I was about to leave, thank you.
"The blacks" has racist connotations. Using "blacks" as a plural noun means literally the same thing as using "whites" or "Asians". As mentioned before, "blacks" as a plural noun referring to black people is used in peer reviewed scientific literature alongside "Whites", "Hispanics", and so on. It saves time compared to writing "people of African descent" over and over again.Well intentioned but they just missed the mark. "Blacks" (plural) has racist connotations imo (like signs that used to say Whites/Blacks only).
No problem here. In fact I much rather be called Black than African American, to the extent that Ive started correcting people when say it.
I mean when used by black people of course. Like here Blacks at Xbox is used as a self-identifaction by a group of black people. But then there's people who find it offensive or problematic. From my understanding n-word is in similar situation. People may refer to themselves or to other people with the word, while some people see it as degrading even when coming from a black person. Didn't mean to imply similar history and/or severity for the words.
They're trying too hard with the fist bump, colors alone would be alright though.It's a discussion board. People are discussing it. Nobody is calling for Phil Spencer to resign.
Make one without the fist bump graphic and take my money tho.
Hi five! I'm in my Latinos @ erg and support my local Latino affinity chapter!my exact thoughts. my company also has a Black @ <company name> ERG which i am in
They're trying too hard with the fist bump, colors alone would be alright though.
Think of it like this: black people often have to deal with labels they had no say in choosing. And even when they do choose to self apply these labels, they are still turned into epithets. Hence mixed feelings.So it's similar to the N-word? Some black people use it, while some wish it would just go away entirely and not be uttered by any black people either.
Edit: Don't mean to imply that there's similar baggage and history to these words and that they would be equally offensive and hurtful.
The image graphic shoulda been the control graphic. if we being real.They're trying too hard with the fist bump, colors alone would be alright though.
BackpedallingI know they are backpedaling now and it's not the worst thing that could have been posted; but I'm pretty sure MS's PR people wish they didn't post this now.
FrThe image graphic shoulda been the control graphic. if we being real.
People are upset with "Blacks," plural. The "s" makes it sound like In the Heat of the Night.
That is way to long for a catch phrase.
Not working. Especially not working in tandem with the Women of/in Xbox and some other groups.
I mean we can work around it but "blacks" aint the answer imo. Thats all. We can find a way, people shouldnt talk like its impossible.But what about the non-binaries?
The reality is picking a name that's going to make EVERYONE happy is a tall order, and probably not feasible when it comes to a situation like this where you're identifying a specific minority group by what makes them part of that group.
The best name would probably be one that didn't refer to them by what makes them part of said group.
No problem here. In fact I much rather be called Black than African American, to the extent that Ive started correcting people when they say it.
Pretty bad phrasing. "blacks" always makes me wince a bit when I hear. It's like saying "the gays" or "the Jews".
Black has always worked for me. Never liked African American personally.
He says in the singularThis thread makes me want to listen to James Brown's "Say It Loud – We're Blacks and We're Proud."
Whites at ResetEra
Black has always worked for me. Never liked African American personally.
I can have a opinion on it as well, that is the point.What? It's literally their opinion that matters here. And you are not being called blacks here, since you are not part of that group which decided to be called that.
lmaoooo
To be fair there's something to say about white people swooping in to these threads to fingerwag at said folks and act like there's nothing to talk about. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯But who is actually upset?
Feels like white peoples are upset on behalf of black people , who in turn aren't upset at all, because they created it.
Same. I've never stepped foot in Africa 🤷🏾♂️.
That controller looks amazing too
Every time.To be fair there's something to say about white people swooping in to these threads to fingerwag at said folks and act like there's nothing to talk about. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
That's fair and I'm sure the actual activities and events are well handled. But its very clear to me that at the outset a black person(s) had to tell or submit this to a panel of white people to get this group founded and took the path of least resistance. Correct me if I'm wrong.As someone who was on an affinity board and knows many of the folks building these groups at a few companies this one included, it's not about making a homogenous group and saying yay affinity. It's about giving power to folks to not only own and represent their culture but recruit specifically to their culture and people and grow diversity at the companies. Don't worry, we all get together to put our multiorg events, but this is done so we're not lost in the sea of 'everyone is diverse' and 'all lives matter'
"The blacks" has racist connotations. Using "blacks" as a plural noun means literally the same thing as using "whites" or "Asians". As mentioned before, "blacks" as a plural noun referring to black people is used in peer reviewed scientific literature alongside "Whites", "Hispanics", and so on. It saves time compared to writing "people of African descent" over and over again.
"See?! Black people aren't offended!"This thread is just non black people telling us how to feel huh