nobody had crowns before empoleonTop left has Empoleons crown on it, top right looks like Black Wargreymon (Digimon but still) and bottom reminds me of the genie legendary trio.
nobody had crowns before empoleonTop left has Empoleons crown on it, top right looks like Black Wargreymon (Digimon but still) and bottom reminds me of the genie legendary trio.
I don't know if you're aware of this, but people generally wear crowns on the top of their heads, not glued on the front of their face.
This is such a bad faith argument. If this was the only example of this then sure, but when there are the amount of examples as there is then it becomes quite obvious where these things have been taken from.
They're so....bizarre. Like the Avatar series' animal mash-ups, but without the creative intent (and directness), it's Frankenstein's Pokemon.
Like it's already a duck, why the beaver tail? (And then all the other extra superfluous appendages). Oh right, legally distinct.
Like, I legit think it's almost FUN to see how many existing Pokemon motifs Pals seem to exhibit. It's so weird... like unused Pokemon concept art. Of course Pokemon fans would notice it lol
That's because they're not "inspired" at all.This games creature design feels far too Bootleg to seem like it's inspired by Pokemon.
All right, this might actually be the true legit case of plagiarism
Whether by AI or by a human, there isn't much difference really for the person who's art is being stolen.And while I do think some of the creature designs are kitbashed, there's IS a distinction in doing it with A.I. that will just steal the art to a designer who deliberately chooses what part goes into the design and them creates it themselves.
View: https://x.com/iuckyhd/status/1749266070676922479?s=46
There may actually be a plagiarism case in this example.
Anyone else having fun looking at the Pals and working out what Pokémon they are a hodgepodge of?
Like, it's kind of the like Pokémon Infinite Fusion fan game except with 3D models.
Man, I am completely baffled at this game's popularity. Are PC Gamers really that hard up for a Pokemon clone or is this just edgelord meme territory?
There was actually quite a bit of variety for early FPS games in terms of themes and aesthetics. Catacombs 3D I believe came before Wolfenstein 3D and were fantasy D&D-style themed games. Blake Stone was pure outer space Sci-Fi. Hugo's House of Horrors got an FPS sequel for some reason so that is a more traditional horror. Ken's Labyrinth was just silly all around and featured no guns, just various projectiles. A terrible game like Isle of the Dead had a distinct zombies on island theme with cartoony graphics. Games coming after DOOM and using more advanced engines than a simple Wolf 3D style one, you had Hexen and Heretic which don't borrow the space marine vs demons theme, Strife was a Sci-Fi FPS with RPG elements, Duke Nukem 3D was about an action hero-like character (and of course featured a lot of adult content).The entire industry is built upon iterating on other people's ideas. Should first person shooters have stopped with marathon or wolfenstein 3d or whatever was actually first?
Hey guys, did you know that Final Fantasy has a spell called Fire, but Shin Megami Tensei has Agni? Pretty suspicious stuff if you ask me!
I mean obviously. Otherwise you'd have to make a whole new rig as well. At least this way you can grab the model, make a few changes so they aren't exactly the same, and copy the weights!
First one is yikes.I mean obviously. Otherwise you'd have to make a whole new rig as well. At least this way you can grab the model, make a few changes so they aren't exactly the same, and copy the weights!
I don't care for how he barely touches on the art and then just handwaves it away as 'parody'. Parody is not not just ripping off and copying style. These creatures don't look like 'parodies' of pokemon. They just look like pokemon.
View: https://twitter.com/byofrog/status/1749198773295743156
"they didn't invent spiky wolves!"
Clown show. Where will the goalposts move I wonder.
Not completely informed on how 3D model rigging works, but I'd imagine even changing proportions would mess it up?
First one is yikes.
Second one not so much.
Also hilarious how they are doing it because "animal abuse" like Pokemon doesn't have the exact same problem lmfao.
First one is yikes.
Second one not so much.
Also hilarious how they are doing it because "animal abuse" like Pokemon doesn't have the exact same problem lmfao.
View: https://twitter.com/byofrog/status/1749198773295743156
"they didn't invent spiky wolves!"
Clown show. Where will the goalposts move I wonder.
some names are about to be mysteriously absent from this topic 💅🏻
did you type this to cover your ill timed take on Fire and Agni?Copyright law and plaigarism norms should be guided by the public interest, first and foremost.
Generally there's a lot of room, even under the far too expansive western copyright system, for derivative works, parodies, works playing in the field, etc. Rowling got to copyright Harry Potter itself, but she didn't get to copyright the concept of a magical boarding school, even though there were many works that had magical schools that ripped off Hogwarts as much as not-Luxio up there rips off Luxio.
This is generally because the public interest is served by the publication of works that are similar to others, that can explore what they were exploring from a different angle or bring a fresh take on a familiar topic to the table. Protecting the ability of artists to be paid for their work is an important policy goals, but it is not the only policy goal. It has to be balanced against the public's interest in seeing derivative works published. Video games do this all the time: Doomlikes do not owe John Romero royalties; Hollow Knight owes its design lineage to Metroid and Castlevania, but does not need to license a Metroidvania IP. Superman got dibs on Superman, but many comics that would be plagiaristic by the standard Palworld is being held to here were still published.
You're welcome to disagree or not about the merits of Palworld as a game, but personally but I think it's fairly clear that if copyright law did forbid its creation, it would be a failure of copyright policy. And it should be clear that whatever minuscule harm Nintendo may suffer from a speculative violation of their copyright is tiny compared to the harm caused by preventing derivative products from coming to market.
Gaming Era really showed its whole ass with this one. Wonder where the goalposts will move now.some names are about to be mysteriously absent from this topic 💅🏻
Well. These model rips are almost entirely functioning ready to use models, with the exception of missing rig and ik controls. I am not a rigger, so my knowledge is limited in that sense, but these things would need to be created as they're not exported into a final game build.
You can make certain adjustments to the proportions, so as long as they fit the skeleton, you can copy the weights over and make small adjustments.
View: https://twitter.com/byofrog/status/1749198773295743156
"they didn't invent spiky wolves!"
Clown show. Where will the goalposts move I wonder.
Hey now, the people desperately trying to convince us that this game wasn't actually ripping off Pokemon designs never had a leg to stand on in the first place.Gaming Era really showed its whole ass with this one. Wonder where the goalposts will move now.
Just like with people defending generative AI art here in Era it's made engaging with this topic extremely frustrating and I want to give mad respect to the people fighting the good fight.Gaming Era really showed its whole ass with this one. Wonder where the goalposts will move now.
Me: Direhowl is a Lycanroc. You can literally just look at it and tell.
Folks: No it's not, it's extremely different! Nintendo doesn't own spiky wolves!
Direhowl: Me and Lycanroc literally share the same base modeling. 👀
my thing is that palmon and freedom planet arent even remotely on the same level to be compared like thisNever played the sequel (Didn't even know there was one actually)
But my point with that post is that both games were clearly inspired by their counterpart . Plenty of the characters are Donuts, but being a Donut is how many characters start off and then further enhanced with the creators own identity. Didn't you see my Guardians of the Globe post? Omni-Man is basically what if Goku didn't bump his head ad even Goku and Omniman themsleves share quite a bit from the Superman mythos.
Nothing exist in a vacuum. I wasn't trying to actually lambast the game although with who I was responding too I can see how you could take it that way) so I apologize. But my point was that it's ok to take ideas from stuff we like, which Palworld and Freedom Planet did.
Palworld hasn't gone far enough and comes across as generic and lazy which I've stood by since the start.
View: https://twitter.com/byofrog/status/1749198773295743156
"they didn't invent spiky wolves!"
Clown show. Where will the goalposts move I wonder.
Copyright law and plaigarism norms should be guided by the public interest, first and foremost.
Generally there's a lot of room, even under the far too expansive western copyright system, for derivative works, parodies, works playing in the field, etc. Rowling got to copyright Harry Potter itself, but she didn't get to copyright the concept of a magical boarding school, even though there were many works that had magical schools that ripped off Hogwarts as much as not-Luxio up there rips off Luxio.
This is generally because the public interest is served by the publication of works that are similar to others, that can explore what they were exploring from a different angle or bring a fresh take on a familiar topic to the table. Protecting the ability of artists to be paid for their work is an important policy goals, but it is not the only policy goal. It has to be balanced against the public's interest in seeing derivative works published. Video games do this all the time: Doomlikes do not owe John Romero royalties; Hollow Knight owes its design lineage to Metroid and Castlevania, but does not need to license a Metroidvania IP. Superman got dibs on Superman, but many comics that would be plagiaristic by the standard Palworld is being held to here were still published.
You're welcome to disagree or not about the merits of Palworld as a game, but personally but I think it's fairly clear that if copyright law did forbid its creation, it would be a failure of copyright policy. And it should be clear that whatever minuscule harm Nintendo may suffer from a speculative violation of their copyright is tiny compared to the harm caused by preventing derivative products from coming to market.