The SNP returning to their Tartan Tory roots?
Genuinely shocking.
And? Would you rather they just gave out new contracts to private companies when they expire.
is that just the first setTee hee.
Laurence Fox ordered to pay £180,000 to two people he called ‘paedophiles’
High court judge orders actor turned politician to pay £90,000 damages to each individual for social media libelwww.theguardian.com
If we go to elections for Scotland, do we need to do it again come general election?
View: https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1783181689461596266?t=VgCO6seY7fS2vHzhFfJBpA&s=19
Nice glass of water you're drinking there. Shame if it were full of shit particles...
Wouldn't bet on it. Not until the first planes take off.Whispers in the office today about a dissolution of Parliament on Monday.
Unsure if true.
Somehow I don't think even Tory voters are happy with the way water companies have been acting.Tory voters, I think we'd all agree, like gigantic piles of shit.
Labour's only plan is to appeal to Tory voters.
ergo, more shit is good.
Do we know how much money would be wasted if they did a general election six weeks after the May elections rather than bundling them together?Its believed by some civil servants a leadership election will follow May 2nd.
It won't if parliament is dissolved.
View: https://twitter.com/LeftieStats/status/1783181689461596266?t=VgCO6seY7fS2vHzhFfJBpA&s=19
Nice glass of water you're drinking there. Shame if it were full of shit particles...
Tory voters, I think we'd all agree, like gigantic piles of shit.
Labour's only plan is to appeal to Tory voters.
ergo, more shit is good.
(1) A person exercising a regulatory function to which this section applies must, in the exercise of the function, have regard to the desirability of promoting economic growth.
(2) In performing the duty under subsection (1), the person must, in particular, consider the importance for the promotion of economic growth of exercising the regulatory function in a way which ensures that—
(a)regulatory action is taken only when it is needed, and
(b)any action taken is proportionate.
Do we know how much money would be wasted if they did a general election six weeks after the May elections rather than bundling them together?
If the locals are the disaster that the polls predict Sunak will likely call an election because the Tories will try to oust him anyway.
If the locals are better for the Tories than they expect then they will call an election hoping they have some momentum and to stem any losses further in the year.
That's my thinking. In both generous the locals would lead to sizeable chunks of the tories pushing for an election, be it a leadership one or a Westminster one.
It sounds like it only adds another hurdle for those authorities to take regulatory action, ergo it makes it harder for them to do so and therefore that tweet from LeftieStats is fair? (Although I agree it's a uselessly dishonest account in general)Having just done a bit of research it appears that the tweet is massively misleading as you might expect from that twitter account.
The amendment that was voted on was to add the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority, the Office of Communications and the Water Services Regulation Authority to the authorities listed under the pre-existing Economic Growth (Regulatory Functions) Order 2017. You can find the extensive list of authorities this already covered here. By my count 44 authorities already fell under this Order.
The long and short of it is that amending the existing order now means that the following applies to those three authorities:
If you read the initial Guardian article it contains a quote from Tim Farron, probably because it was the Lib Dems who forced a vote on this, and the CEO of an environment organisation who also just happens to be a Lib Dem as the only opposition to this vote. I'd also say the tweet was clearly trying to imply that this was a specific vote on water pollution which wasn't at all the case.
It seems to me that this doesn't materially weaken the regulator's ability to fine water companies for pollution nor have I seen a particular outrage from people I would expect if this was true beyond that one Guardian article and the misleading tweet from that account. For example, Caroline Lucas voted against the amendment but hasn't even mentioned it from what I can see. She was far more focused on the Renters Reform Bill that day.
Personally, I'm not a fan of deregulation and I don't see why any authority should require a regard for economic growth but the amendment wasn't about what the tweet suggested and while I disagree with the original legislation needing to exist in the first place I would say including the scope of it to more authorities isn't particularly controversial.
It probably says something that there wasn't a single Labour rebellion on this, even Diane Abbott voted in favour as an independent MP, while most of the Labour front bench (inc. Starmer) appear to have abstained.
Rats and sinking ships
Top Tory MP defects to Labour in fury at NHS crisis
Ex-health minister Dan Poulter who also works as a hospital doctor, says Conservatives have become ‘nationalist party of the right’www.theguardian.com
Still a Tory.Rats and sinking ships
Top Tory MP defects to Labour in fury at NHS crisis
Ex-health minister Dan Poulter who also works as a hospital doctor, says Conservatives have become ‘nationalist party of the right’www.theguardian.com
Tory staff running network of anti-Ulez Facebook groups riddled with racism and abuse
Investigation finds groups hosting Islamophobic attacks on London mayor Sadiq Khan, white supremacist slogans and antisemitic conspiracy theorieswww.theguardian.com