The full opinion is
here, and the accompanying order
here.
It dismisses not only Trump's motion to dismiss for Presidential immunity, but also his motion to dismiss on constitutional grounds (1st amendment, double jeopardy, due process).
There's also a minute order denying Trump's motion to stay the case pending resolution of his immunity claim. Of course what Trump
meant was that the case should be stayed until all appeals had run their course, but his motion was so circumlocutory that he never actually
said that. So Judge Chutkan just denied it as moot following her earlier ruling.
It's a throrough ruling, as we've come to expect of Chutkan. It cites, twice, the DC Circuit''s ruling earlier in the day in
Blassingame v Trump, and includes an apparently gratuitous reference to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 on the purposes of criminal sentencing (nothing is really gratuitous in Chutkan's rulings, so I take this as a warning shot on likely sentencing).
There's also this nice paragraph
....
Against the weight of that history, Defendant argues in essence that because no other former Presidents have been criminally prosecuted, it would be unconstitutional to start now. Immunity Motion at 15–16. But while a former President's prosecution is unprecedented, so too are the allegations that a President committed the crimes with which Defendant is charged.
There are now only five outstanding motions, of which three are fully-briefed and awaiting rulings (Trump's motions to dismiss on statutory grounds and for selective/vindictive prosecution; and the media coalition motion for cameras in the courtroom) and two that will be briefed in December (Trump's motions to compel discovery and to redefine the scope of the 'prosecution team').
