I think he's done with forums after being stalked online for several years by a bunch of weirdos.Am I part of the problem considering I hopped in here and the first thing I did was ctrl+F Bobbyroberts
I think he's done with forums after being stalked online for several years by a bunch of weirdos.Am I part of the problem considering I hopped in here and the first thing I did was ctrl+F Bobbyroberts
Huh.Yes, under George wiping out the Sith = bringing balance, because balance isn't about light and dark being equal, it's about the Force functioning harmoniously.
Luke learns a couple different lessons about the Force from non-Jedi in TLOLS.
First, in the form of "the Tide", he is taught the perspective that there is no light side and dark side but one big "tide" with ebbs and flows.
Secondly, from the Mist-Weavers, he hears this discussion about himself (which I've abridged):
"I sense a rot in the Mist.... There are...so many holes in the Mist. A darkness has come and corrupted it."
The pain of watching our beloved Mist so debased was wrenching.
"Bright-Heart means to restore the beauty of the Mist."
I think there is a natural "darkness" to the Force, but the corruption of it by Sith and others for their own purposes creates the "imbalance" or lack of harmony. Restoring the balance is restoring the Force to its natural state.
Yeah but the part where Ezra falls into their path and just says "hey" and Thrawn simply replies "fascinating" was pretty great. The voice they chose for him was pretty perfect.Yaaas, new hair color and armor paint for Sabine...<ahem> I mean, interesting that they chose to change Sabine's look 5 episodes into the season.
And btw, Thrawnstanding and shooting at a tie fighter is just stupid. He has no powers. I really don't like that they write him as this ultimate bad ass.
Just the Star Wars and Vader series. There are series for other characters like Poe, Aphra, Phasma, Mace Windu.Are most of the Star Wars comics centered around the core characters now? Like Luke, Leia, Vader, etc.
Not Doctor Aphra, which interestingly enough, is also the best one. By far.Are most of the Star Wars comics centered around the core characters now? Like Luke, Leia, Vader, etc.
Yeah this was a well conducted interview. I've been impressed with the lady that does the SW show. She knows how to do it!Kathy hints at the possibility that we'll get more movies with Rey past Episode 9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tm32FFFbAOk&feature=youtu.be&t=344
If Rey ever dies..
New footage. I stopped it as soon as I saw a clip I hadn't seen before.
Yeah, I bailed the fuck out of that right away. I'm trying to not watch anything else that hasn't been shown in the teaser and trailer.WOW
.. UH WHAT THAT WAS A LOT EINCHY
THAT WAS MORE THAN IN THE INT TRAILER
EinchyYeah, I bailed the fuck out of that right away. I'm trying to not watch anything else that hasn't been shown in the teaser and trailer.
Man
Clearly it's Rey revealing that she is Luke's father.So who wants to know what that final shot with Rey and Luke is about? :p
I got theories but can't say anything because they're based on leaks.So who wants to know what that final shot with Rey and Luke is about? :p
/waves handI got theories but can't say anything because they're based on leaks.
BEGUN TO YOUR LEAK THREADI got theories but can't say anything because they're based on leaks.
I got theories but can't say anything because they're based on leaks.
I can't really explain why that story was great but I hated the similar meta-jokey ending to From A Certain Point Of View. Probably helps to have the comedy of Luke sitting there indulging that nonsense.Oh this first story in The Legends of Luke book. I'm dying laughing here. Somebody telling their conspiracy theories about Luke Clodhopper and the O'Kenoby gang riding around the galaxy in the Century Turkey. Talking about how General Solo is rumored to be a bit of a rogue and would shoot first. New Republic govt purged any evidence of him that'd make him seem less than heroic. Alderaan's destruction was staged. If you examine the footage closely some shots show just a big ball of sparks and others show an expanding ring how could the same event have two different filmed versions? Clearly faked.
Loving this so far
Here here.Also, anyone else excited for the campaign for Battlefront II? I've been wanting a big budget single-player Star Wars game for ages now, I really hope it delivers. After the news about Visceral Games and what's happening to their Star Wars games, I will be super disappointed if BFII's campaign is not good.
The scar thing was Rian Johnson's decision. They tried with the scar in the place that it was in TFA but he felt it looked dumb, so he moved it. This had nothing to do with Disney.For example, the placement of Kylo's scar is out of place in The Last Jedi. Such a little detail like that shows that Disney isn't really that caring about the films and their quality (outside of ratings), but more the money they'll bring in through tickets and merch.
The scar thing was Rian Johnson's decision. They tried with the scar in the place that it was in TFA but he felt it looked dumb, so he moved it. This had nothing to do with Disney.
And why do you think Disney (which is actually LucasFilm) doesn't care about the quality of the film? Let me ask you this, would a company that doesn't care about the quality of a film fire their directors 5 months into filming because they felt the movie wasn't good enough? They cared SO much about the quality of these films that they pushed The Force Awakens from May to December because JJ wanted more time. They cared so much about the quality of these films that they had MASSIVE amount of re-shoots for Rogue One's third act (which ended up being highly praised). They cared SO much about the quality of Episode 9 that after multiple rewrites of the script, and bringing in a new person to help out the old director, they ended up bringing back JJ and a new team because the old one wasn't good enough.
What exactly have they done that tells you that they just don't care about the quality of the films? That Rian Johnson moved a scare to be more visually appealing?
Because he's the bad guy and it looked "goofy".Why would Kylo Ren, quite literally the bad guy, need to look visually appealing, unless you're planning on selling his looks via merch to the widest demographic possible?
His scar now looks nothing but a slightly edgy mark to appeal to teenagers that crush on his looks.
He'd look much more sinister if his facial disfigurements stayed as disfigurements.
Which is why Rian Johnson moved it, because details matter. Do you honestly think details don't matter to Rian Johnson? That he's half assing this movie and moved a scar to sell toys? And appealing doesn't mean he has to look pretty, because he doesn't even look pretty right now, he has nightmare fuel mechanical stitches.Attention to detail matters. It says a lot about quality and dedication. This is like changing the positioning and shape of Harry Potter's scar for no actual reason after two or three films.
Because he's the bad guy and it looked "goofy".
Why do you want the bad guy to look goofy?
Which is why Rian Johnson moved it, because details matter. Do you honestly think details don't matter to Rian Johnson? That he's half assing this movie and moved a scar to sell toys? And appealing doesn't mean he has to look pretty, because he doesn't even look pretty right now, he has nightmare fuel mechanical stitches.
Why'd they even get Rian Johnson to direct when it seems like you know more about his own decisions than he does.I highly doubt it looked 'goofy'. Unappealing? Yes. But that would've made him more intimidating as a villain.
What's goofy is having a giant cut run across a character's face and then the next film having the scar in a completely different area.
Why'd they even get Rian Johnson to direct when it seems like you know more about his own decisions than he does.
Is anyone else starting to feel a little overwhelmed with Star Wars?
I want to be excited for the next entries, but the last two films haven't been particularly great.
For example, the placement of Kylo's scar is out of place in The Last Jedi. Such a little detail like that shows that Disney isn't really that caring about the films and their quality (outside of ratings), but more the money they'll bring in through tickets and merch.
How is it carelessness if he looked at both options and he went with the one he liked? Carelessness is something you're injecting when the evidence says otherwise. Help me understand how he doesn't care, when he cared enough to change something because he didn't liked how it looked, isn't that literally the opposite of not caring? If you don't care, you just don't bother with it but he bothered with it. He doesn't care so he went as far as to explain WHY it was changed so the fans knew? That's someone that doesn't care in your eyes?So me pointing out blatant carelessness for quality and detail pushes you to that type of response? Great.
New footage. I stopped it as soon as I saw a clip I hadn't seen before.