Or the magic spell that gave him powers wasn't broken so he kept the powers.I'm saying to explain why, even though he is now free from Agatha's mind control and HexView, he still as Speed powers
Or the magic spell that gave him powers wasn't broken so he kept the powers.I'm saying to explain why, even though he is now free from Agatha's mind control and HexView, he still as Speed powers
Aaw, I would love to see Monica and the twin adventure together. Monica did deliver one of them.4. When being asked if there were any theories that he wished they did, he talked about how everyone thought EVERYONE on the show was Mephisto, even Senior Scratchy. But they did have a plan for the rabbit: in a deleted scene, the kids along with Ralph and Monica meet up in the basement and want to capture the Darkhold, but right before they do, the rabbit jumps in front of them and would transform. It seems the rabbit was her familiar. (Timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=7528)
- Some random person got a hold of his cell no. and texted him "Didn't you learn from The Mandarin in Iron Man 3?" But he said that was his favorite part of that movie!
- To those disappointed there's no multiverse/FoX-Men introduced here, he said that they're coming, so your patience will be rewarded.
got to be incursion, right? Fox verse can be like Ultimate Universe and got destroyedThis is creepy as fuck. What is wrong with people?
Hell, maybe we'll get a "real Mandarin" moment with Evan Peters. A man can hope.
- Some random person got a hold of his cell no. and texted him "Didn't you learn from The Mandarin in Iron Man 3?" But he said that was his favorite part of that movie!
This is exactly what I think. Maybe I'm just being ignorant but the writing in this and throughout the MCU makes it seem to me as long as intentions are good and no harm was intended, they can hold themselves accountable even if thousands of people are hurt. I don't need to see Wanda in jail or anything like that, but the writing should at least imply it's bad that she's getting off without even a slap on the wrist.I actually being need her to suffer consequences, but I need the narrative of the show to make it clear she *deserves* them.
So the director of WandaVision, Matt Shakman, was on FatMan Beyond with Kevin Smith and Marc Bernardin. He gave plenty of insight into the show. It's a LONG interview. https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8
But a few notable things he said:
1. They never intended for the Aerospace engineer to be a thing. It was part of the reshoots later, as an explanation for Monica's plan to get back into the hex (timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=4050).
2. So, about Fietro (timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=7228):
- Some random person got a hold of his cell no. and texted him "Didn't you learn from The Mandarin in Iron Man 3?" But he said that was his favorite part of that movie!
- He said he loves playing around with expectations/turning things around on the audience. He thinks it's enjoyable.
- To those disappointed there's no multiverse/FoX-Men introduced here, he said that they're coming, so your patience will be rewarded.
- They could've had Aaron Taylor-Johnson come back, but they already had one person Wanda loved come back (Vision), so they decided to explore how you can bargain with yourself (like in the five stages of grief) to believe this person who isn't really your brother IS your brother. She wants him back so badly (and she's in such denial) that she'll just accept this random stranger in that role.
- It's also meta-commentary on sitcoms and how people get recast. He's like the second Darren on Bewitched, Becky on Roseanne, or Aunt Viv on Fresh Prince.
- They loved the opportunity to work with Evan Peters.
3. Kevin picked up on how abrupt Darcy/Kat Dennings part was in the last episode, thinking it might've been a scheduling conflict. Matt didn't directly answer why she was barely in the ep., but it looked like he was starting to say "COVID" while Kevin was still speaking. Sounds like they couldn't get her back to shoot more. (Timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=7492)
4. When being asked if there were any theories that he wished they did, he talked about how everyone thought EVERYONE on the show was Mephisto, even Senior Scratchy. But they did have a plan for the rabbit: in a deleted scene, the kids along with Ralph and Monica meet up in the basement and want to capture the Darkhold, but right before they do, the rabbit jumps in front of them and would transform. It seems the rabbit was her familiar. (Timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=7528)
Calling it a "dick joke payoff" is a bit silly. There was no payoff, he was simply some dude. It is okay for story beats to do that.Because it was a multi-episode mystery that existed specifically to make people think one thing but it ended up being a literal dick joke (and then we don't even see him again and the character is thrown to the side). Him actually being Pietro from the Fox universe is a thousand times more interesting.
Marvel put him in the series to play Pietro and gave him super speed (which was never actually explained so I guess Agatha can just give people legit super powers with a necklace).
If you enjoyed the dick joke payoff, that's fine. But it's a little disingenuous to say things outside of the story itself is "the only reason" why people had expectations when that was the literal reason he was put into the show at all.
Not as big as the big fat L it took when they never had a Snap after Infinity War.
Calling it a "dick joke payoff" is a bit silly. There was no payoff, he was simply some dude. It is okay for story beats to do that.
I get it, though, I was hoping for some cross universe shenanigans. We're the kind of nerds who like that shit though, so it was always going to be a bit disappointing for us.
You could be right, but I didn't take it that way.I agree that it is a demonstration of her natural ability since she is said to be more powerful than the Sorcerer Supreme, and that same Doctor Strange astral projection scene was used to show how advanced and clever he was to be thinking outside the box to excel in his studies, but I think that it lines up with how it's essentially her subconscious that was responsible for operating the "machinery" of the Hex in the background while she was mostly unaware of her direct involvement, except when she'd want something to change. Her subconscious has not only tapped into her latent ability, but the parallels with a "Phoenix Force"-like powerful entity inside of her in the "Scarlet Witch" means that it already threatens to be a power and persona that is out of her control, and I think that it has already begun to manifest in her own psychotic break and psychosis from this event. At this point, it's not so much like a malevolent "dark side" within Wanda, but given that it seems her subconscious understands her power far more than she does, I could see that a further split between her consciousness and subconsciousness where her subconscious is studying powerful dark magics and both aspects of her personality (her split subconscious and her inherited magic persona) may increasingly grow out of her control.
I think other heroes not suggesting she get help lines up with Monica or anyone else not suggesting she needed help since Monica only saw the grief and she only seems to have understood it as her reaction to all her trauma, not as much about what she did and didn't know. She probably thought the end of the Hex would be the end of it. Maybe the closest anyone that is on her side who would understand the extent of her mental state is Vision, but even he didn't have the full picture. Agatha was the only one who probably intimately understood was Wanda did and was going through and she only cared insofar as it helped her to understand Wanda's power and therefore make herself more power, not because she cared to help her.
The way you word it, "at least evil person X did this" made it sound like you were hand waving away their actions.
WE the audience know that Vision is not a robot because we watched other MCU content. And for that WE sympathize for Wanda's situation. We also know that no rationale gov agency is going to surrender a WMD to a civilian or honor the will of an AI.That is a problem- Vision is not a robot. He had nothing to do with anything Wanda did to the town. The man came online and helped take down Ultron. Having his will violated is how the people repay him? It like when people cheer soilder going to war, then do jack shit for them or their family when they come back either broken or in a box.
No what is cliche is wrapping everything up in a perfect moral bow like MCU has done in past films. Letting a morally dubious Wanda go at the end is the least cliche thing they could have done.
Thematically, there's no need for anyone to be physically capable of taking Wanda into custody. The problem is that the characters who should be noting the continued injustice and ongoing mental health emergency are instead validating someone who needs help, not validation. It's just really shitty characterization.Actually, the ending is realistic. Wanda's power level is off the charts at the end. There was nobody in Westview Monica or SWORD that could force Wanda into custody. Wanda surrendering herself into yet another government custody at this point in her life is not happening. You can't get justice or help from the very organization that desecrated Vision and wants Wanda dead.
Nah, Monica saw Wanda hold 3000 people hostage, including Monica herself, and torture them. I'm sure Cap, in Monica's shoes, would have said more than "thank you for your sacrifice, good luck ". He would have actually put forth an effort to get her the help she needs. Because that's his characterization. What is Monica's characterization? She's ultimately useless in this story.Monica is no different than Rogers when he first learns of Wanda and Pietro. He saw in both of them two messed up people who were fighting a war because that is all they have know. She became an Avenger because someone believed in her and treated her like a person.
again, there's nothing wrong with Wanda deciding to flee. That fits her characterization. What's problematic is how the people around her are reacting to the situation.USA actions since Civil War is to treat powered people like her, Hawkeye, Antman, and Falcon criminals. The world Wanda lives in changed- there are no good guys to help her. There are no good guys that going to give her a just trial or mental help. Any reasonable person would chose to fight back or run away to hide from that.
The Darkhold was brought up when people were speculating the book in Episode 7 but a number of people hand-waved it off trying to figure out how it'd reconcile with its appearance in Agents of SHIELD.
I'm not sure why they didn't reference the snap but did acknowledge Thanos attacking Earth.
AOS has been non-canon ever since Infinity War. I just consider it being part of its own universe, kinda like the Netflix stuff.The Darkhold was brought up when people were speculating the book in Episode 7 but a number of people hand-waved it off trying to figure out how it'd reconcile with its appearance in Agents of SHIELD.
The canonicity of Agents of SHIELD took a pretty fat L with this last ep. 😂
LOL
Well the funny thing is... There were no witches in Salem. So to me it does the opposite, says "And we know you had theories she's a magic user too, she isn't"
AOS has been non-canon ever since Infinity War. I just consider it being part of its own universe, kinda like the Netflix stuff.
It also seems that the engineer's tease was 100% intended, but was getting worried when people suddenly expected Reed Richard to show up. A lot was left on the cutting room floor, so it may have originally had a bigger pay-off.
Just wanted to quote this because it was such a great interview that discussed so many things that have come up in this thread. SonofDonCD wrote out some of the things in the ggreat post below, but there was a lot more, too.
Also really showed how Shakman really was the right person for the job, with his background and passion.
interview starts at 35:10
4. When being asked if there were any theories that he wished they did, he talked about how everyone thought EVERYONE on the show was Mephisto, even Senior Scratchy. But they did have a plan for the rabbit: in a deleted scene, the kids along with Ralph and Monica meet up in the basement and want to capture the Darkhold, but right before they do, the rabbit jumps in front of them and would transform. It seems the rabbit was her familiar. (Timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=7528)
Apparently they did shoot the scene too, just never finish the visual effects. I really want to see it too, if not to have more Darcy scenes. Hopefully we see a bit of it in the making of wandavision next week
Just wanted to quote this because it was such a great interview that discussed so many things that have come up in this thread. SonofDonCD wrote out some of the things in the ggreat post below, but there was a lot more, too.
Also really showed how Shakman really was the right person for the job, with his background and passion.
interview starts at 35:10
The cliffhanger is because Pietro looks completely different. "They recast Pietro!?" Notice that Darcy doesn't then continue "his energy signature is out of this world!" or something. Notice that there's nothing in the script that even hint there's a multiverse shenanigans going on. Notice that the story never raises the question of "but who is he actually is" and simply leans heavily to "isn't it super weird and scary that Pietro looks completely different?" And then after the episode, nobody cares to bring him up again. I feel calling it a "multi-episode mystery" is a huge stretch.
And still, it's unrelated to the story? I understand if you don't like the decision. I personally think that the stunt casting is rather pointless. But nothing in the story, script and framing we get would be out of place even if they casted Zac Efron or Tyler Hoechlin instead of Evan Peters.
I'm not sure why they didn't reference the snap but did acknowledge Thanos attacking Earth.
Do you think that Agatha, in her own weird way, was somehow helpful to Wanda?
Absolutely. Agatha, technically, is more on the villainous end of the spectrum, but she actually is the chief instigator of Wanda's healing. And there is a desire to connect with Wanda and to mentor her and to learn from her. Agatha's damage is so severe, and she has been alone for so long, and all of that hurt has calcified. The question of, can she be pulled back from this very selfish, power-hungry place? I would argue she totally could, given the right story line. In the writers' room, one of the things we kept saying is, Agatha is not wrong in her analysis of Wanda being in denial. She's being kind of harsh with it. She could go back and get a degree and maybe be gentle. But she fast-tracks what is necessary for Wanda in her journey.
Was it a certainty that you'd be able to get Evan Peters, who was Quicksilver in the "X-Men" movies, to play the show's fake Pietro?
It was an enormous question mark for a very long time. And it took a while to figure out if it would be possible. It was late that it was finally confirmed that we could do it. But we were writing for it. Evan is such a chameleon in that way, that could play an amalgamation of Uncle Jesse [from "Full House"], Nick [from "Family Ties"] and Joey from "Friends." He could play those layers.
Did you have a backup plan if you couldn't get him?
The ground is often shifting, and sometimes that's how the amazing things occur. There are a couple of scenes that I wrote that I'm like, "This is genius!" And then it was like, "No, you can't have that toy." You find a different toy that suits your show better. But there wasn't a Plan B on that. There were just very, very intense hopes and dreams, and they were met.
A speech from Vision in Episode 8 — and particularly his quote, "What is grief, if not love persevering?" — really caught on with viewers. Did it land as powerfully for you when that episode was being written?
In the writers' room, we had intense conversations about grief and loss. We had a grief counselor come and speak to us. My initial pitch, the structure of the show was mapped to the stages of grief. I did not know that that line would be a sensation, but it did feel at the time that it was the perfect distillation of the show. Laura Donney wrote an extraordinary episode, and as we were moving toward production on the scene, Paul was really hungering for, what's the thing that Vision can say that will bring her comfort? He wanted a line that, in a very Vision way, would perfectly encapsulate a definition of grief, like in "Age of Ultron," how he says, "A thing isn't beautiful because it lasts."
So I came up with a line that was something along the lines of, "What is grief but love surviving?" We agreed that wasn't quite it and we were turning it over and trying to figure it out. My incredibly talented assistant, Laura Monti, came up with the word "persevering." We all believe that the line was born of the enormous amount of collaboration and unity on the show. So many talented women, specifically, came up with it.
Do you think Wanda got the fate she deserved in the show's conclusion?
I don't know if she got what she deserved. She got to say goodbye on her own terms. That's what's important to me. Everything that she's been through has been forced upon her, and things have been wrenched from her. It's all been in this frenzied, stakes-of-the-universe way. She has to make really big decisions with no time for processing. This goodbye moment is her choice and she got to do it in her own way. That is what she needed to process everything she's been through and reach acceptance.
What did the final scene of the series mean to you?
[Pauses, then laughs.] There's not a whole lot that I can say. What I can say is, I love the duality of it. I love the real Wanda, sitting on her porch, making a cup of tea, doing her ruminating and reflecting. And the super-lady in the back room who is astral-projecting and functioning at a level that we have yet to understand. I love that.
Are there plans for a second season of "WandaVision"?
That is one of the things that I super can't talk about. I will just reiterate what [the Marvel Studios president] Kevin Feige says: We set out to make a very complete and satisfying series. But with an entity like the M.C.U., you never know.
Right now, I see it a bit like Star Wars Legends: as a whole they're non-canon, but the MCU proper can pick and choose the parts they'd like to preserve or re-introduce. This can be in a wholly different form, like the Darkhold, or perhaps more directly, for instance if any of the Netflix characters show up in future movies.dubious canonicity of the non-Marvel Studios projects is going to be a recurring thing until they finally take a definitive stance on it. And it really only comes down to AoS and the Netflix shows, aka the only things people are actually really loud about preserving (sorry Runaways fans).
They don't want to preserve it, they just will not piss of that loud fanbase. They however don't care about writing things that overlap.The dubious canonicity of the non-Marvel Studios projects is going to be a recurring thing until they finally take a definitive stance on it. And it really only comes down to AoS and the Netflix shows, aka the only things people are actually really loud about preserving (sorry Runaways fans).
2. So, about Fietro (timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=7228):
- Some random person got a hold of his cell no. and texted him "Didn't you learn from The Mandarin in Iron Man 3?" But he said that was his favorite part of that movie!
- He said he loves playing around with expectations/turning things around on the audience. He thinks it's enjoyable.
- To those disappointed there's no multiverse/FoX-Men introduced here, he said that they're coming, so your patience will be rewarded.
- They could've had Aaron Taylor-Johnson come back, but they already had one person Wanda loved come back (Vision), so they decided to explore how you can bargain with yourself (like in the five stages of grief) to believe this person who isn't really your brother IS your brother. She wants him back so badly (and she's in such denial) that she'll just accept this random stranger in that role.
- It's also meta-commentary on sitcoms and how people get recast. He's like the second Darren on Bewitched, Becky on Roseanne, or Aunt Viv on Fresh Prince.
- They loved the opportunity to work with Evan Peters.
If it was meant to be a truly random person, why Peters with all his X-men history to the audience, hehe.
Ben Kingsley should had played the part, lol.
So the director of WandaVision, Matt Shakman, was on FatMan Beyond with Kevin Smith and Marc Bernardin. He gave plenty of insight into the show. It's a LONG interview. https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8
But a few notable things he said:
1. They never intended for the Aerospace engineer to be a thing. It was part of the reshoots later, as an explanation for Monica's plan to get back into the hex (timestamp here - https://youtu.be/qFxn1q-KqW8?t=4050).
If it was meant to be a truly random person, why Peters with all his X-men history to the audience, hehe.
Ben Kingsley should had played the part, lol.
Ted McGinnley looking over Darcy's shoulder would have been hilarious.If it was meant to be a truly random person, why Peters with all his X-men history to the audience, hehe.
Ben Kingsley should had played the part, lol.
Oh. The issue isn't that they kept Infinity War's ending a secret, because everyone who read the comics and had an ounce of dramatic sense knew that the movie would end with Thanos getting all of the stones, snapping and killing half of all life in the universe. It's that Endgame's plot, including the time skip was a state secret, that no one knew about, and thus it was hard to justify incorporating the Snap into things, because they had to run with the assumption that like the comics, how the heroes stopped and undid Thanos's actions would have been immediate.From my understanding, Marvel Studios kept the ending of Infinity War secret from Marvel Television, so they didn't know it was coming until the movie was out.
It was never a tease, it was just a shorthand for why Monica was able to a get a billion dollar experimental spacecraft delivered on command in three days.This is the one thats weird to me, the other three are understandable. Why set this up with no payoff? During dailies I presume they had to see how this sounded. Maybe add a single line about your moms friends who don't agree with Haywards changes, or have the engineer also be a skrull. I get that they thought it was a tease that let to Photon's creation, but weird to not think they might also be teasing the unnamed person to be a future plot beat.
Damn, that would had been dope, lol.
Or Drake from State Farm.
Interesting enough I think the only stuff that will, ultimately, end up in that "technically canon because it hasn't been contradicted" space is the obscure shows - Cloak and Dagger, Runaways, Helstrom. Because I doubt they're bringing in Satana any time soon, y'know?
The real issue, which I suspect the writers didn't see coming, was that A) the fans were really hoping that SWORD would be setting up Fantastic Four, and B) the fans would spend a ton of time going "is this a hint? is that a hint?" each week.It was never a tease, it was just a shorthand for why Monica was able to a get a billion dollar experimental spacecraft delivered on command in three days.
I was wondering if I should check it out since it's on D+ in Canada. Is it an enjoyable standalone one season show that's cancelled?Lol, I would love it if they canonized Helstrom, I loved that show.
That's 100% not happening, though.