If they aren't going to ban them outright, people who eat at chik fil a should get a tag so the actual good people here can just put the trash people on auto ignore.
No one is stopping you from ignoring people. You see it, just tag it
If they aren't going to ban them outright, people who eat at chik fil a should get a tag so the actual good people here can just put the trash people on auto ignore.
Why shouldn't that apply to you as well if you shop at Target, Amazon, Walmart, Home Depot, Macy's, or at any of the companies on this list of companies that donate or are in partnership with The Salvation Army? Chick-fil-A's donations aren't any different from those companies' donations or association.
It has been nearly five years since Chick-fil-A chairman and CEO Dan Cathy's comment that the company was "guilty as charged" of opposing same-sex marriage brought the company's long history of anti-LGBTQ activism to the nation's attention.
At that time, the company launched a very small charm offensive, issuing a statement that the company will "treat every person with honor, dignity and respect-regardless of their beliefs, race, creed, sexual orientation and gender." (Chick-fil-A did not back this up with any LGBTQ-inclusive non-discrimination policy. )
For example, the Chick-fil-A Foundation gave more than $1 million in 2015 (nearly one-sixth of its total grants) to the the Fellowship of Christian Athletes. The religious organization, which seeks to utilize athletes and coaches to spread Christian teachings, imparts a strongly anti-LGBTQ message. Staff and volunteers with the organization have been required to adhere to a strict "sexual purity" policy, prohibiting any "homosexual acts," even for married couples. The group takes the view that, "The Bible is clear in teaching on sexual sin including sex outside of marriage and homosexual acts. Neither heterosexual sex outside of marriage nor any homosexual act constitute an alternative lifestyle acceptable to God."
Bigotry aside, I never understood the hype with Chick Fil A. We had them in Arkansas since the late 90s and it didn't seem to blow up in popularity ironically until around the whole gay marriage thing when the mega churches basically started promoting them.
The food is just okay to me. If there's a half empty McDonalds next to a super busy Chick Fil A - I'm probably getting a Big Mac.
I feel that the distinction is meaningless when the end result is the same: your money's going to organizations that harm human rights. Just because you're clearing some arbitrary standard that you set for yourself, it doesn't mean that your money isn't ultimately doing just as much to harm human rights as some other person's money. Nor should it mean that anyone who's not clearing the same standard is, without exception, "a piece of trash". Because otherwise, many millions of otherwise decent people, many of whom are themselves oppressed minorities, would also qualify as "pieces of trash".
Whataboutism needs to be laser focused in order to be effective. Which other company does so much to proudly embrace how anti-LGBT they are?
There are companies that give money to both sides of the aisle, and thus have given to shitty people and causes. Chick Fil A basically only wants to make sure that their anti-LGBT cause gets oxygen. That is the difference.
But that's not really "expensive" in comparison to other fast food places. Wendy's is just if not more expensive, same goes for McDonald's and Popeyes. A Big Mac is like $4.50-$5.00 and the Popeyes chicken sandwich is $5
I feel that the distinction is meaningless when the end result is the same: your money's going to organizations that harm human rights. Just because you're clearing some arbitrary standard that you set for yourself, it doesn't mean that your money isn't ultimately doing just as much to harm human rights as some other person's money. Nor should it mean that anyone who's not clearing the same standard is, without exception, "a piece of trash". Because otherwise, many millions of otherwise decent people, many of whom are themselves oppressed minorities, would also qualify as "pieces of trash".
If we're going to be basing conclusions as to whether someone is irredeemable trash on this one issue alone, it's fair game to question whether the tangible result of any one person's decision to consume from Chick-fil-A is any different from someone else's decision to consume from Target, Apple, Amazon, etc.
Exactly. When are the mods going to make good on their promises to the queer Era community and back up that shit up with actions. We still haven't seen a response to last weeks drama. People aren't feeling anymore welcome and I'm still seeing these basic ass threads by straight people who have no issues supporting this trash company.
Era has an excellent ignore feature, which im about to make use of..
Make a stand. These threads and posters should go to the old place.
That doesn't address the argument. But if you'd prefer to go through life thinking people are irredeemable trash for the fast food they consume, and that that's the only thing you need to know about them to be sure that they are bad people, then yeah, sure, go ahead. That's a rather sad life to lead, in my opinion, but it's your prerogative.This is just "nobody is perfect, we can't judge anyone" dressed up to make people feel better. We're comparing a company that scored a 0 on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation's Corporate Equality Index to companies that have scored 100. While that is only one standard, and we're only talking about diversity and LGBT rights, it gives you an idea of what we're talking about without covering our eyes and ears and saying "NO ETHICAL BLAH BLAH."
That doesn't address the argument. But if you'd prefer to go through life thinking people are irredeemable trash for the fast food they consume, and that that's the only thing you need to know about them to be sure that they are bad people, then yeah, sure, go ahead. That's a rather sad life to lead, in my opinion, but it's your prerogative.
I feel like every week here a thread pops up about chick fil a so people could praise despite it's obvious stances
You people aren't slick lmao
Tastes really good and the level of service they provide is off the charts (for a fast food place).
It is nice getting your food from someone that doesn't hate their job and actually gives a fuck.
Tastes really good and the level of service they provide is off the charts (for a fast food place).
It is nice getting your food from someone that doesn't hate their job and actually gives a fuck.
This is my favorite new phrase. All these douchebags in this thread praising Chik-Fil-A aren't slick.
My first boyfriend, who I'm still good friends with, was sent to a conversion camp by his parents. It was a pretty damn traumatic experience for him. Chick-Fil-A's donations go towards those programs. You seriously want to sit here and tell queer people it's not a big deal, praise this trash company, or play a game of whataboutism?
Bitch, fucking please. Someone should make a shame list of people from these threads and post it every time one pops-up. People do that shit when console war stuff comes up, like the Switch thread, why can't we shame people who support companies that take part in bigoted practices? Don't post stuff out there if you're not willing to back it up. And don't call yourself a fucking ally
I think part of it is a testament to just how shitty the fast food experience has become that people are so amazed when one (albeit ethically gross) company manages to do it right for a change.
For example, I love my local Whataburger but unless you go there during graveyard hours the drive thru is always at least 3 cars deep, it takes 10+ minutes to get a single combo meal, and there's a 1-in-3 chance your order will be wrong. And I don't even get mad about that because I've just come to expect it.
Just wait until they mention their brother's friend's cousin who is gay and owns a CFA or their aunt's paperboy's daycare worker who is gay and eats there.
No one is stopping you from ignoring people. You see it, just tag it
My dude, are you suggesting people get banned for eating a chicken sandwichA progressive website like this shouldn't require its users to find and ignore bigoted content/users. They should be taking care of that for us with bans or notices at the very least.
You are calling me a bigot for thinking that people shouldn't automatically be labeled 'pieces of trash' for eating at Chick-fil-A? You know nothing about me apart from that one fact. You don't know that, in some respects, I might've led a much less privileged life than you have: from having been raised in a very poor, shitty wooden house in rural Puerto Rico, to having lived through a Category 4 Hurricane that left me and my loved ones without running water and power for 3 months. You don't know what I've done to make a positive difference in other people's lives. What you're essentially saying is that even if you did know about all those things, that one fact about myself (that I don't think it's fair to label people irredeemable trash for their unethical consumption) is the overriding factor in deeming me a bigot? Really...? It's not dismissive to question whether it makes sense to label ("without exception") people "pieces of trash" for the fast food they consume. You're labeling and dismissing as irredeemable trash millions of otherwise good people based on one data point alone. If that can't be challenged or questioned, what the fuck can be?Argument? You have no argument. You came in, ignored all the LGBT people who have mentioned why these constant threads praising CFA are shitty and shat out some whataboutism.
I'm not living a sad life, mostly because I'm not a bigot who defends bigots. But that's your prerogative, guy.
Will there be protests when Chick-fil-A opens its doors? It's certainly possible—Seattle loves a good picket, although Bitter Lake is kinda out of the way and people were so excited for fried chicken and waffle fries when the company opened up in Federal Way that they actually camped out overnight to get it, but I've always found it interesting which businesses we choose to boycott and which we do not. The president of Chick-fil-A has some crazy and clearly bigoted beliefs, to be sure, but tons of other corporations have donated to anti-gay politicians and no one pitches a fit about it on Twitter, much less starts a boycott. Even worse, some of these companies do it while promoting themselves as pro-gay.
This hypocrisy is never on full display as much as it is this time of year, when companies dutifully change their social media avatars to rainbow flags and tell their queer employees to march in gay Pride parades while also donating to politicians who support anti-queer legislation. Over at Popular Information, someone compiled a post with a breakdown of companies that profess their support for the queer community while donating to lawmakers who vote to deny or rollback LGBTQ protections. AT&T, according to the post, donated $2.7 million to 193 anti-gay politicians between 2017 and 2018; UPS donated $2.4 million to 159 anti-gay politicians; Comcast donated $2.1 million to 154 anti-gay pols; and on and on and on and on and on. It's what corporations do: They pander and market and make you think that by putting up a rainbow flag once a month, they are anything but money-hungry, bottom-feeding corporate swine.
Now, this doesn't mean I'll be frequenting Chick-fil-A (it's not that good, and where the hell is Bitter Lake?), and I fully support anyone who chooses to wage some kind of protest against this company coming to Seattle. But at the same time, if you're going to boycott Chick-fil-A for being anti-gay, you may want to consider boycotting companies that wave Pride flags while donating to politicians who harm actual queer people.
Linking Katie Herzog in this lol?the Stranger spoke on the hypocrisy of people opposing Chick Fil A but still giving business to other businesses
In its effort to be inclusive, "The Future Is Nonbinary" (now also available as a t-shirt) does exactly the same thing that Porten complains about: It erases a population. In this case, the population is women, both cis and trans. Perhaps ironically, it seems to be mostly young women doing the erasing, and when our news feeds are filled with stories of women being harassed, assaulted, and oppressed, it's not hard to see why they'd reject being a woman at all.
Lmao. Y'all too much.My dude, are you suggesting people get banned for eating a chicken sandwich
My dude, are you suggesting people get banned for eating a chicken sandwich
You can't just say the word "Whataboutism" as if it's a rock solid argument when people point out that other companies donate to the same anti LGBTQA+ non-profits.
Nobody demands posters get banned when they talk about an Amazon Black Friday sale or say they like the new Google Pixel.
I do not think most people know about or care about the politics. I am not sure what to think about the politics. I eat, I am certain, factory farmed meat even though I think it is a practice that should be ended due to environmental impact. I never really looked into it, regardless I cannot afford to spend extra money every week on meat atm. If I could I would upgrade to grass fed/finished beef and organic/uncaged chicken, etc..
Wait a minute, So now we are bigots because we go to chic-fil-A to eat? We talk about whataboutism but companies like apple and google deserve more backlash because of there practises and you can't claim "whataboutism" just to turn around and call people that eat at chic fil a bigots. I for one didn't read any of the replies until after i posted my response cause the thread title clearly asked what is special about chic-fil A and not if i support bigots.
**Also, people need to get over boycotting places based on what their administration chooses to donate to (Salvation Army and FCA). Every Chik-fil-a restaurant is willing to serve anybody who walks through the door. If we all boycotted businesses with administrators we disagreed with we would have a fractured society with businesses for the left and businesses for the right.
Wild concept, but one can point out that their service is above most in many regions (not everyone has Raising Canes or a lot of other regional places) while also recognizing and condemning their bullshit. CFA wouldn't even be on the radar if places like Popeyes can get their act together on the service end.
I think those who just come in with just praise are tone deaf to much of the community here, but there is also a ton of leeway given to other companies for obvious reasons despite them donating to similar organizations and having other problematic issues.
Again, fuck CFA, but hopefully more companies take from them the stuff that works as a service and incorporate them to make CFA irrelevant.
You are calling me a bigot for thinking that people shouldn't automatically be labeled 'pieces of trash' for eating at Chick-fil-A? You know nothing about me apart from that one fact. You don't know that, in some respects, I might've led a much less privileged life than you have: from having been raised in a very poor, shitty wooden house in rural Puerto Rico, to having lived through a Category 4 Hurricane that left me and my loved ones without running water and power for 3 months. You don't know what I've done to make a positive difference in other people's lives. What you're essentially saying is that even if you did know about all those things, that one fact about myself (that I don't think it's fair to label people irredeemable trash for their unethical consumption) is the overriding factor in deeming me a bigot? Really...? It's not dismissive to question whether it makes sense to label ("without exception") people "pieces of trash" for the fast food they consume. You're labeling and dismissing as irredeemable trash millions of otherwise good people based on one data point alone. If that can't be challenged or questioned, what the fuck can be?
And to be clear, it *is* dismissive and insensitive to pop into a thread, ignore all the ongoing discussion, and simply post "I love Chick-fil-A," but that's not what I'm doing.
To address these points:
CFA is in a very specific situation where they not only donate to SA like other companies do, they donate to even worse organizations. They also score a zero on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation's Corporate Equality Index which those other companies do not do. On top of that, the President of the company has come out and said bigoted shit.
This is all in your face bigoted bullshit that isn't the same as those other things. Other companies do shitty things too, however, and we should definitely talk about those companies. That should be done in threads about those companies and not used to deflect that CFA is shitty.
Adding another quote for the remainder of this post: