wanting to pay for a repair of a product in an official service center because said product is broken is an edge caseThis seems like such an edge case that's really only relevant to tech pundits and fanboy wars.
wanting to pay for a repair of a product in an official service center because said product is broken is an edge caseThis seems like such an edge case that's really only relevant to tech pundits and fanboy wars.
This is how I feel when wrestling fans talk about "the boys" and "working" and shitBecause we're not journalists (and journalists don't use it in every context), and it just comes off as a lame attempt at being industry savvy. It's also confusing for people who don't know what city every company's headquarters is located in.
I think in the video he says even parted out with labor it should only cost like $2500, less than the cost of a new computerYou guys realize he efficiently broke the entire computer right?
He already got the parts that were broken replaced for much less than the cost of the machine.You guys realize he efficiently broke the entire computer right?
I think in the video he says even parted out with labor it should only cost like $2500, less than the cost of a new computer
Double post too, sorry!
He already got the parts that were broken replaced for much less than the cost of the machine.
Can people just stop with this nonsense narrative already?
So what you're saying is it's only interesting to the potential customers for iMac Pros?
I wouldn't fix his computer, unless it was highly in my favor, and even then it would highly be a vanity project. He broke the display, logic board, and PSU, as such it's highly likely there were other components that were damaged. People there's a lot more that goes into repair than you realize.
Exactly. And even if the repairs were easy for Apple to do, they have no obligation to repair something he caused himself. Call it an instance of bad customer customer service if you must, but people are calling out Apple as breaking laws and acting as if they are routinely telling people with a cracked iPhone to fuck off.
So what you're saying is it's only interesting to the potential customers for iMac Pros?
Only the potential customers who plan to do a complete teardown and happen to be so inept as to destroy the screen, motherboard and PSU in the process. The other 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of potential iMac Pro customers should be fine.
The stuff about way Apple handles the third party repair shops is horrid, and IMO- is the real story here. What specifically happened with Linus' iMac Pro is of much less relevance because it's so far out of the norm. It requires an end-user wanting to do something that essentially no end-user actually does with an iMac, and being reckless to the point of hilarity on top of it all.
So what he thinks it costs. Here's the thing, Apple is a highly secretive company so getting a proper parts estimate is next to impossible. Also, the cost is not just parts and labor.
Have you watched the videos, at all?So what he thinks it costs. Here's the thing, Apple is a highly secretive company so getting a proper parts estimate is next to impossible. Also, the cost is not just parts and labor.
I wouldn't fix his computer, unless it was highly in my favor, and even then it would highly be a vanity project. He broke the display, logic board, and PSU, as such it's highly likely there were other components that were damaged. People there's a lot more that goes into repair than you realize.
it boils down to:
Followed by a tunnelbear advertisement.
And the one released yesterday that caused this thread to be bumped and addresses the nonsense you're posting.
And the one released yesterday that caused this thread to be bumped and addresses the nonsense you're posting.
Lmao you are literally trying to prevent us from discussing Apple's shit policies by lyingI'm actually surprised that a thread about a clickbait youtube video made in bad faith has lasted this long without getting locked. The content is very clearly biased and designed to profit off the ad traffic from a very particular demographic.
And the one released yesterday that caused this thread to be bumped and addresses the nonsense you're posting.
Lmao you are literally trying to prevent us from discussing Apple's shit policies by lying
Good luck
How is it made in bad faith?
Good attempt to derail the thread. Maybe next time it'll workIsn't Linus a thief? Didn't he steal hygiene pads from the Amazon store?
Yes, he's a hardened criminal and can't be trusted.Isn't Linus a thief? Didn't he steal hygiene pads from the Amazon store?
Yeah that dirty liar and a thief!Isn't Linus a thief? Didn't he steal hygiene pads from the Amazon store?
Yeah that dirty liar and a thief!
How can anyone trust anything he says on his "bad faith" and clickbait videos!
The real story here is that this terrible person is spreading lies and propaganda about poor innocent Apple who did nothing wrong, and is the best, like the best company in this whole world.
Are you purposely being disengenuous.
The event was cleared by representatives of Amazon IIRC. Do you really think a business owner with a family actually drove across the border onto foreign soil to commit an actual crime, only to then post video evidence to his millions of subscribers?Are you telling me if a minority stole a candy bar he wouldn't go to jail, And be labeled a thief?
Yep, that is bullshit!One part that also threw me for a loop was that they were demanding replacement of the entire logic board, CPU, and ram even though the RAM and CPU are socketed!
Reminds me of when they sent the Apple goon squad after the Gizmodo guy lol.
Feel free to regard this as bad customer service, but you are so very wrong otherwise.
- I make a video demonstrating how luxury furniture is manufactured. I drill holes in the center of a $6000 kitchen table, that furniture company is not breaking the law by regarding it as a total loss and providing no path for me to have it repaired.
- If I mistakenly rip a $3000 dress. The designer has no obligation to provide guidance on how to restore it, offer a replacement at the same price, or find me a tailor.
- I buy a $1000 golf club. I bend the club 20 degrees to see how it would improve my game. Hooray if I can find someone to repair it, but the pro shop and club maker are within their rights to tell me to pound sand.
And my God the way they treat their 'partners' is downright orwellian. Reminds me of when they sent the Apple goon squad after the Gizmodo guy lol..
Gizmodo knowingly paid money for a stolen iPhone 4 prototype, IIRC. They deserved it.
It's so cool to hate on Apple. Makes you unique and lets everyone know that you "think different" :)
I mean, you clearly didn't watch the new video. You just knee-jerk defended a multi-hundred-billion dollar company worth more than the Netherlands.
They paid for a stolen device and then posted about it online. It definitely left a lot of tech writers in a weird spot of "is this right" but you cannot act like Apple was in the wrong there. It was stolen, prototype.[/QUOTE
It's not black and white though. Gizmodo and Chen have some real culpability imho, but sending a team to kick in doors seems .. silly? At the very least, bad PR.
https://www.wired.com/2010/04/iphone-raid/
Edit : found the article that I remember was a good follow up summary, pretty incredible stuff.
https://www.itworld.com/article/273...ared--da-ignores-apple--gestapo--tactics.html
I mean, you clearly didn't watch the new video. You just knee-jerk defended a multi-hundred-billion dollar company worth more than the Netherlands.
Perhaps you should watch it then instead of claiming you know so much when you've known very little about this issue in the first place.Really because I'm looking at a totaled product that I personally would refuse to fix. As for Apple's shit policies and down right illegal right to repair I am 100% against. If they don't want source parts for repair that's fine but they should release the documentation/schematics for said parts and not litigate unauthorized third-part repair shops. No I did not watch the second video at the time of my posting as I was unaware it existed. Also lol at defend, buddy you know nothing of what I do.
Really because I'm looking at a totaled product that I personally would refuse to fix. As for Apple's shit policies and down right illegal right to repair I am 100% against. If they don't want source parts for repair that's fine but they should release the documentation/schematics for said parts and not litigate unauthorized third-part repair shops. No I did not watch the second video at the time of my posting as I was unaware it existed. Also lol at defend, buddy you know nothing of what I do.
considering the shitty thing that apple did do did happen, how the fuck is it "clickbait"? Apple is a shit company that is 100% in the wrong here.I'm actually surprised that a thread about a trashy clickbait youtube video (obvi made in bad faith since everyone at LTT is a PCMR type) has lasted this long without getting locked. The content is very clearly biased and designed to capitalize off the ad traffic from a very particular demographic.
No, it's more comparable to drilling a hole in your oven door and expecting to be able to get the door replaced without buying an entire new oven.
considering the shitty thing that apple did do did happen, how the fuck is it "clickbait"? Apple is a shit company that is 100% in the wrong here.
Perhaps you should watch it then instead of claiming you know so much when you've known very little about this issue in the first place.
Oh certainly, Apple are entitled to refuse to do the works themselves but they should be willing to sell the spares so it could be fixed either by the user or a repair shop. If they want to press the 'authorised shops only' strategy, then they need to open up the channels for those people who bothered trying to work with Apple on this.
As it's been pointed out many times, even a Mac Pro is made up of many individual components which could be replaced. So what if Linus broke most of those and so what if he did it on purpose. Apple's stance on this is bullshit and deserves to be called out.
Exactly. And even if the repairs were easy for Apple to do, they have no obligation to repair something he caused himself. Call it an instance of bad customer customer service if you must, but people are calling out Apple for breaking laws over this.
What world do you live in? If I get in a car accident that's my fault I'm not allowed to get my car repaired?
Look people I like Apple's products. They're in the wrong here.