Usually I welcome choice, and the guy playing Alexios is lovely, but Kassandra is definitely more fun so in this case I think Ubi made a mistake by not making her the only character
Then again maybe the sales would have been lower if Alexios was not available, seeing as most people played as him (which makes sense, core gamers are predominantly men and most men prefer playing as men, me included...Kassandra is an exception).
There are multiple perspectives to it, they probaly didn't make a mistake from financial one and from "players can choose" one, but on the other hand if they focused on Kassandra they could have tailored the story around her better.They made a mistake by letting players choose what they want? Lol.
I rank mine as Ezio > Bayek > Kassandra > Edward KenwayKassandra is the best AC protagonist since Ezio. I just want more of her.
Not gonna lie, it's kind of how you came across, especially by calling her post an "outburst". I suggest you try to listen and empathize instead of being dismissive next time.How is this ridiculous? You are making it sound as if I'm telling her to be quiet and sit down when I pointed out that there have been female protagonists in AC before.
Not really. It's easy to see why someone would be unimpressed by spin-off and partial protagonists vs a plethora of fully dedicated male protagonists.They could have just as easily all been male and they this would be an entirely different conversation.
Indeed and I already explained this to this poster...There are multiple perspectives to it, they probaly didn't make a mistake from financial one and from "players can choose" one, but on the other hand if they focused on Kassandra they could have tailored the story around her better.
Can you point out the so-called "hate", by the way?
You say they are cheeky, i say they are not.Can you point out the so-called "hate", by the way?
The worst I've seen are some cheeky "you chose poorly" jabs, and almost all of those are simply because they think Kassandra's VA is better.
Relax, guys.
This is why Ubisoft didn't and shouldn't have Kassandra as the only choice in this game. They would've had a bigger shitstorm on their hands than Dice did with Battlefield V.Makes sense, it's a game set in ancient greece and you play as a spartan.
If they ever visit ancient Greece again......they can do one with Amazons!!..................... we'll never get a mainline entry from a dedicated and fully female protagonist perspective, and that's too bad.
I don't know why she is upset. Didn't we just have Aveline in Liberation, Evie in Syndicate, and now Kassandra in Odyssey? Why call the developers cowards for giving choice? Weird outburst.
This is why Ubisoft didn't and shouldn't have Kassandra as the only choice in this game. They would've had a bigger shitstorm on their hands than Dice did with Battlefield V.
If they ever visit ancient Greece again......they can do one with Amazons!!
That would make sense to have a dedicated female protagonist perspective only, not this one.
I really enjoyed playing as Kassandra, it felt like the proper choice.
Comparing Ubi's statistics with era's main thread poll just goes to show what an ultra progressive place this is.
It's not different at all. All the lines are the same, npcs respond to you same no matter what gender you choose. Cutscenes are the same except for different facial animations.Is the game really that different between the 2 options? I did not play it but I expect same of everything except voice and character model, not even different animations, am I wrong?
If two-thirds of players are still choosing the male character (despite being inferior according to most), it's not exactly "cowardly" to keep the male character as an option, is it? It's just smart business. Odyssey might have been a better game if it was Kassandra's sole story, but it's very likely that it would've sold fewer copies as well. Ubisoft maximizes their potential customer base by having two protagonists.As for the "cowards" thing, there's no need to take this personally, lol (unless you work at Ubisoft). I don't think Ubi's reasons are necessarily cowardly, but I don't blame some people for making that jab. Especially since they've said that going forward it's always gonna be a choice, so we'll never get a mainline entry from a dedicated and fully female protagonist perspective, and that's too bad.
Not disagreeing that this place is ultra progressive but just because you picked Alexios to play as does not mean you aren't a progressive person.
There is nothing inherently wrong with preferring to play as male. Just like there is nothing wrong with people wanting to play as a female ( and they obviously have had less opportunity in years gone).
The problem lies where if people take issue with playing as a female character. Where if Kassandra was the only playable character then you would kick up a fuss.
As I said I personally prefer playing a male character so naturally chose Alexios but if it wasn't an option and I had to play as Kassandra that would have no bearing of my enjoyment of the game.
You're taking this all far too seriously.It's guilting people for choosing to play as a man........that's the whole point of a choice....
People are ridiculous.
Refusing to take the mildest of risks (Ubisoft business isn't hurting at all) and taking the so-called safest business choice is pretty much exactly what she meant by cowardice.If two-thirds of players are still choosing the male character (despite being inferior according to most), it's not exactly "cowardly" to keep the male character as an option, is it? It's just smart business. Odyssey might have been a better game if it was Kassandra's sole story, but it's very likely that it would've sold fewer copies as well. Ubisoft maximizes their potential customer base by having two protagonists.
I am gay, I like men, hence played as Alexios. Screw you if you are going to try and shame me for not picking Kassandra.
I suppose, but just because a company's business isn't hurting doesn't mean they're going to turn down revenue for no reason. Especially not a publicly traded company like Ubi. Going with a female-only lead is unlikely to have increased sales. Best case scenario, they would've done as well as they generally do anyway. In the eyes of the bean counters, there are only potential cons there, no pros.Refusing to take the mildest of risks (Ubisoft business isn't hurting at all) and taking the so-called safest business choice is pretty much exactly what she meant by cowardice.
By that logic, no game dev should ever make games featuring dedicated female protagonists, since a male protags would "always sell more". Fortunately, the makers of Mirrors Edge, Horizon, Tomb Raider, etc. have decided to "take those risks". Hell, even Ubisoft did, too, by making Bayek and Marcus Holloway black men instead of white men.I suppose, but just because a company's business isn't hurting doesn't mean they're going to turn down revenue for no reason. Especially not a publicly traded company like Ubi. Going with a female-only lead is unlikely to have increased sales. Best case scenario, they would've done as well as they generally do anyway. In the eyes of the bean counters, there are only potential cons there, no pros.
True. I guess I'm just judging Assassin's Creed as more of a "dudebro" franchise like Call of Duty. Maybe that isn't fair to it, I dunno. I admittedly haven't played one in a while.By that logic, no game dev should ever make games featuring dedicated female protagonists, since a male protags would "always sell more". Fortunately, the makers of Mirrors Edge, Horizon, Tomb Raider, etc. have decided to "take those risks". Hell, even Ubisoft did, too, by making Bayek and Marcus Holloway black men instead of white men.
Guess you must have missed the thread, lots of gaming sites, lots of reviewers and gaming personalities on twitter and youtube saying if you played Alexios 'you did it wrong' as if you should automatically play the female option out of obligation just because the option is there.
Yeah, Alexios was presented as the default choice in pretty much all marketing material, including the front cover of the game itself. Hardly surprising that most players then chose to play as Alexios. I'll also wager that most meal purchases in Burger King include a burger, and not a chicken sandwich.Curious to see how marketing did/did not affect this, as I remember most of it revolving around Alexios rather than Kassandra. Granted, Marketing vs. Playable Representation are related yet separate issues, it would still be interesting to see the effect of one on the other.