• Ever wanted an RSS feed of all your favorite gaming news sites? Go check out our new Gaming Headlines feed! Read more about it here.
  • We have made minor adjustments to how the search bar works on ResetEra. You can read about the changes here.

Wackamole

Member
Oct 27, 2017
16,969
Ow, that joke sure bit him in the ass.

Wait, is he getting jailtime over this joke? Or wasn't it meant to be a joke?
Sorry, i don't know the guy. Is he a neoNazi or something like that? I thought it was a joke to mess with his GF.
 

QuantumBro

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
288
Late on the reply there, but to add I wasn't replying to say it should show him being guilty but I'm trying to show all of the " but he seems like a normal guy outside of this" posters that he isn't Average Joe and is a skeezebag outside of this case.

But you haven't because you still haven't posted any proof that you claims are correct. I even did a google search of "Mark Meechan deport mexicans" and found nothing about that.
 

Raven117

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,112
I don't know how the law that was violated in the U.K. reads...would be curious.

This is bad U.K., this is a blow to freedom.
 

Wiggles

Member
Oct 28, 2017
492
User Banned (1 Week): For false equivalencies surrounding Nazism and a pattern of downplaying hate movements.

vrcsix

Member
Oct 29, 2017
1,083
I mean, this isn't too far removed from a Chaser's bit, is it? Dude's not gonna perform in front of a studio audience any time soon, but it's clearly intended as a piss take.

Besides: the whole court ruling seems out of place to me. Offense is taken, not given.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
But you haven't because you still haven't posted any proof that you claims are correct. I even did a google search of "Mark Meechan deport mexicans" and found nothing about that.

It's Markus Meechan (or he goes by this primarily). His twitter is full of 4chan edgy shit, but this sentencing isn't to do with his twitter account but the single video explicitly.

I think the UK has actually blocked the video now, possibly due to this court case

nf7w4Pn.png


Mirror here

 
Oct 25, 2017
3,784
If you disagree at least tell me why. Comedy can and should be able to cover even the darkest of subject matter but if you are going to cover something that could conceivably be harmful to a group of people your material cannot just be an attack, it needs to be more than that. The most recent example that comes to mind is the latest Ricky Gervais stand up special, he dedicated far too much time attacking trans people...and that was it, there was no message, no irony, just an attack on a group of people under the guise of "humour". Punching down for a quick joke at the expense of someone else is bad comedy, simple as that.

Are you going to answer my question whether you think that "bad comedy" should warrant an arrest or not?
 

SoundLad

Member
Oct 30, 2017
2,263
I remember this video, can't believe he got found guilty of a hate crime. Also can't believe these low quality posts in this thread. Eg. "I checked out his twitter and he looks like a cunt" like wtf. Also, he's clearly not a nazi.
 

Sedef122

Member
Nov 7, 2017
391
Are you going to answer my question whether you think that "bad comedy" should warrant an arrest or not?

Sorry wasn't ignoring you I just missed that one. It wasn't just "bad comedy" though was it? Is was a racist and anti Semitic act perpetrated under the guise of "humour" and going by the mans history was likely more than simply him trying to annoy his girlfriend. So, to answer your question, yes he should have been arrested.
 

TP-DK

Member
Oct 28, 2017
2,055
Denmark
Sorry wasn't ignoring you I just missed that one. It wasn't just "bad comedy" though was it? Is was a racist and anti Semitic act perpetrated under the guise of "humour" and going by the mans history was likely more than simply him trying to annoy his girlfriend. So, to answer your question, yes he should have been arrested.

How can you tell that judging from the video alone?
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,784
Sorry wasn't ignoring you I just missed that one. It wasn't just "bad comedy" though was it? Is was a racist and anti Semitic act perpetrated under the guise of "humour" and going by the mans history was likely more than simply him trying to annoy his girlfriend. So, to answer your question, yes he should have been arrested.

So you do believe intent is important, despite saying it isn't before? Do you feel the link I posted earlier should be a criminal offense?
 

Holundrian

Member
Oct 25, 2017
9,322
Can't help but feel happy. Seen his destiny debate and oh boi I just have no hope for people like that their stupidity is actually criminal.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
Sorry wasn't ignoring you I just missed that one. It wasn't just "bad comedy" though was it? Is was a racist and anti Semitic act perpetrated under the guise of "humour" and going by the mans history was likely more than simply him trying to annoy his girlfriend. So, to answer your question, yes he should have been arrested.
The court isn't evaluating his history, they are evaluating the video alone.
 

De Amigo

Member
Dec 19, 2017
482
It's shitty for him to have people "salty" about it (forcibly being removed my home sure would get me "salty") but it doesn't look like he did any of the reporting himself like you claimed.
He's signal boosting it to try and get them deported but he's letting his followers do it for him, I still count that as trying to get them deported. They do this a lot, quote tweet someone doing something but never directly do it yourself so your angry followers will do it for you and you can claim "Well it wasn't me and I cant control my fans."
 
Last edited:

trashhero

Banned
Feb 27, 2018
137
Saint-Petersburg
In UK hate speech is illegal, and saying to gas the jews is one of them. Only in US you will be allowed to deny the holocaust, works well for the US doesn't it?
Erm, only 16 conutries (almost all of them european) punish people for holocaust denial. Majority of the world, including Norway and Denmark, have no problem with you denying holocaust.
 

Krauser Kat

Member
Oct 27, 2017
1,720
I remember this video, can't believe he got found guilty of a hate crime. Also can't believe these low quality posts in this thread. Eg. "I checked out his twitter and he looks like a cunt" like wtf. Also, he's clearly not a nazi.
racism and nazi jokes are not "jokes" its another platform to to spread hate. Everyone asking for proof of him being a nazi isnt going to be satisfied until someone is dead, is how people get killed by this shit.

Throw them in jail, punch them in the face, make lives of people who spread hate as hard as you can make them is the only way to stop them.
 

KHarvey16

Banned
Oct 27, 2017
9,193
There's plenty of need for introspection but when you offer an alternative it's usually nice to have a some data to prove that this method is better. I don't agree with this decision and work should be done as with all legal systems to ensure the punishment fits the crime and has a positive effect on society.

The thing usual when American propose the benefits of free speech they not talking about adjustments to make these more fair but rather alignment to those in America while not giving a single piece of evidence why that's an improvement. That's pointless. If your going to take for example monetary advice from someone neck deep in debt the minimum criteria should be some fact based evidence of it's benefits.

The analogy doesn't work because you presume a direct link between less restricted speech and more racial issues.

I don't know if any research demonstrating the positive influence of freer speech (and I'm not sure how you could isolate it to the extent you would have to to do that). I think history and study of human nature and societies however supports the idea that limiting a population's ability to publicly discuss a thing a) doesn't lessen its prevalence and b) restricts a population's ability to identify these problems and treat them as the symptoms they are and actually address the causes.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
I remember this video, can't believe he got found guilty of a hate crime. Also can't believe these low quality posts in this thread. Eg. "I checked out his twitter and he looks like a cunt" like wtf. Also, he's clearly not a nazi.

He is a bit of a cunt, but him being a cunt shouldn't be correlated as "only people I like have rights in the eyes of the state".

When the courts act like North Korea with intent/context you get stupid shit like this

R v Paul Chambers (appealed to the High Court as Chambers v Director of Public Prosecutions), popularly known as the Twitter Joke Trial, was a United Kingdom legal case centred on the conviction of a man under the Communications Act 2003 for posting a joke about destroying an airport to Twitter, a message which police regarded as "menacing". The conviction was widely condemned as a miscarriage of justice,[2][3][4][5] and was appealed three times, the conviction being quashed as a result of the third appeal.[6]

During late December 2009 and early January 2010, cold weather had resulted in considerable disruption across northern England. Robin Hood Airport in South Yorkshire was one of many airports which was forced to cancel flights. On 6 January 2010,[7][8][9] an intending traveller, Paul Chambers, then aged 28,[10] who was planning to fly to Northern Ireland to meet his then girlfriend (later wife), posted a message on Twitter:

Crap! Robin Hood airport is closed. You've got a week and a bit to get your shit together otherwise I'm blowing the airport sky high!![11]

A week later, an off-duty manager at the airport found the message whilst doing an unrelated computer search.[9] The airport management considered the message to be "not credible" as a threat,[9]but contacted the police anyway. Chambers was arrested by anti-terror police at his office,[9] his house was searched and his mobile phone, laptop and desktop hard drive were confiscated.[11] He was later charged with "sending a public electronic message that was grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character contrary to the Communications Act 2003".[9][12] On 10 May, he was found guilty at Doncaster magistrates' court,[9] fined £385 and ordered to pay £600 costs.[10] He lost his job as a consequence.[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Joke_Trial

I agree with the judge earlier saying what you put out there can have consequences, but a court of law shouldn't be above "intent/context" by stating "we simply decide". That's veering into the often "misused" lingo of "thought-crime".

Losing your job, being shunned, going viral and being lambasted are all social consequences but having the state convict you and put you on trial is a whole different realm. One where intent/context SHOULD be the thing that saves you from jail/having a criminal record.
 

Sedef122

Member
Nov 7, 2017
391
So you do believe intent is important, despite saying it isn't before? Do you feel the link I posted earlier should be a criminal offense?

Wow you got me! Clever old you...the issue is the video, it is racist and anti Semitic, it is clear cut and you trying to undermine it as bad comedy is disingenuous. You are right, bringing in his past clouded the issue and I apologise.
 
Oct 25, 2017
3,784
I'm honestly a bit flabbergasted over the response in the same way I was flabbergasted when people started calling the ACLU alt-right. Free expression becoming a partisan issue with it being more supported by the side I ideologically oppose in every other way is madness.
 

Deleted member 11413

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
22,961
He is a bit of a cunt, but him being a cunt shouldn't be correlated as "only people I like have rights in the eyes of the state".

When the courts act like North Korea with intent/context you get stupid shit like this





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Joke_Trial

I agree with the judge earlier saying what you put out there can have consequences, but a court of law shouldn't be above "intent/context" by stating "we simply decide". That's veering into the often "misused" lingo of "thought-crime".

Losing your job, being shunned, going viral and being lambasted are all social consequences but having the state convict you and put you on trial is a whole different realm. One where intent/context SHOULD be the thing that saves you from jail/having a criminal record.
Yup, another example of this very same law being abused for situations which are clearly poor attempts at humor and not actual threats.
 

TalonJH

Member
Oct 27, 2017
4,922
Louisville, KY
Off thead subject but I had to reply to this.

They aren't growing, they are withering. It only looks like growth because many of those who've kept it to themselves or their social circle are now exposing themselves.

This isn't true. At least not in America.
Hate groups increase for second consecutive year as Trump electrifies radical right
The number of hate groups in the United States rose for a second year in a row in 2016 as the radical right was energized by the candidacy of Donald Trump, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center's (SPLC) annual census of hate groups and other extremist organizations, released today.

The SPLC found that the number of hate groups operating in 2016 rose to 917 – up from 892 in 2015. The number is 101 shy of the all-time record set in 2011, but high by historic standards.
https://www.splcenter.org/news/2017...secutive-year-trump-electrifies-radical-right
 
OP
OP
EightBitNate

EightBitNate

Banned
Nov 2, 2017
1,644
He's signal boosting it to try and get them deported but he's letting his followers do it for him, I still count that as trying to get them deported. They do this a lot, quote tweet someone doing something but never directly do it yourself so your angry followers will do it for you and you can claim "Well it wasn't me and I cant control my fans."

It's fine if you see it that way but I think most people would like to make the distinction themselves.
 

blinky

Attempted to circumvent ban with an alt account
Banned
Oct 27, 2017
1,329
Throw them in jail, punch them in the face, make lives of people who spread hate as hard as you can make them is the only way to stop them.
I agree, except I would change "them" to "you." If we're going to throw people in jail for crimethink, let's start with the censors first. Then we'll sort things out from there.
 

Ketkat

Banned
Oct 25, 2017
4,727
That doesn't mean that there are more people overall who hold those views, rather more of the people who hold those views feel comfortable and able to publically express them.

Yeah, they feel more comfortable expressing them so they're clearly withering! Come on SG. Its okay to admit when you're wrong.
 

Deleted member 888

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
14,361
Making a "humorous" (differs on opinion) joke relating to Nazis does not equal being a Nazi.

I guess Pewdiepie should be arrested and be considered a Nazi now too, based on what people say in this thread.

As PDP is in the UK (I only discovered this last year on GAF, I always thought he was in America), you would have to ask why did his "Kill all Jews" video not result in him being arrested under the communications act for being "grossly offensive"?

He received some, but arguably not enough, social/employment repercussions, but the UK police did not arrest? Why not? Would they argue he made an offensive... joke, so context/intent was apparent there, but then, why not here when this dumb ass opens with explaining why he was doing what he did?

PDP said he was doing it to see if he could pay something like $5 for a highly offensive banner, Meechan said he was doing it as it was the least cute thing imaginable to piss off his girlfriend. The UK courts would have to explain to us why context/intent only matters in one of these cases?
 

De Amigo

Member
Dec 19, 2017
482
Alright so at least we've all gotten past the "he's seems like a nice guy" phase into "Well at least he's not a full blown nazi" phase. Like guys I agree the sentencing is bad but please stop falling for the spin of "He was just a good citizen going about his life until the out of control nanny state put him behind bars."
 

Dekim

Member
Oct 28, 2017
4,335
https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...an-charged-over-alleged-killallwhitemen-tweet

Does no one remember Bahar Mustafa? She luckily had her charges dropped but remember to keep this in mind when it works against you... Did this racist guy really commit a hate crime with his video? We speak of overburdened prison populations and you want this guy arrested,charged and sentenced? Draconian government laws should always be challenged.

Granted he is a bad person, his views abhorrent, but he uploaded a video where he was taunting his gf and trained his pug to raise his paws saying Nazi stuff about jews.

But hey, if the people in the UK want this, that is their choice. You reap what you sow. Just remember when you give your government the power to regulate some speech, it can be all speech and it would just take the election of a certain group to outlaw something else you may stand for.

I remember this case when it was discussed back on GAF. A lot of users were angry she was even charged. Cannot see how you can be angry about that yet be totally cool with this.
 

Raven117

Attempted to circumvent ban with alt account
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
3,112
He is a bit of a cunt, but him being a cunt shouldn't be correlated as "only people I like have rights in the eyes of the state".

When the courts act like North Korea with intent/context you get stupid shit like this





https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twitter_Joke_Trial

I agree with the judge earlier saying what you put out there can have consequences, but a court of law shouldn't be above "intent/context" by stating "we simply decide". That's veering into the often "misused" lingo of "thought-crime".

Losing your job, being shunned, going viral and being lambasted are all social consequences but having the state convict you and put you on trial is a whole different realm. One where intent/context SHOULD be the thing that saves you from jail/having a criminal record.
We are in total agreement.
 

Deleted member 1041

User requested account closure
Banned
Oct 25, 2017
10,725
why are people going to die on a hill for this dirtbag

he's a racist

if he's debating Destiny

he's a fucking racist. He didn't stumble onto Destinys skype on accident and decided to have a nice debate.

my god, some people