Ok, this is the kind of overreaction I meant on stuff like this:
Ok, this is the kind of overreaction I meant on stuff like this:
I don't, just stumbled upon this on twitter and thought it fit the thread due to how crazy it wasIt's one random person out of billions in the Internet. You could probably find a tweet to support any and every position. Why do you care so much what that one person thinks?
I don't really feel like it's adding anything new to the discussion, yet sets us up for another page of the old man romanticising sex with teens and demanding people adhere to his outdated and dangerous views.I don't, just stumbled upon this on twitter and thought it fit the thread due to how crazy it was
True but I meant to add that this is the stuff I was baffled by , not by what LL guy is sayingI don't really feel like it's adding anything new to the discussion, yet sets us up for another page of the old man romanticising sex with teens and demanding people adhere to his outdated and dangerous views.
Sure, but what's the tweet adding to that that's not already been covered in the existing discussion?True but I meant to add that this is the stuff I was baffled by , not by what LL guy is saying
I guess nothing but used as an example of the overreactionSure, but what's the tweet adding to that that's not already been covered in the existing discussion?
The "rule" I was taught growing up was half of your current age + seven being the minimum. I.E. If you're 30 divided in half is 15 + 7 = 22 is the minimum age generally society should not look at you funny. 50 is 25 + 7, etc. etc.
EDIT: Looks like multiple people have already posted this.
True but I meant to add that this is the stuff I was baffled by , not by what LL guy is saying
I'm sure Mrs Decitrig isn't the only one who would be offended by this ridiculous equation.
—As far as you've posted before she's in her 70s and you're in your 60s so I fail to see, outside of this repeat need to make everything about you, how it's applicable.
I know. I'm not really interested in these tiny age gaps between adults, which are for some reason so emotive for some. What really interests me is the topic of ageism, particularly the assumption that older people have some weird ulterior motive for seeking a younger partner, other than the obvious ones such as youth and vigour.
It isn't ageism you fucking dullard because the issue isn't the age, it's the inherent things that come as a consequence of age when met against someone who's only just turned an adult. It's been repeated ad nauseam that the dynamic doesn't necessitate abuse, but is more susceptible to it. The issue isn't someone disliking the idea of older people finding younger people attractive.
You've gone for homophobia, then misogyny, then racism, now ageism. All thrown at people as being the actual reason they dislike people 40+ chasing teenagers for relationships.
This tactic of reframing the argument to something completely different is tired. Your perspective and views on things are dangerous. Your compulsion to spend ten pages demanding no one find the dynamic suspicious at all, ever, is fucking suspect. Not your thought that young people can be attractive.
I'm not sure, but I'm not going to stop countering the same arguments and tactics you've been repeating for pages just because you put them on a new page. You promote a dangerous mindset and one that I really don't want to see presented without a counter - especially without some wider context of your winding rambles and bizarre equivalences.I've been ignoring this person for some time. At what point does repeatedly attacking another poster with repetitive content become bannable?
I don't care for one. You've long since proven you're not arguing in good faith. As was said to you half the thread ago, the hilarious thing is that you believe you're fooling anyone.
I don't care for one. You've long since proven you're not arguing in good faith. As was said to you half the thread ago, the hilarious thing is that you believe you're fooling anyone.
I don't. Your constant reframing of the concern is as transparent as everything else.
I don't. Your constant reframing of the concern is as transparent as everything else.
...Go on, give it a go. Try to encapsulate what problems you think might exist in a relationship like mine.
Your constant reframing of the concern is as transparent as everything else.
I'm not gaslighting, but continue to throw these terms around.
I have a genuine concern for young people that are favoured by much older people looking to be in serious relationships. All I've said is that I'll side-eye it when I see it and remain aware and sceptical. If that bothers you, it bothers you.
As said before I'm glad you've had positive experiences but you're taking a general concern and cracking your back in applying it to yourself, when it already accounts for such relationships working out.
As far as you've posted before she's in her 70s and you're in your 60s so I fail to see, outside of this repeat need to make everything about you, how it's applicable.
And so you're back to spamming. I really wish I hadn't given you a chance. It's just not worth my time to try to engage. There's nothing of substance to engage with, just ever more bizarre accusations.
I've dated on both extreme ends of the age spectrum. Like any relationship, if you let outsiders' opinions affect how you're supposed to feel, you're doing a disservice to yourself and the person you're dating.
The "rule" I was taught growing up was half of your current age + seven being the minimum. I.E. If you're 30 divided in half is 15 + 7 = 22 is the minimum age generally society should not look at you funny. 50 is 25 + 7, etc. etc.
EDIT: Looks like multiple people have already posted this.