I guess it's supposed to illustrate how it's failing everyone in this case. But it's just hard to feel much sympathy for her when it's basically like she's batting away the rope that keeps getting thrown to save her from drowning. Like someone else said, I guess this is more of a story of addiction and how difficult it is to help someone with mental health issues.from the article:
"But Fairley regularly skipped her hearings—she'd lose track of the dates, she later told me, and just had "a lot going on"—which slowed the process of resolving the cases. Again and again, in her absence, the judge would issue bench warrants, and Fairley would eventually be arrested and booked into jail, from which the judge would release her to await her next hearing, with demands that she report to diversion programs or Narcotics Anonymous meetings—all while neighbors continued to report on Nextdoor that they were watching her steal mail."
The judge was even releasing her so she didn't have to sit in jail with the mild stipulation that she go to rehabilitation program meetings....and she kept stealing packages instead.
At some point the individual has to accept responsibility for their own actions
Criminal justice reform doesn't mean ignoring crimes committed by the poor, or punishing criminals period.There are several options Amazon already provides: Locker (at 7 Elevens, etc.), car trunk package deposit (for newer ve), front door package deposit (via home security systems).
I thought we were all about criminal justice reform, minimizing surveillance, and not harshly punishing petty criminals. Guess it's different when it's the toys we order online that are at stake? I mean, in this case, the porch pirate lost her daughter and her home, but wound up going back to stealing almost immediately. Who's better off now?
In this case, at least, we had a rehabilitative justice system. This thief was given chance after chance and let off the hook by the criminal justice system only to spit on her opportunities for rehabilitation and continue committing crimes.Nextdoor is shit. I feel bad for this woman on account of her homelessness, addiction, and pretty clear kleptomania, but obviously stealing packages is also wrong. If we had a rehabilitative justice system then perhaps she'd be doing better.
Nextdoor is basically, "there's a person of color in the area, everyone be in alert" all day, everyday.
Are you in a next door? Because that is not remotely true. 98% of the conversation is either package thieves, dogs shitting on their lawn, or the way people drive
They've been doing this for two years now.
More importantly, the system doesn't do anything to disuade you from doing such things, you just end up shifted around, and usually deposited right back where you were, with less stuff.
Putting people in jail for petty theft is not helpful. It destabilizes people and perpetuates harm. Do you really expect someone with a history of addiction, homelessness and possibly trauma to think about this the same way you do? In the article, she is quoted as saying she lives day by day - future threats of jail are not a deterrent for these situations.
SF is Democrat City. What should the city do about/for/with the woman in question, who's now homeless and still stealing packages?