It's still too early. Democrats are beating up on other Democrats every day, and even in threads like this, even in a thread where the title is basically "Trump wins in 2020 versus everyone but Biden," a not small number of posts will use that as further reason to shit on Biden. Like, Biden hypothetically beating Trump while other candidates hypothetically lose to Trump is "Another reason not to vote for Joe Biden!" or whatever. Joe Biden is not my preferred candidate, but I'm not playing that game. Once the Democratic field narrows and once the primaries play out, I think we'll get a better sense of performance. Maybe it'll be too late by then, like maybe a struggling Joe Biden will barely win the primary and he'll be weakened to independents and Trump gets a bump, or maybe a Warren or Sanders makes the Democratic ticket look too out of touch with other independents. Who knows, it's still too early and I wouldn't use a poll as a decision to support someone or not.
Most importantly, though, general election polls are not as significant as state-by-state polls, which is how Trump won in 2016 obviously. Clinton actually performed at about what the national polls suggested, but underperformed by less than 100,000 voters split over 4 or 5 states, and that's why Trump is president. Putting decisive weight into those 100,000 voters, a year out from the election, is giving them more power than they already deserve.
Moreover, though, an overwhelming amount of attention is spent on why voters in the Democratic primary
shouldn't support one candidate or another, instead of why they should support them. It's inevitable, you can't help it, but this isn't even among news makers, but among people like us discussing the primary... you can't help but focus on the demerits of a candidate. Even if the merits of your favorite candidate is your chief concern in why you're voting for them, people spend an unbalance amount of energy talking about the demerits of their perceived opponents. The number of threads discussing why some candidate *can't* be the nominee will outweigh why some candidate *should* be the nominee by like 10:1. Of course, it's the nature of divisive primaries and Democratic voters are as ideologically divided as they've been in 50+ years.
I don't understand how Trump has been polling better lately
Yeah, it's depressing, but I hate when we reduce it to "The Voters are Stupid," or something else which is pretty common in threads like this. Now, of course, people are dumb, just like you and I and others sighing about dumb or evil voters are also dumb.
But, I think there's more at work.
First, there's been surprisingly positive economic news in the last month:
- Better than expected jobs report
- Better than expected growth
- Better than expected consumer spending
- Surprise compromises on North American trade deal
- Surprise compromises on Asia/Pacific trade deal
In the real world of people working, those are just more important than what a sizeable portion of people think is political football (Trump's illegal Biden investigation attempt and the Democrats justified response to that).
But, also at play is something more nefarious and it's the Knowledge Brokers. It's not so much that the voting populace is dumb, sure it is we're all dumb, but that knowledge is brokered to us, and an increasingly large portion of those knowledge brokers are brokering incorrect knowledge serving ulterior motives. The nefarious, agenda-driven, ideologically motivated, and some are profit-driven (though I think selling ideology is more important to most of them than shareholder or stakeholder profit), but the motives are not to spread truth.