You're reading it very wrong.
We have taken a hard stance on this issue because we feel it is the right thing to do. If there are any individual bans that the recipients' feel were unjustified, they can ask for clarification or reconsideration.
And back in May, Likud was expected to gain 5 more seats had there been elections. This is despite the fact that there's been recommendation by Israeli police that Netanyahu should be charged for corruption.
We generally do not allow the entire population of any nation to be pained with a single brush. That is already policy.
Not the same and you know it. I'm not going to bring up an abundance of examples that the members here already brought up. But this sets a bad president and I'll will gather other members to PM the Admins about such policy because I only see you in these type of threads so excuse me for being a tad suspicious. But for now, I have to follow it out of respect.
But Netanyahu and much of the government are conducting this ethnic cleansing program.
Again I don't know who we is. It could have been anyone of the administration this. and one oh the things this website said it was going to do was a open community that we all have a say in what's going on. And sadly that has not been a thing.
Suspicious about what?
Chikor can talk about this much better than I can but "reopening peace talks" can mean anything. The Democrats are also in favor of opening peace talks but they also don't consider the dignity or lives of Palestinians particularly relevant, which is why almost all of them will unconditionally support mass slaughter of Palestinians. Zionist Union did not have any objections to the slaughter of Gazans that happened recently, for instance.
Incase of the Palestinians, they're mere existence is troubling for the Israeli government.
I think comparisons to tsarist Russia are apt. It shows that the Israeli government is oppressing others the same way that they were themselves oppressed.
It's a decision reached by the administration and moderation team collectively, and we all enforce it. No such policy is made by one person.
Somewhat. The Palestinians are a convenient scapegoat that the Israeli government can conduct actual military campaigns against without much if any fallout.
That's the real core of the problem. A vast majority of the electorate are repeatedly voting for this.
You don't need to invoke Nazis to make your points about Israel today. Nothing is being whitewashed, there is no "both sides."
For the third time, we generally don't allow any blanket condemnation for the whole population of any nation. There is nothing at odds here, it is not an Israel-Specific policy.
But again I just don't know . Because most of the moderation and other major changes are done kind of in a vale of secrecy. I mean look at entertainment era to see what I'm talking about
You're not even condoning us calling the Israeli government Nazi-like in their efforts to wipe out Palestinians. They're settlement policy and this new ruling is coming from the government.
Well, ok. If I was trying trying to do this under the radar I would be doing a real bad job of it.
No, we are not. But is making that comparison more important than your actual point?
Can anyone find the actual research paper that article cites?
By that same token, their highest priority is making the comparison instead of actually discussing what is currently happening.
https://en.idi.org.il/articles/23407
Thank you, found the breakdown:
