Agree for the most part, up until the bold. For me that's a) take care of your stuff and b) if the cost or difficulty of repair makes it not that viable then I wouldn't see it as an expectation. Obviously it would be better if it happened everywhere for everything, but my point is that I don't see it as that a surprising thing, rather I would be surprised if this were limited to just Apple. That I don't know though, whether it is. The outrage is positioned as though it is but that would genuinely be a surprise to me.
That said I've never broken an electronic outside of warranty to the extent that iMac Pro is broken and haven't been in a situation to have that knowledge. Guess I've just never really thought much about it and assumed 'shit's on you' if you break it and you just hope they're open to repairing it.
I have no idea if it's just Apple, maybe other companies do that, It'll piss me off just the same it was Microsoft or Sony or whatever. The outrage is positioned against Apple in this case because... The thing Linus broke was an Apple product. No one necessarily said this is exclusive to Apple.
a) "take care of your stuff" is bullshit and anti-consumer. Accidents happen.
b) If the cost of the parts + labor is more than the product, I would understand a refusal to fix the item. That's not the case here and is very seldom the case. In this case, the total for the parts and labor according to Linus is 3200, much less than buying a new iMac Pro.
I never broke anything that badly either, but if I did and I got that response from Apple, I'd be super pissed. Shit is still very much on me, since I'll have to pay for the repairs, but there has to be a limit for the amount of shit that has to be on me, there's no reason to have the whole bucket of shit be on me.