their friends can dip too
What you said sounds right, but I still would give this weeks, 2 months tops. Deciding if they wanted to do a bundle probably took longer. But, ok. My point was this was not a 8 month long decision that was coming into fruition in the midst of a shitstorm.As someone who works in a similar, physical product driven industry (not the gaming industry, the music industry) and has to sign of products and new SKUs regularly - I would guess at weeks or months. To get the artwork done and signed off, to get the deals signed off, to get the press releases written and approved, to get the new boxes printed. I doubt the Fortnite console was a reaction to this situation. I bet it's been in the works for a long time.
Maybe Sony are super efficient and can knock these things out super fast (if the music industry is anything, it's not time efficient...) and I'm talking bollocks. But, at a guess, I'd say signing off any part of this takes more time than most would imagine.
What you said sounds right, but I still would give this weeks, 2 months tops. Deciding if they wanted to do a bundle probably took longer. But, ok. My point was this was not a 8 month long decision that was coming into fruition in the midst of a shitstorm.
.....not caring for cross play is a mark of die hard fanatiscm? Sheesh....I think there's s lot of hyperbole on both sides. "We will never see positive advances"? Really never? Because of this one issue?I can't believe what I'm reading in this thread now. We will never see positive advancements in this industry with such die hard fans.
Yeah if Sony isn't on point with their reveal. I have no doubts they will use this negative PR as part of a "mic drop" type of positive PR kickoff moment at their PS5 reveal.
I don't know, I always had both consoles, all my Sega consoles were purchased used from funco land after doing chores and mowing neighbors lawns. Parents purchased the Nintendo.Guess times are different. If I asked my parents for another console they'd tell me I already have one and to just play that. Most of my friends were in the same boat lol.
Also works the other way though. If they leave the PS4 then they'll be locked out from their friends who play on PS4.
I know for my nephews, a lot more of them have iPads. They can jump in and out of my Minecraft games on their tablets when they are out and about and if they are home, one can be on xbox while their siblings and friends are on iPad.
I don't know, I always had both consoles, all my Sega consoles were purchased used from funco land after doing chores and mowing neighbors lawns. Parents purchased the Nintendo.
I see what you tried to do....but seeing how apple drops exclusives app and music deals all the time this is comes off as a very disingenuous joke.Apple sells more iPads than Microsoft does Surface, why is Apple allowing this to happen!!!
Isn't it worth it to wait for the next battlepass? That's what I'm doing to start off my Switch account.
Gonna be painful to leave my old account since I have the skull trooper skin. fcking sony man
I see what you tried to do....but seeing how apple drops exclusives app and music deals all the time this is comes off as a very disingenuous joke.
I think he's talking about the mainstream, Black Friday parent shoppers, when they do the most shopping. Me being a parent to a child who plays Fortnite in this situation is what lead me to this thread. Since we have everything, 2 PS4's, 2 Switch's, 1 OneS, it's hard for me to say. But I can't see myself selling a PS4 to buy a Switch or vice versa.There are parents on ERA who said they were going to do exactly that. This will have an effect.
Though I agree with you that I doubt the effect will be very significant at all.
LmaoIf it took 8 months they would've had to have been planning it the week Fortnite BR launched!
I thought recently Yoshida said he was trying to get FFXIV on switch and Xbox but all parties needed to want to play with each other or something along those lines which was basically pointing at Sony again.
No. The issue on MS's side once they were ok with cross play has always been that MS requires that the player have the option to opt out of cross play. Yoshida is adamant that anyone playing FF14 has to be on shared servers. This is why FF14 isn't on Xbox at all instead of just being on a separate server.The issue is probably requiring Gold, 1 of their requirements is no additional subscription required (PS+/Gold), just the monthly sub for the game, so crossplay won't be the roadblock yet, though I'm sure Sony will say no if they ever get asked. A big giveaway is MS' silence on the matter, if Sony were the problem they'd say and so would Yoshida most likely (he doesn't seem the type to just accept that), not just say talks with MS are ongoing everytime.
I think the casual gamer would be happy to know they can play with friends on opposing consoles if they knew it was possible. Would save the consumer money. Here people seem to be actively against it because party lines, have no friends who game or because it doesn't effect their single player game lifestyle so they "don't give a fuck".You also forget that we're on an enthusiast forum so attitudes here will likely be different towards gaming than the average person. Plenty of people (I'd guess the vast majority) are happy with their 1 console and the friends they play with on there.
Yeah, ironically I think the more casual audience would be more confused about why they can't just play with their friends on other platforms. Hardcore players are more understanding (even if they might not like it) because they know it's been the status quo since forever.I think the casual gamer would be happy to know they can play with friends on opposing consoles if they knew it was possible. Would save the consumer money. Here people seem to be actively against it because party lines, have no friends who game or because it doesn't effect their single player game lifestyle so they "don't give a fuck".
End of the day, Sony's stance on this for the biggest game of the generation is not a good look and they will probably continue to take similiar stances over the next two years. It's only going to start adding up.
They don't have opt-out options in some games that are cross-play already, so I doubt the opt-out option is the big issue, whereas they require Gold for every game, no matter what, so it's more likely caused by that, as no PS+ is also a requirement they asked Sony to agree to. Either way I don't think it's due to cross-play or Sony at this point, probably will if MS and Square ever make an agreement though.No. The issue on MS's side once they were ok with cross play has always been that MS requires that the player have the option to opt out of cross play. Yoshida is adamant that anyone playing FF14 has to be on shared servers. This is why FF14 isn't on Xbox at all instead of just being on a separate server.
They don't have opt-out options in some games that are cross-play already, so I doubt the opt-out option is the big issue, whereas they require Gold for every game, no matter what, so it's more likely caused by that, as no PS+ is also a requirement they asked Sony to agree to. Either way I don't think it's due to cross-play or Sony at this point, probably will if MS and Square ever make an agreement though.
Quick question, as I wouldn't know and don't care to research, Microsoft introduced play anywhere this gen correct. Do they charge for gold on that platform? If not is it really that implausible that Xbox will bait Sony into crossplay next gen then announce free Xbox live? You really think it wouldn't be a marketing plus? Aren't they putting first games on game pass at a loss essentially. Do you really think they cannot afford it?Gold price has only raised over time. If MS thought making Gold free or reduced was a game winning plan, they would have already done it.
Quick question, as I wouldn't know and don't care to research, Microsoft introduced play anywhere this gen correct. Do they charge for gold on that platform? If not is it really that implausible that Xbox will bait Sony into crossplay next gen then announce free Xbox live? You really think it wouldn't be a marketing plus? Aren't they putting first games on game pass at a loss essentially. Do you really think they cannot afford it?
Y'all boys reaching now....ima buy a $200+ console because i cant transfer a couple digital items? You bugginIt will be felt at the start of next gen.
Sony holding friends hostage too? When will the madness stop.
Reality is, Xbox and switch is affordable, their friends can dip too
Well if it will have an effect then change will come. If it doesn't then I guess this thread and other outlets are really just a very very vocal minorityThere are parents on ERA who said they were going to do exactly that. This will have an effect.
Though I agree with you that I doubt the effect will be very significant at all.
I was referring to next gen all they need to do is make cross play commonplace this gen.Of course it would be a marketing plus, but compared to how much they'd lose from dumping the paywall it's so not worth it.
Making Xbox Live free won't suddenly move 10's of millions more consoles to magically cover the loss.
It would be great for consumers if it came to pass but it just won't.
Couple digital items add up quick in real world currency. Right now Sony is not looking future proof due to their policies. If Fortnite is still a thing in 2020, if it evolves from what it is today and still a thing next gen. Let's say Nintendo, Xbox releases their system before Sony. You pick up a Xbox and guess what, you have to start from scratch. That may not bother you, but as someone who had to start from scratch on Xbox because of this policy, it sucks and I refuse to invest anymore money on third party titles in the Sony ecosystem if this trend continues.Y'all boys reaching now....ima buy a $200+ console because i cant transfer a couple digital items? You buggin
A vocal minority on era, a site that leans single player/Sony enthusiast is not a good gauge of the over all market.Well if it will have an effect then change will come. If it doesn't then I guess this thread and other outlets are really just a very very vocal minority
Minuscule in the long term. The bigger issue being that Fortnite is behind a paywall for PlayStation's direct competitor.There are parents on ERA who said they were going to do exactly that. This will have an effect.
Though I agree with you that I doubt the effect will be very significant at all.
I was referring to next gen all they need to do is make cross play commonplace this gen.
They don't have opt-out options in some games that are cross-play already, so I doubt the opt-out option is the big issue, whereas they require Gold for every game, no matter what, so it's more likely caused by that, as no PS+ is also a requirement they asked Sony to agree to. Either way I don't think it's due to cross-play or Sony at this point, probably will if MS and Square ever make an agreement though.
Oh I'm talking bout the #blanesony folks tooCouple digital items add up quick in real world currency. Right now Sony is not looking future proof due to their policies. If Fortnite is still a thing in 2020, if it evolves from what it is today and still a thing next gen. Let's say Nintendo, Xbox releases their system before Sony. You pick up a Xbox and guess what, you have to start from scratch. That may not bother you, but as someone who had to start from scratch on Xbox because of this policy, it sucks and I refuse to invest anymore money on third party titles in the Sony ecosystem if this trend continues.
A vocal minority on era, a site that leans single player/Sony enthusiast is not a good gauge of the over all market.
Games like Evolve may not have died as quickly as it did f ithere was crossplay.It's never going to happen, Xbox fans can talk about how much of a marketing win it would be all day but it's too much money to dump for far, far, far too little in return.
I'll gladly eat crow if they do make Xbox Live free but I can't see it happening.
Even if they did Sony would keep the paywall for PSN though, lol, that I am sure of. They'll cave eventually but they will hang in there for as long as possible.
Bundling it with game pass...eliminate games with gold...sounds very viable to me if they get crossplay down patIt's never going to happen, Xbox fans can talk about how much of a marketing win it would be all day but it's too much money to dump for far, far, far too little in return.
I'll gladly eat crow if they do make Xbox Live free but I can't see it happening.
Even if they did Sony would keep the paywall for PSN though, lol, that I am sure of. They'll cave eventually but they will hang in there for as long as possible.
Cross-play was never going to save Evolve. There was far too many core issues with the game.Games like Evolve may not have died as quickly as it did f ithere was crossplay.
This is something devs should be pushing for to keep their communities afloat and keep the GaaS money flowing in.
Games like Evolve may not have died as quickly as it did if there was crossplay.
This is something devs should be pushing for to keep their communities afloat and keep the GaaS money flowing in.
Bundling it with game pass...eliminate games with gold...sounds very viable to me if they get crossplay down pat
Quick question, as I wouldn't know and don't care to research, Microsoft introduced play anywhere this gen correct. Do they charge for gold on that platform? If not is it really that implausible that Xbox will bait Sony into crossplay next gen then announce free Xbox live? You really think it wouldn't be a marketing plus? Aren't they putting first games on game pass at a loss essentially. Do you really think they cannot afford it?
Yeah, no one wanted to play the monster, who didn't see that coming from a mile away.Cross-play was never going to save Evolve. There was far too many core issues with the game.