This is a good idea.You know that bar at the top showing the D/R numbers would probably fit in the banner nicely.
Notes on Tuesday and Friday:Upcoming Mueller dates to watch:
Dec 4: Flynn sentencing memo due
Dec 5(?): Cohen sentencing memo due (SDNY)
Dec 7: Manafort sentencing memo due
Dec 12: Cohen sentencing
Dec 14: Mystery appellant hearing (closed session, very likely we'll learn nothing)
Dec 18: Flynn sentencing
President Sharpton and VP Dodd did a bang-up job, for sure.A poll taken around the same in 2006:
Hillary Clinton 33%
John Edwards 14%
Al Gore 13%
Barack Obama 12%
John Kerry 5%
Joe Biden 3%
Evan Bayh 1%
Wesley Clark 1%
Bill Richardson 1%
Tom Vilsack 1%
Christopher Dodd 0%
Al Sharpton 0%
Vilsack is surging! How'd his name ever get on that list in the first place? Let me guess, some kind of moderate darling purple state governor thing? I remember ZERO about the 2008 primaries other than Obama vs Clinton. That's how crappy everyone else was.
And who can forget frontrunner Rudy Giuliani?A poll taken around the same in 2006:
Hillary Clinton 33%
John Edwards 14%
Al Gore 13%
Barack Obama 12%
John Kerry 5%
Joe Biden 3%
Evan Bayh 1%
Wesley Clark 1%
Bill Richardson 1%
Tom Vilsack 1%
Christopher Dodd 0%
Al Sharpton 0%
After 2004, some thought Democrats could only win by running a Clintonite centrist who could appeal to southern/midwestern whites. That's why people overhyped guys like Vilsack, Bayh, and Mark Warner in 2005/06. Kerry just ran an uninspiring campaign in contrast to Bush. Dean was a more exciting candidate. If Democrats are voting against Trump rather than for the Democratic nominee, it'll be a harder task to win like 2004.Vilsack is surging! How'd his name ever get on that list in the first place? Let me guess, some kind of moderate darling purple state governor thing? I remember ZERO about the 2008 primaries other than Obama vs Clinton. That's how crappy everyone else was.
How could you forget John Edwards?Vilsack is surging! How'd his name ever get on that list in the first place? Let me guess, some kind of moderate darling purple state governor thing? I remember ZERO about the 2008 primaries other than Obama vs Clinton. That's how crappy everyone else was.
Almost certain at this point.Surely NC-09 has to have new elections for that seat? Anything short of that is democracy subverted. Imagine if it was on the other foot with a Democrat, Trump would be catatonic.
After 2004, some thought Democrats could only win by running a Clintonite centrist who could appeal to southern/midwestern whites. That's why people overhyped guys like Vilsack, Bayh, and Mark Warner in 2005/06. Kerry just ran an uninspiring campaign in contrast to Bush. Dean was a more exciting candidate. If Democrats are voting against Trump rather than for the Democratic nominee, it'll be a harder task to win like 2004.
Can't give you that but we can give you a young sweaty white guy who streams his house to the internet.Is it too much to ask for our country to support a bid for a young woman of color to run in 2020? I'm tired of musing about these dusty old farts. 😞
Is it too much to ask for our country to support a bid for a young woman of color to run in 2020? I'm tired of musing about these dusty old farts. 😞
The elections board has collected information suggesting that high-level officials in the campaign may have been aware of Dowless's activities, according to the two people.
No longer any reasonable doubt as to absentee fraud perpetrated by pro-Harris forces in #NC09 in both primary and general.
Now questions are: how widespread and who knew?
It doesn't sound like there are any clear rules regarding this scenario. I think Harris is legally allowed to just run again, even though he/his campaign clearly knew or perpetrated the fraud.So uh if one of the candidates is confirmed to have tried to sabotage the election the other candidate wins right? Or if they have a new election the candidate that fucking cheated doesn't get to just run again does he? Because that would be some kind of insane bullshit.
Sorry, but real America sweats. We need someone sweaty to win. The sweater the better.I'm afraid Democrats are going to, once again, over-learn the lessons of their losing elections. It's pretty common when a party suffers a big loss, like in 2016, that they swing too far in the opposite direction to course correct and over-do it. Hillary very nearly won in 2016, so I'm nervous about making drastic changes to compensate for what was very nearly a win, and ending up with a candidate that's even further from where we want.
Basically, just because Hillary Clinton was physically incapable of sweating doesn't mean we should nominate the sweatiest man in America. Let's not be drastic.
I'm afraid Democrats are going to, once again, over-learn the lessons of their losing elections. It's pretty common when a party suffers a big loss, like in 2016, that they swing too far in the opposite direction to course correct and over-do it. Hillary very nearly won in 2016, so I'm nervous about making drastic changes to compensate for what was very nearly a win, and ending up with a candidate that's even further from where we want.
Basically, just because Hillary Clinton was physically incapable of sweating doesn't mean we should nominate the sweatiest man in America. Let's not be drastic.
Who is that? Which candidate is really far from her?I'm afraid Democrats are going to, once again, over-learn the lessons of their losing elections. It's pretty common when a party suffers a big loss, like in 2016, that they swing too far in the opposite direction to course correct and over-do it. Hillary very nearly won in 2016, so I'm nervous about making drastic changes to compensate for what was very nearly a win, and ending up with a candidate that's even further from where we want.
Basically, just because Hillary Clinton was physically incapable of sweating doesn't mean we should nominate the sweatiest man in America. Let's not be drastic.
No longer any reasonable doubt as to absentee fraud perpetrated by pro-Harris forces in #NC09 in both primary and general.
Now questions are: how widespread and who knew?