Republicans *will* eat their own once the fight or flight instinct kicks in.
To continue my metaphorical posting - Trump is the plane carrying the republican soccer team straight into the Andes.
Republicans *will* eat their own once the fight or flight instinct kicks in.
Is there like a succinct timeline of events written out from the initial Ukraine call to now? I'm still trying to piece it all together, like the whistleblower's relationship to the Ukraine information getting out there.
It's been both a long and short week.
To continue my metaphorical posting - Trump is the plane carrying the republican soccer team straight into the Andes.
----The progressive consultant also said the campaign's internal politics were complicating efforts to broaden its appeal and forge alliances with outside grassroots groups.
"It's very confusing," the progressive consultant said of communications with the campaign. "I have talked to people that hear from all of them -- that hear from (senior adviser) Chuck Rocha, that hear from (senior adviser) Jeff Weaver and that hear from Faiz. But my understanding is that if you want to get to Bernie, it's not Faiz that you go through. It's Weaver or (deputy campaign manager) Ari Rabin-Havt."
For new groups only beginning to make sense of the progressive firmament, the process of sorting out the campaign hierarchy can be a turn-off -- especially when Warren's team has developed a reputation for proactively seeking out those less seasoned activists.
One of the senior Sanders aides conceded that the growing pains have been, at times, sharper than many expected. In 2016, the aide said, the absence at times of a coherent national operation meant that field staff had much more autonomy. The shakeup in New Hampshire, and lower level changes in Iowa, were largely instigated by internal arguments rooted in differing ideas about how to run a successful campaign without betraying the spirit of Sanders' first run.
Pence is still fucking hated. You likely get weirdness if it's President Pelosi.It's interesting. From a purely electoral point of view, there's an argument that the best thing for the Dems is an impeached Trump who'd only been censured by the Senate, because that's the maximum point of fracture in the Republican party (and frankly if given the evidence chain this as straightforward as it appears to be, this is what I think will happen, the Senate will impeach but censure: which will be amusing as all those originalists used to believe the constitution did not allow for unsure, and to be fair you could certainly read it that way.) Any normal politician even one stupid enough to be in this position would happily accept the censure and go about their business. Trump won't, he'll lash out at the Senate and the GOP.
Of course, that ignores the best thing for the country (and the world) is almost certainly Cheeto getting slung out on his arse and criminal proceedings being launched the minute his arse is out of the door.
Pretty useless thought exercise TBH.Bernie would be a horrifically terrible executive, part #4252t64
what's up with that paper? It looks like it is a 100 years old.
As if not having a Pledge of Allegiance would be a bad thing anyway.
Creepy, unsettling cult shit from the Cold War era like forcing rooms full of children to chant a blood oath in unison to some fabric has no reason to still exist.
I agree, it will take a lot more damage to make the GOP actually consider leaving their N°1 source of votersHe's gonna be impeached, no doubt, but if you think the GOP will convict, I'll trade pot with you because you're clearly smoking some killer shit.
Over under for new PoliEra OTs before articles of impeachment are filed?
The short and sweet of the Mueller probe is that it was never about getting Trump. Rosenstien appointed Mueller because if he didn't, the leadership at the FBI was going to tear itself apart going after Trump. Keeping the focus narrow and never letting Mueller actually dig deep enough to bring anyone down was the only way to keep McCabe from prosecuting Trump. Once McCabe was gone and Barr was brought in, Mueller submitted a report that Barr knew could only say "not guilty" or "not not guilty." It was to protect the FBI from itself and protect Trump from the FBI.
Here is a very good video I stumbled upon on YouTube of a lawyer breaking down this weeks events. It is very well done and worth a watch if you have the time.
They need to be reminded that this is impeachment, not festivus.That some on the left were whining about impeachment because they wanted an airing of grievances and not because they wanted a chance at a knockout punch is..... really awful.
Like, yes, the chances are low that they boot him. But you have to fucking try. Because in trying you damage the GOP.
Here is a very good video I stumbled upon on YouTube of a lawyer breaking down this weeks events. It is very well done and worth a watch if you have the time.
You inferred this was all the voters fault, but the only reason the majority weren't heard when it came to the executive branch is constitutional weirdness.Small comfort when we end up back here in 1, 4, or 8 (at best) years.
Maybe that's enough for you, but it isn't for me. The country showed itself for what it truly is, and simply punishing Trump and patting ourselves on the back for a job well done isn't going to wipe that away.
I'm glad he's also calling out the insanity of unelected personal lawyer Giuliani conducting foreign and military policy on behalf of the United States. For some reason, news analysts keep ignoring that outrage in the middle of everything else.
See what I wrote in my last post above.I wish content like this was the kind of stuff that went viral and completely broke the spell trump cultism has over... quite frankly many members of m extended family
What does it take?
See what I wrote in my last post above.
At this point it'd take removal of the cult leader, and then some intensive deprogramming.
I'm fascinated with the hypothetical concept of a secret vote to convict the president... It just doesn't seem like a thing that could actually happen. As much as I think we'd like the results of that vote, I don't like the idea. If the shoe was on the other foot, I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to have all of our senators publicly supporting Medicare for All because they know that's where the base is at, and then holding a private vote and siding with Republicans to kill it. It feels undemocratic to have senators voting in secret and not being accountable.
I realize it's not likely to happen, but I'm enjoying imagining the fallout from such a vote. I think every sitting Republican senator would get primaried from true believer Trumpers, and that most of them would be unelectable in the general. I keep waiting for that GOP Civil War to really pop off, and I think this would be the thing to do it.
Sorry for being purely analytical. I've watched my parents get more racist since I left the UK all the way up to my dad supporting Brexit. He loses his shit if anyone calls him racist but I can't forget the things he said to me about the Polish. Worst of all, he's an immigrant himself and still has an Irish passport.I just want my family back
And for them to engage in critical thinking and independence instead of continuing to have ridiculous shit fed to them
I feel like bills are a different ballgame than conviction votes but like as Auto said, the names of the Senators who voted Yea would leak anyways.I'm fascinated with the hypothetical concept of a secret vote to convict the president... It just doesn't seem like a thing that could actually happen. As much as I think we'd like the results of that vote, I don't like the idea. If the shoe was on the other foot, I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to have all of our senators publicly supporting Medicare for All because they know that's where the base is at, and then holding a private vote and siding with Republicans to kill it. It feels undemocratic to have senators voting in secret and not being accountable.
I realize it's not likely to happen, but I'm enjoying imagining the fallout from such a vote. I think every sitting Republican senator would get primaried from true believer Trumpers, and that most of them would be unelectable in the general. I keep waiting for that GOP Civil War to really pop off, and I think this would be the thing to do it.
Sorry for being purely analytical. I've watched my parents get more racist since I left the UK all the way up to my dad supporting Brexit. He loses his shit if anyone calls him racist but I can't forget the things he said to me about the Polish. Worst of all, he's an immigrant himself and still has an Irish passport.
My mum just leaves the room if politics ever come up. They visit me once a year for a month and so I don't broach the subject but if my dad does I can't let the untruths and nonsense go unchallenged.
Worst part is I know it's the media. They aren't being manipulated and fed bullshit about the US so they see what's going here and are concerned about what Trump is doing etc etc. I bet if they lived here they'd be Fox viewers and Trump supporters.
A secret vote would give them the chance to clear him without any record of who voted which way. I personally don't trust it for a second, espescially not if Mitch McConnell starts advocating for it.I like to think that republicans want to get out of Trumpism and a secret vote would be the golden ticket. This might be giving them too much credit, but I feel like republicans are stuck because if they go against the cult they pay for it as we have seen with the few defectors. Sure removing Trump means the party is going to take a hit, but at least they can distance themselves from this nightmare and quickly rebuild the party. Where if Trump is allowed another 5 years of this madness, I'm not sure the party is going to ever recover.
I would think if they want to clear him then they would leave it public to show the base they stood with him.A secret vote would give them the chance to clear him without any record of who voted which way. I personally don't trust it for a second, espescially not if Mitch McConnell starts advocating for it.
It all depends on which way the winds blow. I think, long term, having a record of who voted to clear Trump is going to be a problem for the people that did.I would think if they want to clear him then they would leave it public to show the base they stood with him.
Perhaps, but having it public casts a huge light on everyone in the room. If the public - even the Republicans - know where they stand when light is shone on the scandals, crimes, and corruptions, it holds everyone accountable - either for removing him or permitting wanton criminality in the office, on public record, for the world and history to see.I would think if they want to clear him then they would leave it public to show the base they stood with him.
That's true. There's no way it would stay secret for long.I feel like bills are a different ballgame than conviction votes but like as Auto said, the names of the Senators who voted Yea would leak anyways.
Ha! I hadn't thought of this as a possibility. I'm so naive that I was thinking that anonymity is the thing that would make them do the right thing... The evil shit they will do out in the open with their names attached probably should have clued me in.A secret vote would give them the chance to clear him without any record of who voted which way. I personally don't trust it for a second, espescially not if Mitch McConnell starts advocating for it.
Assuming the "in camera" secret vote is actually possible, I suspect that the prior vote to alter the rules could not be secret, so I doubt this tactic would even protect them from trump cultists or primary attackers all that much anyway. The vote to suspend the rules would just be the proxy. Maaaaybe they could get away with it if the rules vote was every Dem plus McConnell plus, say, Collins? I don't think that would fly, though. It would just make it worse for them with their base.I'm fascinated with the hypothetical concept of a secret vote to convict the president... It just doesn't seem like a thing that could actually happen. As much as I think we'd like the results of that vote, I don't like the idea. If the shoe was on the other foot, I can't imagine how frustrating it would be to have all of our senators publicly supporting Medicare for All because they know that's where the base is at, and then holding a private vote and siding with Republicans to kill it. It feels undemocratic to have senators voting in secret and not being accountable.
I realize it's not likely to happen, but I'm enjoying imagining the fallout from such a vote. I think every sitting Republican senator would get primaried from true believer Trumpers, and that most of them would be unelectable in the general. I keep waiting for that GOP Civil War to really pop off, and I think this would be the thing to do it.
Here is a very good video I stumbled upon on YouTube of a lawyer breaking down this weeks events. It is very well done and worth a watch if you have the time.
Great points and I too was being naive. Didn't think about the anonymity being a free pass to continue to be evil.That's true. There's no way it would stay secret for long.
Ha! I hadn't thought of this as a possibility. I'm so naive that I was thinking that anonymity is the thing that would make them do the right thing... The evil shit they will do out in the open with their names attached probably should have clued me in.
No problem, I'm going to have to watch more of his videos, really want to see what he puts together on impeachment like he teased in this video.Thanks for sharing that.
I thought it was cute he implied Barr would have to recluse himself, when everybody knows Barr won't.
As for Barr, I was wondering what the rules on recusing are. What happens if he refuses to recuse himself? Wouldn't him not doing so just make them look more guilty?