Yes, but the combination of a) bankruptcy b) massive outstanding private debt c) advanced degree. is not going to be very common.
These things can be true, but none of this really applies to the situation. Like, I think you missed the whole "permanent vacancy because there will never be as many employees as there are employers who want them" It's an unsolvable problem. Helping a small minority of people go to school again slightly helps with it, but its a drop of water in an ocean. And that unsolvable problem is at the core of why incomes are polarizing- the lower and upper middle class are growing while the actual middle class is shrinking.Most educational debt is public, and people with advanced degrees are drowning in debt everywhere.
i too love seeing environmental regulations rolled back but just not by a corrupt administrator
It's all over the news," Nancy Ruiz de Gamboa, the agency's associate commissioner for administration, wrote in an email to senior officials at the bureau.
In fact, Trump's tweet, which broke with decades of protocol in which the president waited until employment numbers were officially released to comment, did have an impact on the market: Stocks jumped, resulting in a flurry of activity inside BLS by officials who were trying to get a handle on the situation.
In another email, Eric Molina, the bureau's acting chief for the division of management systems, flagged Trump's tweet to William Wiatrowski, the commissioner of BLS. Molina said that while the tweet was "vague," it was interpreted to mean "that the Jobs Report was going in a positive direction."
Can all of this happening really be traced to Reagan being a dick, and Carter being a terrible president, or was this always going to happen?These things can be true, but none of this really applies to the situation. Like, I think you missed the whole "permanent vacancy because there will never be as many employees as there are employers who want them" It's an unsolvable problem. Helping a small minority of people go to school again slightly helps with it, but its a drop of water in an ocean. And that unsolvable problem is at the core of why incomes are polarizing- the lower and upper middle class are growing while the actual middle class is shrinking.
Now these critters come out the wood work to talk shyte after he's already resigned.
No, this was always going to happen. Same with globalization/loss of union power/etc. They just helped exacerbate the problem. (busting unions was good for the GOP politically)Can all of this happening really be traced to Reagan being a dick, and Carter being a terrible president, or was this always going to happen?
So, what solutions are there to ease the growing pains, in order from least pragmatic to most pragmatic?No, this was always going to happen. Same with globalization/loss of union power/etc. They just helped exacerbate the problem. (busting unions was good for the GOP politically)
These things can be true, but none of this really applies to the situation. Like, I think you missed the whole "permanent vacancy because there will never be as many employees as there are employers who want them" It's an unsolvable problem. Helping a small minority of people go to school again slightly helps with it, but its a drop of water in an ocean. And that unsolvable problem is at the core of why incomes are polarizing- the lower and upper middle class are growing while the actual middle class is shrinking.
WSJ article on Job-Hoppers from yesterday w/ a more positive spin on the CNBC stuff- https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-this-economy-quitters-are-winning-1530702001The job market is becoming more and more bifurcated and college is failing to properly prepare students for the level of specialization/expertise that companies are demanding (fairly or not). One thing that corporate America never realized was that unions helped to create and foster long-term employees because there was a level of trust and benefits associated with that commitment. Now employee and employer alike see each other as disposable, so employers want someone who can do the job on day 1 in case the employee decides to leave in a few years; why bother training someone for the next company they're going to work at when you can just hire someone who knows what to do?
Yes it is.There is absolutely a bunch of wasted potential, but even if you can harness that, you can't turn everyone into a rocket scientist or a lawyer or an accountant, etc.Upskilling the workforce is not an unsolvable problem. All it requires is a much more robust publicly subsidized post-secondary education system for people of all ages, not just the young. The amount of wasted human potential out there is staggering.
This is #4 of non mutual exits by my count. Price, Shulkin, Tillerson, and now Pruitt.Losing 3 cabinet secretaries in less than 2 years has to be some sort of record, right
WSJ article on Job-Hoppers from yesterday w/ a more positive spin on the CNBC stuff- https://www.wsj.com/articles/in-this-economy-quitters-are-winning-1530702001
The Strip CEO guy had a tweet related to that a day or two back- (paraphrasing) the true benefit to being in SV isn't the manual/tech skills, it's experience. It allows a startup access to poach a person who's actually managed a product launch at google similar to what you want to be setting up from scratch.
Now these critters come out the wood work to talk shyte after he's already resigned.
I did but I actually just looked it up and I mixed up two different redhead guys, will edit the first one.
I did but I actually just looked it up and I mixed up two different redhead guys, will edit the first one.
I stand correctedI think Curbelo actually was one of like 5 Republicans to call out Pruitt before.
As a resident of the Northeast Megalopolis, which generates 20% of the US' wealth and the place that has to make up for the deficit that "Middle America" creates...
I'm not going to spend the rest of my political life kow-towing to you. Fuck off.
Well, can we *really* say that her lawsuits didn't have a big impact? I don't know if it was The Thing that started #metoo or not, but it was certainly big news.Did... Gretchen just take responsibility for starting metoo here?
As a resident of the Northeast Megalopolis, which generates 20% of the US' wealth and the place that has to make up for the deficit that "Middle America" creates...
I'm not going to spend the rest of my political life kow-towing to you. Fuck off.
Don't celebrate too much. The next guy is just as bad when it comes to the environment.
As a resident of the Northeast Megalopolis, which generates 20% of the US' wealth and the place that has to make up for the deficit that "Middle America" creates...
I'm not going to spend the rest of my political life kow-towing to you. Fuck off.
I'm more annoyed of his patronizing tone. You should be reflecting on what a goddamn mistake you have made by voting for the wrinkled tangerine, not tut-tutting the opposition for simply getting mad. That is, if you're a decent person.He's a white guy who worked at Blizzard's Cali campus for years and years. Bannon and Miller? Also white dudes from Cali talking about "Middle America." Who demonized "elites" while working at Goldman Sachs. Just like this guy demonizes "tech fetishization" while being a goddamn game dev.
It's a gamergate guyI must have missed Trump's positive, welcoming vision for America. Whoever this is they're nauseatingly naive.
He's a white guy who worked at Blizzard's Cali campus for years and years. Bannon and Miller? Also white dudes from Cali talking about "Middle America." Who demonized "elites" while working at Goldman Sachs. Just like this guy demonizes "tech fetishization" while being a goddamn game dev.
No. One can definitely point out that allegations against Harvey Weinstein is what got the ball rolling.Well, can we *really* say that her lawsuits didn't have a big impact? I don't know if it was The Thing that started #metoo or not, but it was certainly big news.