Do you know how long and at what cost such an audit would take? And for every company involved (there's a whole chain of suppliers - how deep should they go?) This is not a reasonable position to take.Never said they were.
But you think a console manufacturer shouldn't have any due diligence in place that the games, pubs and devs they highlight in their HEAVILY CURATED SHOWCASE don't have abusive conditions?
This is slavery.CCO testament.docx said:3 members of the art team are let go during COVID, the decision is forced again on everyonewith the pretense that budget needs to be saved and dates need to be changed. One asked tostay for free and was given that opportunity with various pressure pointsadded on him. Laterreceiving small amounts of cash each month to "not die"
Do you know how long and at what cost such an audit would take? And for every company involved (there's a whole chain of suppliers - how deep should they go?) This is not a reasonable position to take.
Psychological and emotional manipulation.Investor is present and various things are discussed. The point aboutovertime is agreed on andaccepted eventually. CCO asks to see the calculation of his overtime that the CEO is sayingexists, but refuses to give it and deflectsaggressively. It is obvious no such paper has everexisted. CCO is reminded about the situation with his parents and that he should think aboutmoney. (Father in critical condition/deceased at this time, Mother requiring care and funds forstage 4 cancer treatment)
Exactly, Sony must demand that publishers allow a team of auditors to interview developments teams. Of course, those auditors must be flown fly around the world to conduct these interviews, so that they can inspect the working environment of the developers that aren't under their employment.Never said they were.
But you think a console manufacturer shouldn't have any due diligence in place that the games, pubs and devs they highlight in their HEAVILY CURATED SHOWCASE don't have abusive conditions?
Exactly, Sony must demand that publishers allow a team of auditors to interview developments teams. Of course, those auditors must be flown fly around the world to conduct these interviews, so that they can inspect the working environment of the developers that aren't under their employment.
Then Focus can have their 60 second trailer.
i'm not sure why you are doubling down on this while still avoiding the main point. Third party auditing costs resources, money, travel (given current situation), and remember the game is not platform exclusive. so aside from publisher and studio, who else would have any stake in performing that edit? who else would even have the right to audit them?You're right.
Having third-party auditing to ensure the health and safety of developers shouldn't be considered.
Just leave it to the Studio and Publisher. Because that's clearly working.
Three checks-and-balances is better than two, you say!
There would be nothing to boycott. This game will never come outThe audio of the CEO rejecting the resignation reminded me of literally all my shithead bosses. This sucks, hope the devs get whats theirs.
Do we boycott? Is that the move here?
i'm not sure why you are doubling down on this while still avoiding the main point. Third party auditing costs resources, money, travel (given current situation), and remember the game is not platform exclusive. so aside from publisher and studio, who else would have any stake in performing that edit? who else would even have the right to audit them?
it's not like any editor actually paid for the thing and has the right to have any look at it.
if a studio and a publisher approaches a major editor, i doubt they will accept their business to be closelyinspected.
Costs, Resources, Money of a massive publisher > Ensuring Developer Health
That's literally all I get from your argument.
Have you considered the implications of what you are asking for? Audit's are really expensive, time consuming, not to mention you are asking companies to give Sony access to personal records etc? Private information like salary and health data? Interviewing staff?You're right.
Having third-party auditing to ensure the health and safety of developers shouldn't be considered.
Just leave it to the Studio and Publisher. Because that's clearly working.
Three checks-and-balances is better than two, you say!
Holy hell the Assistant Narrative Director's account is the motherload of the worst stuff, as she is speaking out as person who was in power:
I recommend reading her entire account because these four excerpts aren't even everything. I couldn't screenshot it all.
She was one of the good ones for sure.
Damn. Just damn.
Wait. How the game got on SoP if there are no devs at all? wtfff
Jesus, what are you blabbering about?
1) If Sony shows a game at their heavily curated event, shouldn't they take at least a few steps to ensure everything is kosher with the team behind it?
2) Auditors - even amidst COVID-19 - can still interview employees, can they not? Have you tried a thing called Zoom lately?
It's not hard to at least briefly audit the games you showcase and highlight as synonymous with your brand.
She really did push back at him on that. Since most won't click the link I want to post this exchange she shared. X: Her Y: CEOthis is downright terrifying....
and this is actually very bad management. handling a team by fear is a proof of failure, always.
this is downright terrifying....
and this is actually very bad management. handling a team by fear is a proof of failure, always.
already looked him up on linked-in. likely has no idea what he is doingYeah, its the complete opposite of what you should do, how are there people this stupid still walking around and in charge of business's.
There's no reason to expect Sony knew about any of this when they agreed to put the game on State of Play.
unless they were completely hoodwinked by the management at LSG, i dont see how they didnt get at least a whiff of thisIs it Focus Home Interactive that is the bad guy in all this? If so, I'm staying away from their games.
Agreed. Terrifying is a good description of the horror show described there. I really hope that once the full truth comes out Sony will drop the game like a hot potato. But at the same time, I don't get the rest of you people insisting that Sony should have vetted this company before they included it in the SoP.this is downright terrifying....
and this is actually very bad management. handling a team by fear is a proof of failure, always.
you're missing the point again, and you are putting words i never said into my mouth.
Noone ever said any sort of audit or control should not be done. it is actually even preferable. But since in the publishing chain there is no one above the publisher in that specific case, this is as far as it goes. Now there are public/legal instances for this.
If sony or any other editor bought anythng in there (the IP, or an exclusivity, or even the studio), then yeah, probably they would have had regular reports, audits, to see where the game is headed.
your initial point was that sony should have known. but in the current case, if sony would have gone to them to have regular reports, the studio would tell them to fuck off, and they would be right, sony is not entitled to know.
do we have a common ground?