I don't understand, didn't they say booster shots were already approved and people could go and get them at the 6 month mark from the original shot?
They are still debating for older population. This was for all current age groups.My Dad is 71 with Diabetes and Parkinson's, and was vaccinated back in March, the data is clear that elderly and high risk people like him need the Booster. What is wrong with these people???
title is a bit misleadingThe panel, however, could still clear the shots for older populations.
I'm surprised. Here in the UK the Pfizer boosters are going ahead for all over 50s. Wonder what the FDA knows that the MHRA doesn't (or vice versa).
High-income countries have promised to donate more than 1 billion doses, but less than 15 percent of those doses have materialized, Dr. Tedros added. And while low-income countries have been rolling out the doses they have been able to get, the supply is highly constrained. "Because manufacturers have prioritized or been legally obliged to fulfill bilateral deals with rich countries willing to pay top dollar, low-income countries have been deprived of the tools to protect their people," Dr. Tedros said.
Meanwhile, in low-income countries, initial doses of vaccines have yet to reach even the elderly and frontline health workers—those most vulnerable to severe outcomes and death. In a press briefing earlier this month, the executive director of WHO's Health Emergencies Programme, Mike Ryan, likened giving boosters in high-income countries to "hand[ing] out extra life jackets to people who already have life jackets while we're leaving other people to drown."
Another argument against booster doses is that they won't make the world safer, the WHO says. As long as the pandemic coronavirus has largely unvaccinated countries in which to thrive, it will pose a risk to every country. Transmission can easily spread over borders, and high-transmission areas are breeding grounds for new variants, potentially some that could thwart our current generation of vaccines.
"Saying that no one is safe until everyone is safe—it's not a slogan, it's science," O'Brien said.
The WHO maintains that, so far, clinical evidence does not indicate that booster doses are needed to prevent severe outcomes and death from COVID-19, a point that US officials do not dispute. "The vaccines are holding up very, very well against the severe end of the disease spectrum," Kate O'Brien, director of the WHO's Department of Immunization, Vaccines, and Biologicals, said in a press briefing Wednesday. "We're not asking to withhold something for which there is a strong set of evidence that it is needed."
I don't understand, didn't they say booster shots were already approved and people could go and get them at the 6 month mark from the original shot?
Healthy 35 year olds in the US should not be getting 3rd doses before a 70 year old in another country can even get one.
What about JJ recipients? I feel like the nature of that shot is much different. Are they discussing what we should do?
While they said recipients of Johnson & Johnson's single-shot vaccine will likely need boosters, they are awaiting more data in the next few weeks before making a formal recommendation.
I'm curious about this - how? Isn't it not approved yet or is it emergency authorized at this point?
I see, let's hope they approve them for the elderly then. I don't care about myself getting a booster, I just want my Dad to be able to get it. I feel like the data is clear at this that there is a noticeable drop in protection for the elderly past 6 months.They are still debating for older population. This was for all current age groups.
title is a bit misleading
You can get it if you immune compromised. Mom is immune compromised and my dad got it too since they live togetherI'm curious about this - how? Isn't it not approved yet or is it emergency authorized at this point?
It just seems like I started randomly seeing people getting boosters out of nowhere when there seemingly hasn't been an official "here is the booster shot and ____ people can get it"
If some of the doctors are saying they need more time to study this, that's not fucking up.U.S fucks up again in response to COVID, shouldn't really be surprising. Israel shows boosters are extremely helpful.
They have some of the most in-depth data in the world on the effectiveness of Pfizer and are in a unique position to see waning immunity first. Ignoring their data is idiotic.
The US will almost certainly follow suit, but it's important to realise why the UK is doing this. Stopping infections is a fool's errand now, so the UK is focusing its booster programme on people who are statistically at the greatest risk of severe illness or death. They're not doing it to stop people getting COVID; they're doing it to stop people from dying from it.UK has started giving boosters to over 50s so I guess more data is incoming.
It's amazing how being opaque during a crisis destroys your credibilityThis thread is like a reverse anti-vaccine thread. People think they know more about vaccines than the experts, which are who we depended on in the first place.
Unless those friends became severely ill or were in high-risk groups then that's, frankly, the best-case scenario for where the world is at in late 2021.Damn... like 7 of my vaccinated friends got Covid last month. Was really hoping to get the booster
It is for all the extra people that are going to get breakthrough infections. When Israel shows a third shot reduces the chances of that happening by like 10x.If some of the doctors are saying they need more time to study this, that's not fucking up.
You're right. Fortunately, for the most part they didn't but one of them had to go to the hospitalUnless those friends became severely ill then that's, frankly, the best-case scenario for where the world is at in late 2021.
I believe it'll be submitted to the FDA by the end of the month for kids between five and twelve.where the hell are we with people under 16. My 9 year old keeps me up at night.
Data for 5-12 is submitted to the FDA. 12+ is approved.where the hell are we with people under 16. My 9 year old keeps me up at night.
Putting a booster into a person means not putting that same shot in someone unvaccinated.I fear that a year from now, we will look back on this with the same hindsight that we now have for the original messaging on masks ("not proven out, only needed for medical pros") and the droplet / aerosol debate ("6 feet is enough, it doesn't linger in the air").
I understand that the panel wants more data, but I worry that by the time we meet the standard of proof they are looking for, breakthrough cases will be contributing significantly to US case and death totals during the winter months. I hope those worries prove unfounded.