Can not cosign. Not something you should be super proud of.
Because his campaign is becoming more about winning than it is about ideals.
Sorry, I was vague.Because his campaign is becoming more about winning than it is about ideals.
I mean, I get it, they were never gonna win unless they got aggressive
And people would be rightly disappointed with them if they made an ad touting a Rogan endorsement.Biden, Warren, and Pete all apparently asked to go on his show and he declined. So I assume they'd have done the same had he chosen to host them (and endorse them).
Yup same here.Rogan sucks, but he has a big audience that will actually be swayed by who he endorses.
I'm not fine with this, I just understand it.
Understated point. Joe Rogan has stated that other campaigns have asked to go on his show.Biden, Warren, and Pete all apparently asked to go on his show and he declined. So I assume they'd have done the same had he chosen to host them (and endorse them).
So you're saying you like and support bigots? Good to know.
Bernie is going to de-radicalize an audience?This can only be good. De-radicalizing Rogan's audience is important.
That's not what they said at all. What the fuck.
This is the thing about Bernie with me. I love him as a candidate and I would love either him or Warren as the Democratic pick.
But then every so often his campaign does things like this. I don't know if it's something they're doing on their own or if Bernie had some say in this decision. Either way it's either he's finding allies in bigots or he isn't as skilled in controlling and directing his people.
He doesn't need to retweet a known transphobe and white supremacist booster.He's after his audience. If you think this is a bad call you have no winning instincts.
Fuckin' amen.He doesn't need to retweet a known transphobe and white supremacist booster.
Yep, Rogan makes a lot of people have a "hate-boner" irrationally, right? That's the implication.
Biden, Warren, and Pete all apparently asked to go on his show and he declined. So I assume they'd have done the same had he chosen to host them (and endorse them).
but enough about the NYT editorial boardHe doesn't need to retweet a known transphobe and white supremacist booster.
Hard to see grey when the guy gives a platform to and agrees with bigoted white supremacist talking points.Where did I say that? Just find it funny how many users here hate Rogan, Seems like alot of people see everything in black and white and never a grey area. I.e. enjoying some of rogans podcasts depending on guest makes you a bigot.
So like... are you completely incapable of understanding the words people say?Yep, Rogan makes a lot of people have a "hate-boner" irrationally, right? That's the implication.
He doesn't need to retweet a known transphobe and white supremacist booster.