I clicked the link and read the entire description of the gameplay. What the fuck man.Times are changing and regulatory bodies as well as Governments will be paying more attention
https://videostandards.org.uk/ratingboard/featured.html
And even Nutaku refused to sell Imolicious. Says a lot.People getting upset about this would be pretty silly when there's sites like Nutaku that sell tons of hentai games.
Correct, I guess this is a problem of me only using information from a brief conversation. Still, from what I heard, while more independent, most students don't really have nostalgia for college as they do for highschool even with their being less stress from worrying about entry exams. Do you have another explanation for this?Huh, you know that in highschool you can also opt to not be on a club, right? Also, in college there's many clubs too out there but of course, unlike highschool people are more independent for obvious reasons.
Wait, so was it ban even though it was a censored version put on steam, or did they put the wrong version on steam, and now are ban from even putting the safer version on it.Some people misunderstand the situation.
http://hgb.nekonyansoft.com/
Steam version was supposed to be a censored version, but still banned.
Correct, I guess this is a problem of me only using information from a brief conversation. Still, from what I heard, while more independent, most students don't really have nostalgia for college as they do for highschool even with their being less stress from worrying about entry exams. Do you have another explanation for this?
Even manga with a college background that I have read mostly consider it an afterthought, or an annoyance. Something people go to for the attendance credit.
All you guys poking fun at 1000 years loli's offends me. You just don't get it. It's totally ok to fantasize about having sex with these characters! Never mind the fact that they look like little girls, sound like little girls and act like little girls.
Hold on I'm hearing sirens in front of my house. Did someone just force my door ophvcczcbjjjjkmccxadhnnllbfvxfd
Eh I'm fine with this over the Sony version of censoring even sexualized adults.
I don't know what's more disgusting. The existence of these games, or that there are people out there that buy porn games.
It's a joke, on why anyone would pay for porn when it's free by various means.Uh, you realize there are eroge games that don't have little girl looking characters right? Calling people who enjoy those games disgusting is ridiculous, unless you were referring to young looking girl games by your last sentence, than I apologize.
I don't know what's more disgusting. The existence of these games, or that there are people out there that buy porn games.
Again, why does everyone keep posting Sony ever allowed those games. There is a hughe difference between let's say Onichanbara and the games that got banned from steam and even hentai sites. There have never ever been games like that on Sony platforms.How about Valve/Sony allow these stuff in first place ?
They would not make a rule/ban if something not happend to them.
Jesus I had never heard of them and googled that- nightmaresThat banner is giving me nightmares.
Good riddance.
Bruhhhhhhh
The steam version is censored, in a sense, all the VN are All Age and you need to contact the publisher to get an 18+ patch. Steam had the page up for the All Age version of Hello, Goodbye but removed it due to reasons. The game hasnt been release yet. Steam didnt inform NekoNyan, English publisher, why Hello, Goodbye was removed.Wait, so was it ban even though it was a censored version put on steam, or did they put the wrong version on steam, and now are ban from even putting the safer version on it.
i'll have you know i love shooting people in CoD and i'm a perfectly well-adjusted individual. anyway, here's why i think banning pedo games is wrong:
I know it's subjective and all, but those girls definitely look underage still in school type.I don't play any of the games affected but I do feel like there may be an argument to be made for them. For one, from what it says in the OP, these characters appear to be (or appear to look like) high school students, so maybe around 16 or 17. At that age you're able to have consensual, uncoerced sex with someone without it having to be "exploitative". The main reason why the porn featuring under-18s tends to be banned (even in countries where the age of consent is well below 18) is that, once you add commercial motives, the potential for the exploitation and abuse of those hypothetical performers increases dramatically. However, with video games, we're talking about virtual characters so there are no underage people involved in their production who could be exploited or abused. It's a bit like live action porn featuring adult actors doing some teacher/student role-playing. Never heard anyone call for a ban on those specifically.
The only real issue I could see with these games is that, if they do feature sexually exploitative and/or abusive situations (which, again, just standard consensual sex featuring a slightly-younger-than-18-year-old does not automatically qualify for that), they may not contextualise them properly and normalise them instead. But for that, you really would have to look at each game individually and see if that's the case.
At the end of the day, it is Steam's right, of course, to decide what they want to sell but this feels more like them jumping on the pseudo-pedo hysteria bandwagon than making an informed, well-thought-out decision.
Since when is Nintendo the benchmark when it comes to this? They should be called out on their shit not be used as a benchmark for what is allowed and what is not.Sony America is going on a censorship rampage, censoring games that even Nintendo doesn't have a problem with, going as far as to censor games in Japan, for the Japanese market (while Sony Japan says nothing about it, because there's no talking to Sony America once they get into one of these moods).
Wait, so was it ban even though it was a censored version put on steam, or did they put the wrong version on steam, and now are ban from even putting the safer version on it.
But what does that have to do with Sony's content restrictions on the game though? Because from what we've learnt so far, none of it had anything to do with Marie Rose. She's still in the game, and can still be dressed up in the skimpiest of outfits and ogled at as much as the player wants. What they did remand the removal of was an item that increases breast jiggle... Which is not the first thing I think about when people talk about stopping the sexualisation of minors.I'd post pictures of Marie Rose, but I'm worried I'd end up on a list somewhere.
You're not incorrect about that part. School time in all of it's periods but more highschool is the period more valorized by many japanese being in school and all because of clubs, less pressure of the life and such. It's a thing that also happens in other countries as well but in japan people makes content about those periods. In my case I can say that I can agree with them considering that I miss my time at highschool for various reasons so I think it's similar for many of them outside of what I mentioned before. The life after school os quite difficult after all compared to it. hahaha
s developers say they've taken great pains to ensure that their game demonstrates, on multiple occasions, that its students are of age. This includes scenes where they peruse 18+ manga and are ID-ed before being allowed into an adult bookstore.
Honest question why has there been no attempt to remove this stuff from other U.S. and European facing stores that are not Steam?
This is Nowi the 700 year old dragon all over again :D . Here's a wild thought: if you feel the need to point out in your game "these characters are of legal age, OK? Here, see how they're doing adult things?" perhaps you know full well what you're doing.
My guess would be that many of these stores are Japan-owned, and we all know how Japan goes about this stuff. I have no clue how Microsoft's XBox store is about this.