What right is being violated here?Then your "radical view" is that rights don't exist and the rule of law should be discarded. I wish that were, in fact, a radical view.
What right is being violated here?Then your "radical view" is that rights don't exist and the rule of law should be discarded. I wish that were, in fact, a radical view.
Well, that's a crux of the matter - i don't have anything to do with neither America nor Western Europe, yet somehow i am partially responsible for murders caused by nazis just because i pointed out that you don't have an actual argument besides appeal to emotions. It seems to me that your only concern is that particular person gets punished by the government, while ideological consistancy can be thrown out of the window, as long as people you don't like are the ones targeted.if you want to sit on the sidelines until people end up dead, fine by me, but you are might as well be one yourself at that point. Nazi are killing people in america and else where.
So long as the ISIS sympathisers aren't actually doing anything but marching, they should be allowed the freedom to do so like we always let the Nazis do. Free speech covers a lot of expressions!Yes, teaching a pug to do a nazi salute for the lulz is exactly like ISIS marching in the streets...
Well, that's a crux of the matter - i don't have anything to do with neither America nor Western Europe, yet somehow i am partially responsible for murders caused by nazis just because i pointed out that you don't have an actual argument besides appeal to emotions. It seems to me that your only concern is that particular person gets punished by the government, while ideological consistancy can be thrown out of the window, as long as people you don't like are the ones targeted.
So long as the ISIS sympathisers aren't actually doing anything but marching, they should be allowed the freedom to do so like we always let the Nazis do. Free speech covers a lot of expressions!
It's much simpler than that.
Any action like this that helps perpetuate racism shouldn't be allowed. As there's literally no other value to teaching your dog a nazi salute aside from making racists snigger, there's no problem with the way it was handled.
Obviously not if that was the reason, why are you even asking?Am I a racist because I laughed at the absurdity of teaching a pug something so offensive?
Obviously not if that was the reason, why are you even asking?
Obviously not if that was the reason, why are you even asking?
Maybe this is time for you to support Scottish Independence Quiche? *wink* *wink*
But no, no CD statues. I'd rather have an Alex Salmond statue.
Yeah, that sounds implausible at best, outright ignorant at worst. I don't even know where to begin unpacking everything wrong with that statement.Any action like this that helps perpetuate racism shouldn't be allowed.
Lol at the dog having his wang out while looking sad/guilty.
Good he doesn't get away with it. Now my black pug probably will get hated on by that brainwashed 'superior' fawn.
That fat gobshite? Better reopen the mines...
I'll never support Scottish independence (not that I'll get a vote if it comes to it), but I'll tell you what: if you guys ever go it alone I'll wish you all the best. How about that? :-)
Because according to many here, racism/hate/offensive comments against whites are fine, but terrible towards other races.
EDIT: Extreme comment. I apologize. I don't know if I should leave it up or take it down, but I realize I was kind of generalizing too much here.
It's just that I see comments like this:
"White AMERICAN culture is taking things from other cultures and passing it off as your own. Can't speak about any others tho."
And I can't help but think this is kind of a sweeping generalization about white people in general, and can be seen as kinda offensive (but not very offensive.
And I say this as someone who isn't white.
How the fuck is that similar to "many people here being ok with racism against white people?"
There's nothing wrong with the statement and it's something we should be aiming for as best we can.Yeah, that sounds implausible at best, outright ignorant at worst. I don't even know where to begin unpacking everything wrong with that statement.
You said there was no other value to this other than making racists snigger.
That's not valuable though, obviously, and it's not a direct response to the joke itself but the absurdity surrounding it.because you said there was no other value to it beside to make racists chuckle.
That's not valuable though, obviously, and it's not a direct response to the joke itself but the absurdity surrounding it.
We don't know enough to know if he is or isn't, but stuff like this DOES help perpetuate racism.I think what he did is in poor taste but the joke he is making is pretty clear.
His wife brags about the dog being cute. Nazi's are not cute (aka bad). I'm going to make this cute thing ugly. That's the whole joke. He knows and thinks Nazi's are bad.
Poor taste, but clearly is not an advocate of Naziism.
See, I disagree. The absurdity of a pug doing something so offensive was the joke IMO.
Them not being on the same level is irrelevant to the point that poster was making, which is that any displays of free speech, regardless of degree, by white supremacists are more tolerated than those of black and brown terrorist groups; hell, there are a few posters here whose shtick is literally just to defend "non-violent" displays of Nazism. Overall, he's lamenting the obvious racism, but if you need a more direct comparison just like for any dialogue on Charlottesville.I don't disagree, the comparison I responded to was "we shouldn't allow this because we wouldn't allow that", and I don't think they're anywhere near the same thing.
Again where are these posts?No, leave it up. It's not extreme because I've seen the same nonsense it's no acceptable.
Jail time for being stupid and careless is extreme.We don't know enough to know if he is or isn't, but stuff like this DOES help perpetuate racism.
It does harm, it's stupid, the punishment is fine.
It's only terrifying if you're a Nazi in the UK.This is terrifying.
Arrested and prison time for a fucking joke. What's next? What's the end goal?
It's just that I see comments like this:
"White AMERICAN culture is taking things from other cultures and passing it off as your own. Can't speak about any others tho."
And I can't help but think this is kind of a sweeping generalization about white people in general, and can be seen as kinda offensive (but not very offensive.
And I say this as someone who isn't white.
Even if that's the case, the damage something like this does far outweighs any value.
You can find other absurd things to laugh about that don't help perpetuate racism. Not a big sacrifice for you.
Nepenthe, you continuously make extreme straw man cases and exaggerations that are very questionable at times.It's only terrifying if you're a Nazi in the UK.
If you are such a person, just come to America. The majority here will accept you as a misguided troublemaker who just needs to sit on a liberal's lap and be educated.
I'm guessing you are being heavily tongue in cheek since that movie heavily features Nazi imagery.
Funny.
People who defend this, is it ok to stand in the middle of the street and shout: "Heil Hitler", if it's a joke? I see this as the same thing.
No, the ruling is fine mate. There's no room in our society for the perpetuation of racism, and shit like this does that.The ruling is really stupid. But from the little that I've heard about the guy recently, I don't feel bad for him.
First, your proposition requires completely disregarding last few hundreds of years in jurisprudence advancements, since obviously you classify something as crime by its outcome, not the intent. Second, for each individual "crime" you would have to show causal link between the act (such as dog nazi-saluting) and societal racist tendencies, which i hope you understand is pretty much impossible.There's nothing wrong with the statement and it's something we should be aiming for as best we can.
That doesn't seem like the same thing to me, that lacks context and doesn't have any sort of punchline.People who defend the guy, is it ok to stand in the middle of the street and shout: "Heil Hitler", if it's a joke? I see this as the same thing.
Edit: clarified that I was talking about Dankula
First, your proposition requires completely disregarding last few hundreds of years in jurisprudence advancements, since obviously you classify something as crime by its outcome, not the intent. Second, for each individual "crime" you would have to show causal link between the act (such as dog nazi-saluting) and societal racist tendencies, which i hope you understand is pretty much impossible.
So, unless you can give me a good reason to just throw established legal theory out of the window AND provide receipts to some cutting edge scientific methods, which allow to measure perpetuation of racism by individual actions, i can only describe your proposition as ignorant and short-sighted.
I'm guessing you are being heavily tongue in cheek since that movie heavily features Nazi imagery.
People who defend the guy, is it ok to stand in the middle of the street and shout: "Heil Hitler", if it's a joke? I see this as the same thing.
Actions like this absolutely help perpetuate racism, don't be daft.
It's not the same thing, that's what I was commenting on.
Then you absolutely can show me the receipts to such a claim, can't you?Actions like this absolutely help perpetuate racism, don't be daft.
As far as I can tell, the UK doesn't have the basic "right" to free speech in the same way the US does. There doesn't appear to be a right to violate unless you think this kind of speech is an inalienable right, which if that's the case then there's really no point in arguing about whether he broke the law or not at all.If you take the notion of freedom of speech or freedom expression remotely seriously, then I don't see how you can see this verdict as anything but absurd. And if your general position is that bad things happening to bad people is good, full stop, then that inherently sanctions infinite scenarios of the government violating people's rights.
And if you think freedom of speech should be waived whenever you can draw some indirect connection between an act of speech and acts of violence committed by different people on the basis of some common social or political activity, then no, you don't take freedom of speech remotely seriously.
What receipts do you need to understand how throwing around Racist jokes like this (even if the intent easn't racist itself, which itself is a grey area) perpetuates racism?Then you absolutely can show me the receipts to such a claim, can't you?
Not the same thing as teaching your dog to throw a nazi salute.Have you heard the lyrics of Springtime for Hitler? It's filled with Nazi propaganda. And it's supposed to be funny!