It's the why. He specifically did it because he wanted to hurt CNN.
Doing the right thing for the wrong reasons. At least there's that.
preventing a merger i meantNo, I'm pretty sure the corruption of law enforcement for political ends (the silencing of critical press) is not, under any definition, "good."
When its being used as a weapon against journalism, not so much.
Yeah but completely illegal
If Trump has succeeded in blocking this merger for the reasons he had then it would have been a very bad thing as it would set a ridiculously bad precedent.
I don't care what the results are, a president successfully meddling in a merger because he wanted to punish journalists would have been a catastrophic precedent.
I know a few here that will like this news. (I guess good for Disney that Trump likes Murdoch?)
I know a few here that will like this news. (I guess good for Disney that Trump likes Murdoch?)
to punish cnn.
Time Warner owns CNN. Trump doesn't like CNN's coverage of him so he tried to punish its parent company by blocking the merger Time Warner wanted.
Is that even allowed, I mean as POTUS ?Time Warner owns CNN. Trump doesn't like CNN's coverage of him so he tried to punish its parent company by blocking the merger Time Warner wanted.
pretty sure its illegal solely because of the "why".
no, but when has that stopped Trump? In any case, per the New Yorker story this is sourced from, Cohn was very opposed to pressuring DOJ about the merger and didn't do it, but it's possible someone else (looking at you, John Kelly) did end up making the call. We don't know. This might be like the times he ordered someone to fire Mueller but the person he gave the order to realized it would be a bad idea and just... didn't.
Add it to the list of shit that is 100% an impeachable offense.
This picture still cracks me up by how insanely evil they both look.
Lmao why does everyone surrounding Trump look like a fucking Bond villainThis picture still cracks me up by how insanely evil they both look.