she has made an apology
which implies she acknoledges that this is real
Well, that's ironic to say the least.
Sadly the damage is done at this stage, and the conversation of how we exist to prey upon women and strip them of their rights marches on.
she has made an apology
which implies she acknoledges that this is real
Well, that's ironic to say the least.
Sadly the damage is done at this stage, and the conversation of how we exist to prey upon women and strip them of their rights marches on.
Completely. Not to mention the suggestion of segregation comes with the knowledge that with us making up such a small % of the population that we do, and lacking funding support for even our most basic healthcare needs, it makes it a geographical impossibility to have such things be dedicated spaces. Which reinforces the point that none of this is to protect cis women, it's to punish trans women.I think it is good to reinforce that "we should forbid trans women from entering women only spaces" is a good way to not force any actual sexual abuse protection since most of these people have a SO BINARY view of the world that i bet they don't believe in cis women being able to be rape.
she has made an apology
which implies she acknoledges that this is real
she has made an apology
which implies she acknoledges that this is real
I think it is good to reinforce that "we should forbid trans women from entering women only spaces" is a good way to not force any actual sexual abuse protection since most of these people have a SO BINARY view of the world that i bet they don't believe in cis women being able to be rape.
Saw this earlier too:
Obviously straight up assault is an escalation on her admitting that she takes sexual pleasure in coercing people who normally use protection into not doing so, but the two behaviors definitely feel connected. Even when she is with consenting partners, she enjoys getting them to do things they don't really want to do.
It's almost as if some people have a particular vested interest in the TERF rhetoric insisting that you require a penis in order to violate.
Yeah
Its also worth noting that the logo for 'superstraight' was essentially the SS nazi logo.Incels on TikTok this year memed their own "superstraight" fake sexual orientation about how they are only attracted to "bio women" and pretended that made them part of the LGBT community.
Thanks. What was so bad about it? Genuine question, haven't listened (and may not now).
It basically was saying that the BBC had been "strong armed" into listening to advice from stonewall on how to approach LGBTQ subjects editorially and also advice for staff. But it painted Stonewall as a political action group and that their involvement didn't allow "both sides of the argument" to be heard. There was only one source in the article I read based on the podcast. Complete BS of an article and I presume podcast.Thanks. What was so bad about it? Genuine question, haven't listened (and may not now).
What have they got to react to? They basically announced recently that this is what they are pushing for going forward.
Rejecting this criticism, the BBC told PinkNews that the article was about a "complex subject", "went through our rigorous editorial process" before being published and "provides appropriate context"
Thank you for getting in touch. We have received a wide range of feedback from those who find the article challenging as well as those who welcome its publication.
The article was carefully considered before publication, went through a rigorous editorial review process and fully complies with the BBC's editorial guidelines and standards.
Some argue that the article is flawed because it is "based on a survey of 80 people". The article itself states there is little research in this area; that the survey featured was conducted on social media and is therefore self-selecting; and even the author of the survey admits it may not be a representative sample. Furthermore, there is a link to the detail of the findings which enables the reader to make up their own minds about the replies the sample generated.
But the article is more than just the survey.
The journalist's work involved months of speaking to many people about the topic and the article includes testimony from a range of different sources and provides appropriate context.
As a public service broadcaster we explore a wide range of issues and perspectives. And we believe it deals with a matter worthy of investigation. We have a strong commitment to impartiality, which means we constantly consider and evaluate which stories to cover and how. Impartiality is fundamental, and includes covering stories on any point of the spectrum of debate. And stories should be seen not just individually, but in the broader context of our wider coverage.
The piece has prompted many complaints and many appreciations and we will consider all feedback carefully.
Kind regards,
BBC Complaints Team
I got the same response from them, and it's complete bullshit.The BBC have responded to complaints about this article, here's what they've written to me:
The key line is stories should be seen not just individually, but in the broader context of our wider coverage and that We have received a wide range of feedback from those who find the article challenging as well as those who welcome its publication.
In the context of their wider coverage, I think it's clear that the BBC is institutionally transphobic and will just get worse.
So one of the cis women, Lily Cade, featured in this article seems to be a serial rapist?!
"Evil...I should fucking know" I mean at least she's aware she's evil and a rapist. Lily Cade doesn't deserve a platform, maybe needs to be kept away from society if she's calling for violence against people.There's now a post going around from Lily Cade's blog where is openly calling for the lynchings of trans people. It is incredibly disturbing.
The link to that is here so only click it if you're ready to read some hate speech:
There's now a post going around from Lily Cade's blog where is openly calling for the lynchings of trans people. It is incredibly disturbing.
The link to that is here so only click it if you're ready to read some hate speech:
Always depressing to see someone unable to work through whatever trauma they've endured. Obviously these opinions are vile but she seems...unwellThere's now a post going around from Lily Cade's blog where is openly calling for the lynchings of trans people. It is incredibly disturbing.
The link to that is here so only click it if you're ready to read some hate speech:
There's now a post going around from Lily Cade's blog where is openly calling for the lynchings of trans people. It is incredibly disturbing.
The link to that is here so only click it if you're ready to read some hate speech:
BBC sure hitched themselves to a winning horse.There's now a post going around from Lily Cade's blog where is openly calling for the lynchings of trans people. It is incredibly disturbing.
The link to that is here so only click it if you're ready to read some hate speech:
Absolutely agree. Another major reason to cancel your TV License.The BBC these days is a fucking joke, it's basically a Tory propaganda wing.
I really wish more people were aware of how the BBC is acting on this particular issue. Either it shows how standards have fallen there in general, or they are willing to throw all rules out the window when publishing transphobic propaganda. Either way, not exactly a great look.
There's now a post going around from Lily Cade's blog where is openly calling for the lynchings of trans people. It is incredibly disturbing.
The link to that is here so only click it if you're ready to read some hate speech: