Until something is agreed upon, No Deal is the default and will happen on 29th March.
Yeah, I know. I just wondered if they'd made an agreement to actually make sure we don't no deal.
Until something is agreed upon, No Deal is the default and will happen on 29th March.
Nothing has changed since the WA was rejected.
Nothing has changed since the WA was rejected.
If you go back a bit in this thread you're see a helpful infographic that explains things succinctly.
🤔I've never known why MP's salaries aren't constrained to the same public sector freezes they place on other public sector workers.
I'm always not surprised when they applaud the usual reactionary Brexit bullshit, but like, applauding JRM's comments about concentration camps was yikes central. There needs to be a separate QT aftershow that fact checks everything. Bruce just nodding along to his bullshit.
Intense discussions are taking place at Westminster that could lead to the emergence of a new centrist party consisting of six or more disaffected anti-Brexit Labour MPs along with the involvement of some Conservatives and the backing of the Liberal Democrats.
I saw that bit. It was utterly sickening. And of course, Rees-Mogg was just making it up.
But as a posh-voiced old man, all the other old men believed him over the uppity young women.
Labour and Tory MPs are in talks for setting up a new centrist party.
Although the headline makes it sound like Labour and Tory rebels are joining forces under one banner, the first paragraph clarifies it as:
Basically from reading the whole text it looks like the usual suspects will jump ship from Labour, sympathetic Tories will say "good on you mate" and then probably remain in the Conservative party because that's what they do, and the Lib Dems will start courting this new party for a merger.
Labour strategists are apparently pretty relaxed about it, and I can't say I blame them. Some "problem" elements show themselves the door, and then when the next round of elections come there's a chance they're utterly humiliated if a Labour candidate more on-board with the leadership sweeps up their seat.
Labour and Tory MPs are in talks for setting up a new centrist party.
Although the headline makes it sound like Labour and Tory rebels are joining forces under one banner, the first paragraph clarifies it as:
Basically from reading the whole text it looks like the usual suspects will jump ship from Labour, sympathetic Tories will say "good on you mate" and then probably remain in the Conservative party because that's what they do, and the Lib Dems will start courting this new party for a merger.
Labour strategists are apparently pretty relaxed about it, and I can't say I blame them. Some "problem" elements show themselves the door, and then when the next round of elections come there's a chance they're utterly humiliated if a Labour candidate more on-board with the leadership sweeps up their seat.
Lol there is a new centrist party announced almost every week.
Also people don't want a centrist party. They may want hard remain but very few are centrists.It's people who have been in Westminster too long, just cross the floor to the libdems, this rebranding nonsense is a waste of time. The answer is not another new party that gets buggered by first past the post.
It's people who have been in Westminster too long, just cross the floor to the libdems, this rebranding nonsense is a waste of time. The answer is not another new party that gets buggered by first past the post.
Jesus, of all the things to say it's the no longer really bad word that he goes for.
Jesus, of all the things to say it's the no longer really bad word that he goes for.
I don't think Jeremy Vine actually has a problem with it, just caught him off guard.
I get that the libdems have a bad reputation due to the coalition, but I don't think Labour MPs joining forces with tory ones can say much about it. The libdems managed to pull off winning in tory areas and appealing to some Labour type areas, I don't see that being repeated by a new party that people can see through.
I have no doubt some of them might get cold feet when push comes to shove. At some point there will be an element of doubt whether they could hold their seat for this new party, and fretting over the sheer humiliation of losing it to a Corbyn-friendly Labour candidate.Much like the Tory rebellion, I'll believe it when I see it, it's been talked about with nothing behind it now for too long
None of them will be missed, and that's probably why Labour strategists are so relaxed about the whole thing. It's hardly the SDP all over again.
I don't think Jeremy Vine actually has a problem with it, just caught him off guard.
Some are too far gone to turn back though, IMO. Luciana Berger especially, she's absolutely checked out mentally on being a Labour MP, and her CLP are looking to remove her. Admittedly some of that is down to antisemitic crankism which should 100% be rebuffed and rooted out, but there's a convincing case to be made she no longer represents the interests of her CLP. I say convincing, it's more of a slam dunk tbh. She doesn't want Labour in Government in its current state.
Knew it. Outright existential fear is going to be dismissed on the grounds of presumed petulance.
Fuck Theresa May, and Jeremy Vine.
I saw that bit. It was utterly sickening. And of course, Rees-Mogg was just making it up.
But as a posh-voiced old man, all the other old men believed him over the uppity young women.
I had a quick google and the mortality rate in the Boer concentration camps in a single year was about 25% (about 25,000 of about 100,000 prisoners).
10% of the total (i.e. inside and outside the camps) South African Boer population died, and 50% of the total under-16 population (a large majority of the deths in camps were children).
I'm sure Glasgow in the 1900s was a bit shit, but I doubt it was that bad. I think the average Glaswegian would be expected to survive for more than 4 years. And no one culled half the under-16s.
Rees-Mogg even had the gall to say the British were interning them for their own protection during the war. Protection from whom? The British burnt down their farms and rounded them up into camps like fucking cattle.
You don't get to say, "Of course, things were different back then and we can't apply 2019 morals to the early 20th century!"
59% of the population are open to voting for their idea of a centre party.
Current trading and future prospects have also been seriously affected by the uncertainty created by the Brexit process, which has led to our inability to secure valuable flying contracts in Europe and lack of confidence around bmi's ability to continue flying between destinations in Europe.
Oh look, that 7 point lead didn't last. Waddasurprise.
Also
[X] Doubt
Yup, government renewed its subsidiary of the Derry route only 2 days before the airline going tits up, staff weren't told about the closure till 6.30pm today, they had no prior warning.
Everybody likes to think they're a centrist, even people with extreme opinions. Meaningless poll.
Take a clue from UKIP.I'm really curious if this potential centrist vote can be efficient enough to win seats and not just national vote share though.
As much as Brexit is a challenge, they reported 522,000 passengers on 29,000 flights, making an average passenger number of 18 per flight. Their jets have a max seating capacity of 35 (ERJ 135) and 50 (ERJ 145) respectively. Thats averaging less than half full on each flight
That is not sustainable, Brexit or no Brexit.
As much as Brexit is a challenge, they reported 522,000 passengers on 29,000 flights, making an average passenger number of 18 per flight. Their jets have a max seating capacity of 35 (ERJ 135) and 50 (ERJ 145) respectively. Thats averaging less than half full on each flight
That is not sustainable, Brexit or no Brexit.