And the constant jumping back and forth in aspect ratio at the end certainly felt like a weird artistic choice.
Did you watch the IMAX Version?
And the constant jumping back and forth in aspect ratio at the end certainly felt like a weird artistic choice.
If I did, it was accidental. I just clicked on whatever showed up on the banner of the Disney+ app.
I just checked - it looks like it might be defaulting to that version. That's interesting. I found it distracting - I'll need to watch for that.
I don't follow MCU productions closely, so I don't know who ends up in what. That's not the point. The point is you have a series of useless scenes (which you agree with) that drag the movie down, and this being the MCU the only reason they probably aren't cut is because these characters will show up somewhere else and they need to be in place A or B or whatever, and because the MCU seems to be increasingly hung-up on selling the illusion it's all one big story. So yeah, it's a set-up to be payed off down the line (hopefully, or it would even be more redundant)
I haven't watched it at home yet but it was very dim in theaters too. I thought it may have just been my theater's old ass liemax screen but sounds like that's just how the movie looks. Coogler used a different DP for this movie which may be a reason. Though the first movie's opening action sequence, which was also shot in the dark, looked like shit too so maybe Coogler is just bad at shooting action in the dark or something.The movie may have looked better in theaters, but the dark scenes looked like shit on my TV (a combination of not having the latest state of the art TV and streaming compression I'm sure). And the constant jumping back and forth in aspect ratio at the end certainly felt like a weird artistic choice.
Uh..... the character is getting one during this phase lmaoSaw half of the movie so far
I like it except for a few plot points
The college student scientist just seemed so forced like they didn't know where to put the character in so they put the character in this movie
Kinda felt like would have been better if the character had its own show like Ms marvel
Well, you see, there's a series coming this year on Disney+ about her.I did not understand the reason for the college scientist plot, seemed like she was there as a way for Shuri to reach the water civilization leading to the change of heart at the end?
Well, you see, there's a series coming this year on Disney+ about her.
As for the darkness, I feel about this movie the same way I felt when people were complaining about The Batman being too dark. I get it. You shouldn't have to go out and drop a couple of grand on a nice OLED set to deal with shit like that. At the same time, those scenes are fucking beautiful on a large OLED screen. So while I put it on Coogler and team in one sense, I also appreciate and respect that they made the film the way they wanted to make it and basically said fuck your budget/affordable home screens.
The comments about this movie being ugly and too dark are pretty funny to me, even while I can see where both positions are coming from. The CG stuff in this movie is just terrible. I don't know if it's the worst because let's face it, there's been a lot of bad CG in these movies, but my recency bias tells me it's the worst and most jarringly bad implementation of all the MCU movies. That said, I also think the movie is...kind of beautiful, otherwise? There are multiple scenes that just had me marveling at my screen. But for (again) the terrible CG, I think it's a rather beautifully shot film.
As for the darkness, I feel about this movie the same way I felt when people were complaining about The Batman being too dark. I get it. You shouldn't have to go out and drop a couple of grand on a nice OLED set to deal with shit like that. At the same time, those scenes are fucking beautiful on a large OLED screen. So while I put it on Coogler and team in one sense, I also appreciate and respect that they made the film the way they wanted to make it and basically said fuck your budget/affordable home screens.
- I thought Namor's motivations made absolutely no sense. Does he really want to try to wage war on a population of about ~7 billion people in an environment which his people can't even naturally breathe in?
She blew the horn
I thought that the film was pretty mediocre at best.
- I also thought the world-building of the Atlantans felt very ill-defined and nonsensical, even by MCU standards. How do these people cook, dye their clothes and poop? How many of them are there? How did Ramonda contact Namor to arrange meeting on a beach? Their central city seems sufficiently secluded that humans can only get there via a magical vortex thing-y in a diving suit, so why is Namor worried about being attacked?
I said the exact same thing to my friend as we watched it, reminded me of Solo.Saw the movie twice in the cinema. Watched it last night and it was quite dark. I don't remember it being like that in the cinema. I have a 75" LG 4K HDR. Came into here and see others expressing the same sentiment.
Wonder what happened
Its not a Disney + issue, I found it very dark on 4K Blu-ray. It was obviously an issue when they mastered it for the home release.I agree about the darkness and would argue that this is a Disney+ bug, since I've had the same for some other shows, for example, She-Hulk.
Also, the CGI. The Black Panther movies have the worst CGI in the MCU. Not all the way through, but some "effects" just seemed jarringly bad.
Some of these questions definitely don't need to be answered, but I do agree that Talokan suffers from the same issue that for example Atlantis from Aquaman suffered from to some level.- I also thought the world-building of the Atlantans felt very ill-defined and nonsensical, even by MCU standards. How do these people cook, dye their clothes and poop? How many of them are there? How did Ramonda contact Namor to arrange meeting on a beach? Their central city seems sufficiently secluded that humans can only get there via a magical vortex thing-y in a diving suit, so why is Namor worried about being attacked?
Some of these questions definitely don't need to be answered, but I do agree that Talokan suffers from the same issue that for example Atlantis from Aquaman suffered from to some level.
Instead of asking "Okay, but how would an underwater society function?" they just went "It's like regular civilization, but underwater". IIRC at some point in the scene where they first enter Talokan, you see people playing a ball game, which just simply wouldn't be possible underwater. And sure, I'm sure somewhere there's a MCU bible that says "Actually, that ball is made from a special Talokan fabric so it behaves like a normal ball underwater", but that is a very unimaginative explanation.
I mean, they quite blatantly inform you they live an amphibious life both within the water and without. Were you guys just not paying attention? 🤣
- Felt somewhat disconnected from the MCU, like if there is a force threatening the world then why not attempt to get support from some of King T'Challa's superhero friends that literally defended Wakanda a few years back?
By "force" do you mean Namor's people or other states wanting to raid Wakanda for vibranium?
But amphibians can breathe air through their lungs...
I'm really not quite sure what the narrative purpose of making the Atlanteans unable to breathe oxygen even was. It seems like something that could have been discarded without substantially changing the structure of the film.
They required a means of moving the on ground civilization deep beneath the ocean depths. It's a Marvel movie. It isn't that…deep.
* Did they really need to kill the scientist? The US govt clearly already had the machine so they could in theory replicate the machine
It's a magical horn that he can hear anywhere in the world.So like are there specific toots to confirm the date and time? How does he return a call?