I mean the OP makes it pretty clear, 97 is a rare score and they want to talk about that. Why is this an issue? Everything doesn't have to be a conspiracy.
96 is a rare score. So is 95. And 94.... do you see where I'm going with this?
The OP's very specific selection of a 97 MC score is puzzling because it's so arbitrary. I don't think it's unreasonable to ask why he chose 97 and the reasoning given in the OP isn't a sufficient explanation.
He's entitled to ignore my question. But I'm also entitled to ask it. Why do you care so much that another poster is curious and asking about the OP's reasoning behind a thread premise?
There has been countless thread on a similar topic (notably on what is Era's GOTG), this is a different thread with a different goal. It's not about which game Era prefers overall, but rather which games are both loved by the critics and this place
Errrrr, there are lots of threads on Era about different things. That's just stating the obvious. I'm not sure what that has to do with the question I'm asking the OP.
I'm curious why the OP is interested in Era's review of games that score above a particularly arbitrarily chosen MC score range. I'm wondering why he chose a score of 97? It's weirdly specific and the OP doesn't really give enough explanation. So If I'm curious and the OP hasn't included the detail in his post, I will ask him the question... I'm not seeing what's wrong with asking the OP a question?
I thought this was a discussion forum?
Was there something wrong with my post? I'm curious why you settled on a MC score of 97. It's oddly specific. Did you have a reason behind it?